Abstract
Software risk management studies commonly focus on project level risks and strategies. Software architecture investigations are often concerned with the design, implementation and maintenance of the architecture. However, there has been little effort to study risk management in the context of software architecture. We have identified risks and corresponding management strategies specific to software architecture evolution as they occur in industry, from interviews with 16 Norwegian IT-professionals. The most influential (and frequent) risk was “Lack of stakeholder communication affected implementation of new and changed architectural requirements negatively”. The second most frequent risk was “Poor clustering of functionality affected performance negatively”. Architects focus mainly on architecture creation. However, their awareness of needed improvements in architecture evaluation and documentation is increasing. Most have no formally defined/documented architecture evaluation method, nor mention it as a mitigation strategy. Instead, problems are fixed as they occur, e.g. to obtain the missing artefacts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004)
Bass, L., Buhman, C., Comella-Dorda, S., Long, F., Robert, J., Seacord, R., Wallnau, K.: Volume I: Market Assessment of Component-based Software Engineering in SEI Technical Report number CMU/SEI-2001-TN-007 (2001)
Belady, L.A., Lehman, M.M.: A model of a Large Program Development. IBM Systems Journal 15(1), 225–252 (1976)
Bennett, K.H., Rajlich, V.: Software Maintenance and Evolution: A Roadmap. In: ICSE 2000 – Future of Software Engineering, Limerick, Ireland, pp. 73–87 (2000)
Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering, 6th edn., p. 728. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)
Ropponen, J., Lyytinen, K.: Components of Software Development Risk: How to Address Them? A Project Manager Survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26(2), 98–112 (2000)
Ali Babar, M., Bass, L., Gorton, I.: Factors Influencing Industrial Practices of Software Architecture Evaluation: An Empirical Investigation. In: QoSA 2007, Medford, Massachusetts, USA, July 12-13 (2007)
Boehm, B.W.: Software Risk management: Principles and Practices. IEEE Software 8(1), 32–41 (1991)
Carr, M., Kondra, S., Monarch, I., Ulrich, F., Walker, C.: Taxonomy-Based Risk Identification, Technical Report SEI-93-TR-006, SEI, Pittsburgh, USA (1993)
Keil, M., Kule, P.E., Lyytinen, K., Schmidt, R.C.: A Framework for Identifying Softare Project Risks. Communications of the ACM 4(11), 76–83 (1998)
Boehm, B.W.: A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. IEEE Computer 21(5), 61–72 (1988)
Gemmer, A.: Risk Management: Moving Beyond Process. IEEE Computer 30(5), 33–41 (1997)
Hecht, H.: Systems Reliability and Failure Prevention. Artech House Publishers (2004)
Clerc, V., Lago, P., van Vliet, H.: The Architect’s Mindset. In: QoSA 2007, Medford, Massachusetts, USA, July 12-13 (2007)
Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering – An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)
Seaman, C.B.: Qualitative Methods in Empirical Studies of Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25(4), 557–572 (1999)
Lethbridge, T.C., Sim, S.E., Singer, J.: Studying Software Engineers: Data Collection Techniques for Software Field Studies. Empirical Software Engineering 10(3), 311–341 (2005)
Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L.: Principles of Survey Research, Parts 1 to 6. ACM Software Engineering Notes (2001 – 2002)
Messerschmitt, D.G., Szyperski, C.: Marketplace Issues in Software Planning and Design. IEEE Software 21(3), 62–70 (2004)
Johnson, R.E., Foote, B.: Designing Reusable Classes. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming 1(2), 22–35 (1988)
Bass, L., Nord, R., Wood, W., Zubrow, D.: Risk Themes Discovered Through Architecture Evaluations. In: Proc. WICSA 2007 (2007)
O’Connell, D.: Boeing’s Experiences using the SEI ATAM® and QAW Processes (April 2006), http://www.sei.cmu.edu/architecture/saturn/2006/OConnell.pdf
Charette, R.N.: Why software fails. Spectrum 42(9), 42–49 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Slyngstad, O.P.N., Li, J., Conradi, R., Babar, M.A. (2008). Identifying and Understanding Architectural Risks in Software Evolution: An Empirical Study. In: Jedlitschka, A., Salo, O. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5089. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69566-0_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69566-0_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69564-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69566-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)