Portable Imaging Systems for Interactive Teaching of Radiography, Computed Tomography and Ultrasound Imaging Principles

  • J. J. BattistaEmail author
  • T. L. Poepping

In this age of rapid medical and technological advancements, institutions are recognizing the need for interdisciplinary training. In a recent article (Hendee 2007), the need for more extensive physics education during a clinical residency in diagnostic imaging has been emphasized. Corrective measures have been recommended by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine and the Radiological Society of North America to address the growing gap between knowledge base and digital-imaging technology.


Compute Tomography Number Compute Tomography System Portable Image System Compute Tomography Reconstruction Optical Projection Tomography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Babic S, Battista J, Jordan K (2008) Three-dimensional dose verification for intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the radiological physics centre head-and-neck phantom using optical computed tomography scans of ferrous xylenol-orange gel dosimeters. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70:1281–1291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Doran SJ, Krstaji N (2006) The history and principles of optical computed tomography for scanning 3-D radiation dosimeters. Fourth international conference on radiotherapy gel dosimetry, Institute of Physics. J Phys Conf Ser 56:45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Earl GF (2002) Technical note: USAF 1951 and microscopy resolution test charts (30 Nov. 2002), Accessed March 3, 2007
  4. Ertugrul N (1998) New era in engineering experiments: An integrated interactive teaching/ learning approach and real time visualisations. Int J Eng Educ 14:344–355Google Scholar
  5. Handelsman J, Ebert-May D, Beichner R et al (2004) Scientific teaching. Science 304:521–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hendee WR (2007) Improving physics education in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 4:555–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hyde DE, Habets DF, Fox AJ, Gulka I, Kalapos P, Lee DH, Pelz DM, Holdsworth DW (2007) Comparison of maximum intensity projection and digitally reconstructed radiographic projection for carotid artery stenosis measurement. Med Phys 34:2968–2974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kak AC, Slaney M (2001) Principles of computerized tomographic imaging, published by Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) and available on-line at Accessed March 3, 2007
  9. Lin B (2008) Nothing too theoretical about this physics class. UBC Reports 54(3). Accessed April 3, 2008
  10. Poepping TL, Nikolov HN, Thorne ML, Holdsworth DW (2004) A thin-walled carotid vessel phantom for Doppler ultrasound flow studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 30:1067–1078PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rickey DW, Picot PA, Christopher DA, Fenster A (1995) A wall-less vessel phantom for Doppler ultrasound studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 21:1163–1176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sharpe J, Ahlgren U, Perry P, Hill B, Ross A, Hecksher-Sørensen J, Baldock R, Davidson D (2002) Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies. Science 296:541–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Yang WT, Carkaci S, Chen L, Lai C, Sahin A, Whitman G, Shaw C (2007) Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Feasibility study with surgical mastectomy specimens. Am J Roentgenol 189:1312–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zinke-Allmang M (2009) Physics for the Life Sciences. Nelson Education Ltd, Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical BiophysicsThe University of Western OntarioCanada
  2. 2.Department of Physics & AstronomyThe University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations