The main purpose of the evaluation stage is to judge the tolerability or acceptability of a given threat and, if deemed necessary, to initiate a management process. The chief purpose of the stage of management, closely related to the stage of evaluation, is to decide on intervention measures which will range in each case from strict prohibition (such as bans and phase outs) to unrestricted permission. In between, there lies a wide range of measures, including legal requirements (such as exposure standards, engineering regulations, and best practice), financial instruments (such as mandatory insurance, assurance bonds, or tradable licenses), private self-regulations (such as in-house quality control) and information and educational strategies (such as consumer information, labelling, and classroom curricula). Following a regulatory impact assessment of the possible measures, investigating their feasibility to and acceptability by stakeholders, one or more appropriate measures are selected and implemented, and enforcement details and options for review are determined. The various key features of evaluation and management are illustrated in Fig. 5.1 below.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
1 The UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) developed an evaluation procedure for chemical risks based on risk-risk comparisons (cp. Löfstedt 1997). Some Swiss cantons such as Basle County experimented with Round Tables as a means to reach consensus on drawing the two lines, whereby participants in the Round Table represented industry, administrators, county officials, environmentalists, and neighbourhood groups (cp. RISKO 2000: 2–3). Irrespective of the selected means to support this task, the judgement on tolerability or acceptability is contingent on making use of a variety of different knowledge sources.
- 2.
2 The containment approach allows small steps in implementation enabling the managers to stop, or even reverse, the process as new knowledge is being produced or the negative side effects become visible. It is applied in European regulation of GM crops. Principally, for each case a risk assessment is carried out and the likelihoods of characterized hazards are determined by successively larger-scale experiments (case-by-case, step-by-step approach).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Renn, O., Dreyer, M. (2009). The Processes Evaluation and Management. In: Renn, O., Dreyer, M. (eds) Food Safety Governance. Risk, Governance and Society, vol 15. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69309-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69309-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69308-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69309-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)