Skip to main content

OWL and Qualitative Reasoning Models

  • Conference paper
KI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (KI 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4314))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The desire to share and reuse knowledge has led to the establishment of the Web Ontology Language (OWL) knowledge representation language. The Naturnet-Redime project needs to share qualitative knowledge models of issues relevant to sustainable development and OWL seems the obvious choice for representing such models to allow search and other activities relevant to sharing knowledge models. However, although the design choices made in OWL are properly documented, their implications for Artificial Intelligence (AI) are part of ongoing research. This paper explores the expressiveness of OWL by formalising the vocabulary and models used in Qualitative Reasoning (QR), and the applicability of OWL reasoners to solve QR problems. A parser has been developed to export (and import) the QR representations to (and from) OWL representations. To create the OWL definitions of the QR vocabulary and models, existing OWL patterns were used as much as possible. However, some new patterns, and pattern modifications, had to be developed in order to represent the QR vocabulary and models using OWL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bechhofer, S., et al.: OWL web ontology language reference. In: Dean, M., Schreiber, G. (eds.) W3C recommendation (Feb. 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bredeweg, B., Salles, P., Neumann, M.: Ecological Applications of Qualitative Reasoning. In: Recknagel, F. (ed.) Ecological Informatics: Scope, Techniques and Applications, 2nd edn., pp. 15–47. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bredeweg, B., Struss, P.: Current topics in qualitative reasoning (editorial introduction). AI Magazine 24(4), 13–16 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Kleer, J., Brown, J.S.: A qualitative physics based on confluences. Artificial Intelligence 24(1-3), 7–83 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Forbus, K.D.: Qualitative process theory. Artificial Intelligence 24(1-3), 85–168 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Noy, N.F., et al.: The protege owl plugin: An open development environment for semantic web applications. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 229–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hayes, P.J.: The Second Naive Physics Manifesto. In: Hobbs, J.R., Moore, R.C. (eds.) Formal Theories of the Commonsense World. Ablex series in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 1–36. Ablex, Norwood (June 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heflin, J.: OWL web ontology language use cases and requirements. W3C recommendation (February 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuipers, B.: Qualitative reasoning: modeling and simulation with incomplete knowledge. Automatica 25(4), 571–585 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Noy, N., Rector, A.: Defining n-ary relations on the semantic web. W3C working group note (April 2006), http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/

  11. Rector, A.: Representing specified values in OWL: ”value partitions” and ”value sets”. W3C working group note (May 2005), http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-specified-values/

  12. Salles, P., Bredeweg, B.: Qualitative reasoning about population and community ecology. AI Magazine 24(4), 77–90 (2003)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Schreiber, G., et al.: Knowledge Engineering and Management - The CommonKADS Methodology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. van Heijst, G., et al.: A case study in ontology library contruction. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 7(3), 227–255 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wielemaker, J., Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B.: Using triples for implementation: the Triple20 ontology-manipulation tool. In: Gil, Y., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 773–785. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Wielemaker, J., Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B.J.: Prolog-based infrastructure for RDF: performance and scalability. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 644–658. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christian Freksa Michael Kohlhase Kerstin Schill

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liem, J., Bredeweg, B. (2007). OWL and Qualitative Reasoning Models. In: Freksa, C., Kohlhase, M., Schill, K. (eds) KI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4314. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69912-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69912-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69911-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69912-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics