Abstract
In this paper, we contrast inductive nursing risk management and abductive nursing risk management, point out the importance of the abductive type, and suggest cooperation between them. In general risk management, inductive management is usually adopted. If we computationally conduct inductive management, it is vital to collect a considerable number of examples to perform machine learning. For nursing risk management, risk management experts usually perform manual learning to produce textbooks. In the Accident or Incident Report Database home page, we can review various types of accidents or incidents. However, since reports are written by various nurses, the granularity and quality of reports are not sufficient for machine learning. We, therefore, explain the importance of conducting dynamic nursing risk management that can be achieved by abduction, then illustrate cooperation between abductive and inductive types of nursing risk management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abe, A.: Abductive Analogical Reasoning. Systems and Computers in Japan 31(1), 11–19 (2000)
Abe, A.: On The Relation between Abductive Hypotheses and Inductive Hypotheses. In: Flach, P.A., Kakas, A.C. (eds.) Abduction and Induction, pp. 169–180. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)
Abe, A.: The Role of Abduction in Chance Discovery. New Generation Computing 21(1), 61–71 (2003)
Abe, A., Kogure, K., Hagita, N.: Determination of A Chance in Nursing Risk Management. In: Proc. of ECAI2004 Workshop on Chance Discovery, pp. 222–231 (2004)
Abe, A., Kogure, K., Hagita, N., Iseki, H.: Integrated Data Mining System for Analysis of Nursing Accidents and Incidents. In: Proc. of SCI2004, vol. 7, pp. 265–270 (2004)
Abe, A., Ozaku, H.I., Kuwahara, N., Kogure, K.: Scenario Violation in Nursing Activities — Nursing Risk Management from the viewpoint of Chance Discovery. Soft Computing Journal (to appear, 2006)
Abe, A., Ozaku, H.I., Kuwahara, N., Kogure, K.: Scenario-base Construction for Abductive Nursing Risk Management. In: Proc. of IPUM2006, pp. 206–213 (2006)
Abe, A., Ozaku, H.I., Kuwahara, N., Kogure, K.: What Should be Abducible in Abductive Nursing Risk Management? In: Gabrys, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4253, pp. 22–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Brusoni, V., Console, L., Terenziani, P., Dupré, D.T.: An Efficient Algorithm for Temporal Abduction. In: Proc. 5th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 195–206 (1997)
Chasen homepage. http://chasen.aist-nara.ac.jp/
Database of accident and incident reports (in Japanese) http://www.hiyari-hatto.jp/
Japan Academy of Nursing Science (ed.): Classification of Nursing Practice (in Japanese). Japan Academy of Nursing Science (2005)
Japane Nursing Association (ed.): Nursing Practice Classification Table (in Japanese). Japane Nursing Association (2004)
Kuwahara, N., et al.: Ubiquitous and Wearable Sensing for Monitoring Nurses’ Activities. In: Proc. SCI2004, vol. 7, pp. 281–285 (2004)
Matsuoka, K., Yokoyama, S.: Analysis of Incident Data by Medical Data Mining (No. 2) (in Japanese). Medical Treatment, Inspection Machine and Reagent 25(4), 275–285 (2002)
Naya, F., et al.: Location and Activity Recognition using Hetrogeneous Sensors. In: Proc. of KSEL2006, pp. 25–31 (2006)
Ohsawa, Y., Benson, N.E., Yachida, M.: KeyGraph: Automatic Indexing by Co-occurrence Graph based on Building Construction Metaphor. In: Proc. Advanced Digital Library Conference (IEEE ADL’98), pp. 12–18. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1998)
Ohsawa, Y.: Chance Discovery for Making Decisions in Complex Real World. New Generation Computing 20(2), 143–163 (2002)
Ohsawa, Y., Okazaki, N., Matsumura, N.: A Scenario Development on Hepatics B and C, Technical Report of JSAI, SIG-KBS-A301, pp. 177–182 (2003)
Ozaku, H.I., Sagara, K., Naya, F., Kuwahara, N., Abe, A., Kogure, K.: Building Dialogue Corpora for Nursing Activity Analysis. In: Proc. of LINC-2005 Workshop, pp. 41–48 (2005)
Ozaku, H.I., Abe, A., Sagara, K., Kuwahara, N., Kogure, K.: A Task Analysis of Nursing Activites Using Spoken Corpora. Advances in Natural Language Processing, Research in Computing Science 18, 125–136 (2006)
Ozaku, H.I., Sagara, K., Kuwahara, N., Abe, A., Kogure, K.: Nursing Spoken Corpora for Understanding Nursing Assignments. In: Proc. of NI2006, pp. 481–485 (2006)
Poole, D., Goebel, R., Aleliunas, R.: Theorist: A Logical Reasoning System for Defaults and Diagnosis. In: Cercone, N.J., McCalla, G. (eds.) The Knowledge Frontier: Essays in the Representation of Knowledge, pp. 331–352. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)
Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)
Reiter, R., de Kleer, J.: Foundation of assumption-based truth maintenance systems: Preliminary report. In: Proc. of AAAI87, pp. 183–188 (1987)
Vincent, C., Ennis, M., Audley, R.J. (eds.): Medical Accidents. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abe, A., Ozaku, H.I., Kuwahara, N., Kogure, K. (2007). Relation Between Abductive and Inductive Types of Nursing Risk Management. In: Washio, T., Satoh, K., Takeda, H., Inokuchi, A. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4384. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69902-6_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69902-6_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69901-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69902-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)