Skip to main content

Assessing Water Quality Impacts of Community Defined Land Use Change Scenarios for the Douglas Shire, Far North Queensland

  • Chapter
Landscape Analysis and Visualisation

Abstract

The Douglas Shire is promoted as the only place in the world where two world heritage areas meet — the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) and the Wet Tropics of Far North Queensland. Over 80% of the shire's land area is World Heritage listed. On the remaining 20%, economic pressureson primary industries coupled with development pressures to subdivide agricultural land for urban and rural residential expansion provide a challenge not only for local people living in the shire, but also for planners and natural resource managers who have a responsibility to implement the Reef Water Quality Protection Plan (Reefplan) (Commonwealth and Queensland Governments 2003). The purpose of the Reefplan is to develop actions, mechanisms and partnerships to halt and reverse the decline in the quality of water flowing in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon.

The research presented in this chapter contributes to this goal by applying a social—ecological framework that links biophysical and social science data and is based on partnerships and local collaboration to achieve sustainability outcomes. This chapter focuses, in accordance with the Reefplan, on water quality and summarises the water quality impacts resulting from six spatially explicit land use change scenarios that were developed in col laboration with the local community in the Douglas Shire for the year 2025, based on their aspirations for a sustainable future. The spatially explicit land use change scenarios were used as input into the Sediment River Network Model (SedNet) to assess and compare the water quality outcomes of the current situation with the community developed scenarios for the future, with the aim of identifying actions to improve water quality.

The model results show that the changes in land use proposed in all scenarios lead to no or a relatively small reduction in sediment loads exported from the Douglas Shire, indicating that the SedNet model, which was applied for the whole of catchment, is insensitive to land use changes in the floodplain part of the landscape. Despite the fact that the SedNet results did not support community discussion about potential actions to achieve improvements in water quality, the application of the social—ecological framework proved to be an important mechanism to build community capacity for participation in planning for sustainable future landscapes and seascapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Al-Kodmany K (1999) Using visualisation techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: process, implementation, and evaluation. Landscape Urban Planning 45:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker A (2005) Capacity building for sustainability: towards community development in coastal Scotland. Journal of Environmental Management 75:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartley R, Henderson A, Prosser IP, Hughes AO, McKergow L, Lu H, Brodie J, Bainbridge Z, Roth CH (2003) Patterns of erosion and sediment and nutrient transport in the Herbert River catchment, Queensland. CSIRO, Canberra, available at http://www.clw.csiro.au/publications/consultancy/2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley R, Henderson A, Baker G, Bormans M, Wilkinson S (2004) Patterns of erosion and sediment and nutrient transport in the Douglas Shire catchments. CSIRO Land and Water, Atherton, pp 61

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnet I (2004) Sustainable landscape planning in the Wet Tropics. Retrieved 25 July 2007, from http://www.cse.csiro.au/research/landscapescenarios/

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnet I, Smith DM (2007) Planning future landscapes in the Wet Tropics of Australia: A social-ecological framework. Landscape Urban Planning 80:137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie J, Mitchell AW (2005) Nutrients in Australian tropical rivers: changes with agricultural development and implications for receiving environments. Marine and Freshwater Research 56(3):279–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie JE, Christie C, Devlin M, Haynes D, Morris S, Ramsay M, Waterhouse J, Yorkston H (2001) Catchment management and the Great Barrier Reef. Water Science and Technology 43:203–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth and Queensland Governments (2003) Reef water quality protection plan: for catchments adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. Australian Government and Queensland Government

    Google Scholar 

  • Countryside Commission (1993) Landscape assessment guidance. Countryside Commission, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas Shire Council (2006)Douglas Shire local area planning scheme. Douglas Shire Council, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • FNQNRM (2004) Sustaining the Wet Tropics: a regional plan for natural resource management. Far North Queensland Natural Resource Management Ltd, and Rainforest Corporate Research Centre, Cairns

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnas M (2003) Catchments and corals, terrestrial runoff to the Great Barrier Reef. Australian Institute of Marine Science, CRC Reef Research Centre, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulse DW, Branscomb A, Payne SG (2004) Envisioning alternatives: using citizen guidance to map future land and water use. Ecological Applications. 14:325–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulse DW, Gregory S, Baker J (2002) Willamette River Basin planning atlas. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessel B, Jacobs J (2005) Land use scenarios development and stakeholder involvement as tools for watershed management within the Havel River Basin. Limnologica 35:220–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasemir B, Jaeger J, Jaeger CC, Gardner MT (2003) Public participation in sustainability science – a handbook. Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange E (1999) Realitä und computergestützte visuele Simulation. Eine empirische Untersuching über den Realitätsgrad virtueller Landschaften am Beispiel des Talraums Bunnen-Schwyz. ORL-Berichte Nr. 106, VDF, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Luz F (2000) Participatory landscape ecology – A basis for acceptance and implementation. Landscape Urban Planning 50:157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Luz F, Weiland U (2001) Wessen Landschaft planen wir? Kommunikation in Landschafts- und Umweltplanung. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 33:69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald G, Weston N (2004) Sustaining the Wet Tropics: a regional plan for natural resource management, Vol. 1: Background to the plan. Rainforest Corporate Research Centre and Far North Queensland Natural Resource Management Ltd, Cairns

    Google Scholar 

  • McKergow LA, Prosser IP, Hughes AO, Brodie J (2005). Regional scale nutrient modelling: exports to the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. Marine Pollution Bulletin 51(1–4):186–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt WS (2002). Biophysical considerations in integrated catchment management: a modelling system for northern Thailand. Unpublished PhD thesis, Australian National University, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe DJ, Westcott DA (in prep) Distribution of biodiversity and ecosystem processes in a fragmented tropical floodplain

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Corry RC (2004) Using normative scenarios in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 19:343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palang H, Alumäe H, Mander ü (2000) Holistic aspects in landscape development: a scenario approach. Landscape Urban Planning 50:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayment G (2003) Water quality in sugar catchments of Queensland. Water Science and Technology 48:35–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Roebeling PC, Bohnet IM, Smith DM, Westcott D, Kroon F, Hartcher M, Hodgen M, Vleeshouwer J (2005) Landscapes toolkit for triple-bottom-line assessment of land-use scenarios in Great Barrier Reef catchments. In: Proceedings of MODSIM 2005 Conference, 12–15 December 2007, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid W (2001) The emerging role of visual resource assessment and visualisation in landscape planning in Switzerland. Landscape Urban Planning 54:213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman D (2000) Doing qualitative research — a practical handbook. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanwick C (2002) Landscape character assessment – guidance for England and Scotland. A report by Land Use Consultants for The Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage, Wetherby, West Yorkshire and Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress B, Tress G (2003) Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning – a study from Denmark. Landscape Urban Planning 64:161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson SN, Henderson A, Chen Y, Sherman BS (2004) SedNet: user guide Version 2.0.0. CSIRO, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams J, Read C, Norton A, Dovers S, Burgman M, Proctor W, Anderson H. (2001) Biodiversity, Australia State of the Environment Report 2001 (Theme Report), CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson PR (1991) Agricultural land suitability of the wet tropical coast, Mossman and Julatten area. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bohnet, I., Brodie, J., Bartley, R. (2008). Assessing Water Quality Impacts of Community Defined Land Use Change Scenarios for the Douglas Shire, Far North Queensland. In: Pettit, C., Cartwright, W., Bishop, I., Lowell, K., Pullar, D., Duncan, D. (eds) Landscape Analysis and Visualisation. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69168-6_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics