Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 213))

  • 1954 Accesses

Abstract

When Pearl’s algorithm for reasoning with singly connected Bayesian networks is applied to a network with loops, the algorithm is no longer guaranteed to result in exact probabilities. We identify the two types of error that can arise in the probabilities yielded by the algorithm: the cycling error and the convergence error. We then focus on the cycling error and analyse its effect on the decisiveness of the approximations that are computed for the inner nodes of simple loops. More specifically, we detail the factors that induce the cycling error to push the exact probabilities towards over- or underconfident approximations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Palo Alto, 1988

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. G.F. Cooper. The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian belief networks. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 393–405, 1990

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Dagum, M. Luby. Approximate inference in Bayesian networks is NP hard. Artificial Intelligence, 60, 141–153, 1993

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Murphy, Y. Weiss, M. Jordan. Loopy belief propagation for approximate inference: an empirical study. In K.B. Laskey, H. Prade (editors) Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, 467–475, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  5. B.J. Frey. Bayesian Networks for Pattern Classification, Data Compression and Channel Coding. MIT Press, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Mackay, R.M. Neal. Good codes based on very sparse matrices. In C. Boyd (editor) Cryptography and Coding: 5th SIAM Conference. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, 1025, 100–111, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Weiss. Interpreting images by propagating Bayesian beliefs. In M.C. Mozer, M.I. Jordan, T. Petsche (editors) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 9, 908–915, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Weiss. Correctness of local probability propagation in graphical models with loops. Neural Computation, 12, 1–41, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Weiss, W.T. Freeman. Correctness of belief propagation in Gaussian graphical models of arbitrary topology. Neural Computation, 13, 2173–2200, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J.H. Bolt, L.C. van der Gaag. The convergence error in loopy propagation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Advances in Intelligent Systems: Theory and Applications, in cooperation with the IEEE computer society, Luxembourg, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Strang. Linear Algebra and Its Applications..Academic Press, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.P. Wellman. Fundamental concepts of qualitative probabilistic networks. Artificial Intelligence, 44, 257–303, 1990

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. M.P. Wellman, M. Henrion. Qualitative intercausal relations, or explaining "explaining away". In KR-91, Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Second International Conference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Menlo Park, California, 535–546, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.J. Druzdzel. Probabilistic Reasoning in Decision Support Systems: From Computationto Common Sense. PhD thesis, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.J. Druzdzel, M. Henrion. Efficient reasoning in qualitative probabilistic networks. In Proceedings of the Eleventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, 548–553, 1993

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bolt, J.H., van der Gaag, L.C. (2007). Decisiveness in Loopy Propagation. In: Lucas, P., Gámez, J.A., Salmerón, A. (eds) Advances in Probabilistic Graphical Models. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 213. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68996-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68996-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68994-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68996-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics