Skip to main content

Overshoot Effect in Stiffness Perception Tasks during Hand Motion with Haptic Device

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5024))

Abstract

This study is concerned with the overshoot effect in a task of surface differentiation when both surface stiffness and impact velocity are varied. Psychophysical experiments are conducted using virtual surfaces rendered with a force-feedback device with velocity as visual constraint. We test the force constancy hypothesis formulated by Walker and Tan [12][1] which states that users maintain constant penetration force while exploring haptic virtual surfaces. Data collected during stroking surfaces of varying stiffness partially support this hypothesis and allow to consider the relevance of the impact velocity factor. Our results clearly show that changes in impact velocity affects surface penetration. Our findings underscore the importance of better understanding the interplay of the human perceptual parameters in a haptic framework. Future work will focus on the development of compensation rules for ensuring perceptual accuracy of anatomic haptic virtual environments. This will ensure accurate simulation of the haptic interaction between surgical tools and body organs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Choi, S., Walker, L., Tan, H.Z., Crittenden, S., Reifenberger, R.: Force constancy and its effect on haptic perception of virtual surfaces. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2(2), 89–105 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerovich, O., Marayong, P., Okamura, A.M.: The effect of visual and haptic feedback on computer-assisted needle insertion. Computer Aided Surgery 9(6), 243–249 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Klatzky, R.L., Lederman, S.J., Reed, C.: Haptic integration of object properties: Texture, hardness, and planar contour. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15(1), 45–57 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Limas, M.C., Mere, J.B.O., Gonzalez, E.P.V., de Pison Ascacibar, F.J.M., Espinoza, A.V.P., Elias, F.A.: AMORE: A MORE flexible neural network package. R package version 0.2-10 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. O’Malley, M.K., Goldfarb, M.: The implication of surface stiffness for size identification and perceived surface hardness in haptic interface. In: IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics & Automation, Washington, DC, pp. 1255–1260. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Perreault, J.O., Cao, C.G.L.: Effects of vision and friction on haptic perception. Human Factors 48(3), 574–586 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rousselet, G.A., Thorpe, S.J., Fabre-Thorpe, M.: Taking the MAX from neuronal responses. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(3), 99–102 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Samur, E., Wang, F., Spaelter, U., Bleuler, H.: Generic and systematic evaluation of haptic interfaces based on testbeds. In: IEEE Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Diego, CA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shon, Y., McMains, S.: Haptic force shading parameter effects on path tracing accuracy. In: Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment & Teleoperator Systems, pp. 517–523 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smeets, J.B.J., Brenner, E.: The difference between the perception of absolute and relative motion: a reaction time study. Vision Research 43(2), 191–195 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vega-Bermudez, F., Johnson, K.O., Hsiao, S.S.: Human tactile pattern recognition: active versus passive touch, velocity effects, and patterns of confusion. Journal of Neurophysiology 65, 531–546 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walker, L., Tan, H.Z.: A perceptual study on haptic rendering of surface topography when both surface height and stiffness vary. In: Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment & Teleoperator Systems, pp. 138–145 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu, M., Abbott, J.J., Okamura, A.M.: Effects of velocity on human force control. In: EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment & Teleoperator Systems, pp. 73–79. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Manuel Ferre

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vicentini, M., Botturi, D. (2008). Overshoot Effect in Stiffness Perception Tasks during Hand Motion with Haptic Device. In: Ferre, M. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices and Scenarios. EuroHaptics 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5024. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69057-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69057-3_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69056-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69057-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics