Skip to main content

Flow, Mixture Preparation and Combustion in Direct-Injection Two-Stroke Gasoline Engines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Flow and Combustion in Reciprocating Engines

Part of the book series: Experimental Fluid Mechanics ((FLUID))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The factor-of-two advantage that one might expect at first glance is not achieved in practice for several reasons, including the lower effective compression ratio at which two-stroke engines typically operate [32, 34].

  2. 2.

    Intake and exhaust tuning effects are very important in two-stroke engines at high speeds and loads and in multicylinder configurations [32, 34], but will not be discussed here.

  3. 3.

    Throttling a crankcase-compression two-stroke engine reduces the amount of air that is admitted to the crankcase and hence that is available to scavenge the cylinder, but throttling only slightly affects the density and hence the mass of the gas that is trapped in the cylinder when all the ports have been covered. Thus throttling primarily alters the residual fraction (and the amount of incoming fuel in a premixed-charge engine).

  4. 4.

    This need not be an issue if the two-stroke engine is externally scavenged with a blower driven from the crankshaft. Blower-driven scavenging also permits use of a conventional one-piece crankshaft and wet-sump lubrication.

  5. 5.

    Short circuiting can contribute substantially to DI2S engine-out HCs at the heaviest loads where (as discussed momentarily) injection must be advanced substantially [35].

  6. 6.

    By contrast, in premixed-charge four-stroke engines (see chapter 1), the dominant HC emissions mechanism is the storage and release of fuel trapped in combustion-chamber crevices, in particular the piston top-ring-land crevice [30].

  7. 7.

    In automotive applications, in-cylinder NO formation tends to be intrinsically lower in a two-stroke engine because, for a given vehicle power requirement, it operates at roughly half the engine load as its four-stroke counterpart, and NO formation is a strongly non-linear function of temperature and hence of engine load [35].

  8. 8.

    Delivery ratio, a measure of overall engine air flow through a two-stroke engine, is defined as the fraction of a displacement volume of fresh air at ambient conditions that is delivered to the cylinder each cycle.

  9. 9.

    With this mode of data acquisition, photon-correlation LDV is also intrinsically corrected to first order for velocity-sampling bias (more fast particles cross the measurement volume per unit time than slow ones) [62].

  10. 10.

    Even with photon correlation, usable single-burst LDV measurements require at least ˜1 detected photon per Doppler cycle.

  11. 11.

    This also implies a high residual fraction at part load, as mentioned earlier.

  12. 12.

    In-cylinder velocities in two-stroke engines with external scavenging driven by a blower connected to the crankshaft do scale with engine speed.

  13. 13.

    A reference velocity based on, say, delivered air mass per cycle, ambient air density and total port area, i.e., \(\overline{V}_{ref} = \dot{M}_{del}/\rho_{amb}A_{port}\), might appear to be preferable to \(\overline{V}_{P}\)for two-stroke engines. Note, however, that any reference velocity that involves air mass per engine cycle implicitly involves engine speed and is hence proportional to mean piston speed. For the example here, the mass of air delivered per cycle \(\dot{M}_{del}=\rho_{amb} \eta_{del} V_{D}N\), where \(\eta_{del}\) is the delivery ratio, and \(V_{D}\)is the displacement volume. But \(\overline{V}_{D}= A_{bore}S\), where\(A_{bore}\) is the bore area, and hence \(\overline{V}_{ref} = \eta_{del}(A_{bore}/A_{port})\overline{V}_{P}/2\). For the present work, \(A_{port}=\) 19.9 cm2, so \(\overline{V}_{ref}=\) 3.35 m/s.

  14. 14.

    The ideal (discharge coefficient = 1) port-efflux velocity when the transfer ports are first uncovered could be evaluated from the orifice-flow equations and used as a reference velocity that is independent of engine speed. This approach requires conditions in the crankcase at port opening to be assumed, measured or calculated. For this study, the crankcase pressure data yield \(\overline{V}_{port, ideal}\) ≈ 250 m/s. Such a reference velocity might be useful for comparing flows between two-stroke engines, but it seems unlikely to be helpful for comparing in-cylinder velocities between two- and four-stroke engines.

  15. 15.

    The LDV data suggest that jets from opposing ports arrive at the symmetry plane at slightly different times, which could be due to small differences in port heights. A slightly tilted piston would have much the same effect [54].

  16. 16.

    This vidicon system was vastly inferior to the slow-scan, intensified CCD camera used later for the fuel LIF imaging described in §4, and we will therefore not try the reader's patience with its idiosynchrasies. For details, consult [68].

  17. 17.

    We use the terms “intake port” and the more correct “transfer port” synonymously.

  18. 18.

    At least some of the fuel behind the flame front may have undergone thermal decomposition or partial oxidization.

  19. 19.

    Clearly the actual fuel distribution at 40° BTDC extends beyond the front and rear laser-sheet positions used to obtain the series of LIF images for Fig. 2.24.

  20. 20.

    This assumption is supported by fuel LIF in the residual gases, which shows very rapid mixing when the fresh scavenging air reaches the combustion chamber and a nearly uniform distribution of residual fuel in the combustion chamber immediately before the start of injection [80].

  21. 21.

    More recent DI4S research indicates that in cases with large cycle-to-cycle variation in the equivalence ratio near the spark gap, the ensemble-mean equivalence ratio near the gap must be biased somewhat rich (e.g., \(\langle \phi \rangle\) ≈ 1.5) in order to avoid lean misfires and partial burns [100].

  22. 22.

    To first order, the impulsive scavenging flow scales with delivery ratio but not with engine speed in a crankcase-compression-scavenged engine (Sec. 2.3.4.1), whereas the piston-motion-driven squish flow does scale with engine speed.

  23. 23.

    To reduce window fouling and interferences due to combustion luminosity and LIF from combustion-chamber deposits, isooctane fuel was used for most of the LIF imaging.

  24. 24.

    The NO number density and the NO collisional quenching rate both increase linearly with pressure, so the NO LIF intensity for a fixed NO concentration is reasonably independent of pressure, apart from pressure shifts and broadening effects (Sec. 2.5.2.2).

  25. 25.

    Appreciable absorption by hot CO2 as well as by transient hydrocarbon species is implied by our observation that the absorption begins earlier in the engine cycle (before ignition, in fact) and lasts longer when the engine is fueled with gasoline rather than with isooctane. Furthermore, the difference between the mass-averaged cylinder gas temperatures with the two fuels is fairly small (˜50 K in peak temperature).

  26. 26.

    NO LIF excitation from the first vibrationally excited level of the electronic ground state [X2∏(v′′=1)] at 248-nm wavelength suffers much less from these absorption effects, but the LIF signal strengh is then proportional to the temperature-dependent population of the v′′=1 level, which must be taken into account [112, 113].

  27. 27.

    This approach probably overestimates the incidence of misfires and partial burns because the spark can enflame gases from a somewhat larger region than the ~0.4 mm3 volume examined here, and the ˜1 ms spark duration is, moreover, sufficient for fuel-air mixture to reach the spark gap from some distance away, depending on the local velocity field [100, 115]. Furthermore, the relatively long spark duration allows significant stretching of the discharge itself [116].

  28. 28.

    Pumping losses in crankcase-compression-scavenged two-stroke engines increase with load (strictly speaking, with delivered air), while they decrease with load for conventional four-stroke SI engines.

References

  1. D. Scott and J. Yamaguchi, “Pneumatic Fuel Injection Spurs Two-Stroke Revival,” Automotive Engineering, 94, 74, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Duret, A. Ecomard, and M. Audinet, “A New Two-Stroke Engine with Compressed-Air Fuel Injection for High Efficiency Low Emissions Applications,” SAE Paper 880176, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Schlunke, “Der Orbital Verbrennungsprozess des Zweitaktmotors,” 10th International Motor Symposium, Vienna, VDI No. 122, April 1989, pp. 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.A. Smith and S.R. Ahern, “The Orbital Ultra Low Emissions and Fuel Economy Engine,” 14th Vienna Motorsymposium, VDI No. 182, pp. 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Brooke and P.J. Mullins, “To Stroke … Or Not Two Stroke,” Automotive Industries, May 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Brooks, “Clean Air Fuels Engine Evolution, Not Revolution,” Ward’s Auto World, June 1991, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F.A. Wyczalek, “Two-Stroke Engine Technology for Passenger Car Automobiles,” SAE Paper 912474, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Brooke, “Two-Stroke Showdown,” Automotive Industries, April 1993, pp. 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Brooks, “GM Winding Down 2-Stroke Engine Program,” Ward’s Engine & Vehicle Technology Update, April 1994, pp. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Brooks, “Ford Straying from Orbital’s 2-Stroke Technology,” Ward’s Engine & Vehicle Technology Update, July 1994, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Buchholz, “Chrysler Updates Two-Stroke Engine Progress,” Automotive Engineering, January 1997, p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Brooks, “EU Invests in 2-Stroke Technology,” Ward’s Engine & Vehicle Technology Update, July 1998, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Scott, “Euro 2-Stroke Project Packs Novel Technology,” Ward’s Engine & Vehicle Technology Update, Sep. 1998, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Personnaz and C. Stan, “Car Hybrid Propulsion Strategy Using an Ultra-Light GDI Two-Stroke Engine,” SAE Paper 1999-01-2940.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Duret et al., “The Air Assisted Direct Injection ELEVATE Automotive Engine Combustion System,” SAE Paper 2000-01-1899.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Shawcross, C. Pumphrey, and D. Arnall, “A Five-Million Kilometre, 100-Vehicle Fleet Trial of an Air-Assist Direct Fuel Injected Automotive 2-Stroke Engine,” SAE Paper 2000-01-0898.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Brooks, “Mercury/Orbital Team Ready with Strat-Charge Outboard,” Ward’s Engine & Vehicle Technology Update, Mar. 1996, p.3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Brooks, “Outboard Marine Introduces First DI Outboards,” Ward’s Engine & Vehicle Technology Update, July 1996, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Brooks, “Low Emissions Outboards: Big Success,” Ward’s Engine & Vehicle Technology Update, Sep. 1998, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Strauss, Y. Zeng, and D.T. Montgomery, “Optimization of the E-TEC™ Combustion System for Direct-Injected, Two-Stroke Engines Toward 3-Star Emissions,” SAE Paper 2003-32-0007.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Popular Science, 252, 18, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.E. Johnson and H.-C. Wong, “Electronic Direct Fuel Injection System Applied to an 1100-cc Two-Stroke Personal Watercraft Engine,” SAE Paper 980756, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  23. “Kawasaki Signs Agreement with Outboard Marine Corporation to Equip Personal Watercraft with FICHT Fuel Injection,” PR Newswire, April 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. Arnone et al., “Development of a Direct Injection Two-Stroke Engine for Scooters,” SAE Paper 2001-01-1782.

    Google Scholar 

  25. N. Bradbury et al., “University of Idaho’s Clean Snowmobile Design Using a Direct-Injection Two-Stroke,” SAE Paper 2005-01-3680.

    Google Scholar 

  26. N. Lorenz, T. Bauer, and B. Willson, “Design of a Direct Injection Retrofit Kit for Small Two-Stroke Engines,” JSAE Paper 20056601/SAE Paper 2005-32-0095.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J.C. Dabadie et al., “DI Two-Stroke Engine Catalyst Development for 2 Wheelers Application,” SAE Paper 2001-01-1847.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Strauss and Y. Zeng, “The Effect of Fuel Spray Momentum on Performance and Emissions of Direct-Injected, Two-Stroke Engines,” SAE Paper 2004-32-0013.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Cromas and J.B. Ghandhi, “Particulate Emissions from a Direct-Injection, Spark-Ignition Engine,” SAE Paper 2005-01-0103.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.B. Heywood, Internal Combustion Fundamentals, McGraw Hill, Inc., New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. Ferguson, Internal Combustion Engines: Applied Thermosciences, Wiley, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  32. G.P. Blair, The Basic Design of Two-Stroke Engines, SAE, Warrendale, PA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  33. G.P. Blair, Design and Simulation of Two-Stroke Engines, SAE, Warrendale, PA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J.B. Heywood and E. Sher, The Two-Stroke Cycle Engine: Its Development, Operation and Design, Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. P. Duret and J.-F. Moreau, “Reduction of Pollutant Emissions of the IAPAC Two-Stroke Engine with Compressed Air Assisted Fuel Injection, SAE Paper 900801, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  36. H.R. Ricardo, “Recent Research Work on the Internal Combustion Engine,” SAE Transactions, 14, 30–32, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  37. F.-Q. Zhao, D.L. Harrington, and M.-C. Lai, Automotive Gasoline Direct-Injection Engines, SAE, Warrendale, PA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  38. M.C. Drake and D.C. Haworth, “Advanced Gasoline Engine Development Using Optical Diagnostics and Numerical Modeling,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31, 99–124, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Y. Iwamoto, K. Noma, O. Nakayama, T. Yamauchi, and H. Ando, “Development of Gasoline Direct Injection Engine,” SAE Paper 970541, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  40. T. Kume, Y. Iwamoto, K. Iida, N. Murakami, K. Akishino, and H. Ando, “Combustion Control Technologies for Direct Injection SI Engines,” SAE Paper 960600, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  41. T. Tomoda, S. Sasaki, D. Sawada, A. Saito, and H. Sami, “Development of Direct Injection Gasoline Engine – Study of Stratified Mixture Formation,” SAE Paper 970539, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. Harada, T. Tomita, H. Mizuno, Z. Mashiki, and Y. Ito, “Development of Direct-Injection Gasoline Engine,” SAE Paper 970540, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  43. M.C. Drake, T.D. Fansler, A.S. Solomon, and G.A. Szekely, “Piston Fuel Films as a Source of Smoke and Hydrocarbon Emissions from a Wall-Controlled SIDI Engine,” SAE Paper 2003-01-0547.

    Google Scholar 

  44. C.D. Wood, “Unthrottled Open-Chamber Stratified-Charge Engines,” SAE Paper 780341, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  45. M. Alperstein, G. Schafer, and F. Villforth, “Texaco’s Stratified Charge Engine: Multifuel, Efficient, Clean and Practical,” SAE Paper 740563, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  46. A.J. Scussel, A.O. Simko, and W.R. Wade, “The Ford PROCO Engine Update,” SAE Paper 780699, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  47. D.R. Lancaster, “Diagnostic Investigation of Hydrocarbon Emissions from a Direct-Injection Stratified-Charge Engine with Early Injection,” I. Mech. E. Paper C397-80, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  48. H. Schäpertöns, K.-D. Emmenthal, H.-J. Grabe, and W. Oppermann, “VW’s Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) Research Engine,” SAE Paper 910054, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  49. A. Waltner, et al., “Die Zukunftstechnologie des Ottomotors: strahlgefhrte Direkteinspritzung mit Piezo-Injektor,” 27, Internationales Wienermotoren Symposium, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  50. F. Altenschmidt, et al., “The analysis of the ignition process on SI-engines with direct injection in stratified mode,” 7th Intl. Symp. Internal Combustion Diagnostics, Baden-Baden, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  51. J. Fisher, et al., “Methods for the Development of the Spray Guided BMW DI Combustion System,” 7th Intl. Symp. Internal Combustion Diagnostics, Baden-Baden, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  52. P. Langen, et al., “Neue BMW Sechs- und Vierzylinder-Ottomotoren mit High Precision Injection und Schichtbrennverfahren,” 28. Internationales Wienermotoren Symposium, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  53. A. Jante, “Scavenging and Other Problems of Two-Stroke-Cycle Spark-Ignition Engines,” SAE Trans Vol. 77, SAE Paper 680468, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  54. T.D. Fansler and D.T. French, “The Scavenging Flow Field in a Crankcase-Compression Two-Stroke Engine – A Three-Dimensional Laser-Velocimetry Survey,” SAE Paper 920417, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  55. T.D. Fansler and D.T. French, “High-Speed Flow Measurements in a Two-Stroke Engine by Photon-Correlation Laser Velocimetry,” Applied Optics, 32, 3846–3854, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  56. A.A. Amsden et al., “Comparison of Computed and Measured Three-Dimensional Velocity Fields in a Motored Two-Stroke Engine,” SAE Paper 920418, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  57. D.C. Haworth, M.S. Huebler, S.H. El Tahry, and W.R. Matthes, “Multidimensional Calculations for a Two-Stroke-Cycle Engine: A Detailed Scavenging Model Validation,” SAE Paper 932712, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  58. T.W. Kuo and R.D. Reitz, “Three-Dimensional Computations of Combustion in Premixed-Charge and Fuel-Injected Two-Stroke Engines,” SAE Paper 920425, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  59. T.D. Fansler, “Photon-Correlation Laser Velocimetry in Reciprocating Engine Research,” in Photon-Correlation Techniques and Applications, J.B. Abbiss and A.E. Smart, eds., Vol. 1 of OSA Conf. Proc. Series (Optical Soc. Amer., Washington, DC, 1988), pp. 54–77.

    Google Scholar 

  60. T.E. Hepner, “State-of-the-Art Laser Doppler Velocimeter Processors: Calibration and Evaluation,” AIAA Paper 94-0042, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Y. Ikeda and T. Nakajima, “Burst Digital Correlator as Laser-Doppler Velocimetry Signal Processor,” Applied Optics, 35, 3243–3249, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. J.B. Abbiss, “The Structure of the Doppler-Difference Signal and the Analysis of Its Autocorrelation Function,” Physica Scripta, 19, 399–395, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. C. Arcoumanis and J.H. Whitelaw, “Fluid Mechanics of Internal Combustion Engines – A Review,” Proc. I. Mech. E., 201, 57–74, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  64. L.A. Melton, “Spectrally Separated Fluorescence Emissions for Diesel Fuel Droplets and Vapor,” Applied Optics, 22, 2224–2226, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. L.A. Melton and J.F. Verdieck, “Vapor/Liquid Visualization for Fuel Sprays,” Combust. Sci. & Tech., 42, 217–222, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. M.E.A. Bardsley, P.G. Felton, and F.V. Bracco, “2-D Visualization of Liquid and Vapor Fuel in an I.C. Engine,” SAE Paper 880521, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  67. M.E.A. Bardsley, P.G. Felton, and F.V. Bracco, “2-D Visualization of a Hollow-Cone Spray in a Cup-in-Head, Ported, I.C. Engine,” SAE Paper 890315, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  68. R. Diwakar et al., “Liquid and Vapor Fuel Distributions from an Air-Assist Injector – An Experimental and Computational Study,” SAE Paper 920422, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  69. P.G. Felton, F.V. Bracco, and M.E.A. Bardsley, “On the Quantitative Application of Exciplex Fluorescence to Engine Sprays,” SAE Paper 930870, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  70. J.M. Desantes, J.V. Pastor, J.M. Pastor, and J.E. Julia, “Limitations on the Use of the Planar Laser Induced Exciplex Fluorescence Technique in Diesel Sprays,” Fuel, 84, 2301–2315, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. L.A. Melton, “Exciplex-Based Vapor/Liquid Visualization Systems Appropriate for Automotive Gasolines,” Appl. Spectrosc., 47, 782, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. J.B. Ghandhi, P.G. Felton, B. Gajdezcko, and F.V. Bracco, “Investigation of the Fuel Distribution in a Two-Stroke Engine with an Air-Assisted Injector,” SAE Paper 940394, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  73. A.P. Fröba et al., “Mixture of Triethylamine (TEA) and Benzene as a New Seeding Material for the Quantitative Two-Dimensional Laser-Induced Exciplex Fluorescence Imaging of Vapor and Liquid Fuel Inside SI Engines,” Combust. Flame, 112, 199–209, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. A.A. Rotunno, M. Winter, G.M. Dobbs, and L.A. Melton, “Direct Calibrations Procedures for Exciplex-Based Vapor/Liquid Visualization of Fuel Sprays,” Combust. Sci. & Tech., 71, 247–261, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. C.-N. Yeh, T. Kamimoto, H. Kosaka, and S. Kobori, “Quantitative Measurement of 2-D Fuel Vapor Concentration in a Transient Spray via Laser-Induced Fluorescence Technique,” SAE Paper 941953, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  76. R.S. Schafer, “The Development of an Improved Quantitative Calibration for an Exciplex Liquid/Vapor Visualization System,” in Laser Applications in Combustion and Combustion Diagnostics II, SPIE Vol. 2122, p. 61, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  77. P. Wieske, S. Wissel, G. Grünefeld, and S. Pischinger, “Improvement of LIEF by Wavelength-Resolved Acquisition of Multiple Images Using a Single CCD Detector – Simultaneous 2D Measurement of Air/Fuel Ratio, Temperature Distribution of the Liquid Phase and Qualitative Distribution of the Liquid Phase with the Multi-2D Technique,” Appl. Phys. B, 83, 323–329, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. E. Giffen and A. Muraszew, The Atomisation of Liquid Fuels, Wiley, New York, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  79. T.D. Fansler, D.T. French, and M.C. Drake, “Fuel Distributions in a Firing Direct-Injection Spark-Ignition Engine Using Laser-Induced Fluorescence Imaging,” SAE Paper 950110, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  80. M.C. Drake, T.D. Fansler, and D.T. French, “Crevice Flow and Combustion Visualization in a Direct-Injection Spark-Ignition Engine using Laser Imaging Techniques,” SAE Paper 952454, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  81. M.C. Drake, D.T. French, and T.D. Fansler, “Advanced Diagnostics for Minimizing Hydrocarbon Emissions from a Direct-Injection Gasoline Engine,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 26, 2581–2587, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  82. T.D. Fansler, D.T. French, and M.C. Drake, “Individual-Cycle Measurements of Exhaust-Hydrocarbon Mass from a Direct-Injection Two-Stroke Engine,” SAE Paper 980758, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  83. J.A. Gatowski, E.N. Balles, K.M. Chun, F.E. Nelson, J.A. Ekchian, and J.B. Heywood, “Heat Release Analysis of Engine Pressure Data,” SAE Paper 841359, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  84. C.A. Poynton, A Technical Introduction to Digital Video, Wiley, New York, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  85. T.A. Baritaud and R.M. Green, “A 2-D Flame Visualization Technique Applied to the I.C. Engine,” SAE Paper 860025, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  86. A.O. zur Loye and F.V. Bracco, “Two-Dimensional Visualization of Premixed-Charge Combustion Flame Structure in an IC Engine,” SAE Paper 870454, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  87. G.F.W. Ziegler, A. Zettlitz, P. Meinhardt, R. Herweg, R. Maly, and W. Pfister, “Cycle-Resolved Two-Dimensional Flame Visualization in a Spark-Ignition Engine,” SAE Paper 881634, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  88. M.D. DiRosa, K.G. Klavuhn, and R.K Hanson, “LIF Spectroscopy of NO and O2 in High-Pressure Flames,” Combust. Sci. Tech., 118, 257–283, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. M.C. Drake and J.W. Ratcliffe, “High-Temperature Quenching Cross Sections for Nitric Oxide Laser-Induced Fluorescence Measurements,” J. Chem. Phys., 98, 3850, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. T.B. Settersten, B.D. Patterson, and J.A. Gray, “Temperature- and Species-Dependent Quenching of NO A2∑(v′=0) Probed by Two-Photon Laser-Induced Fluorescence Using a Picosecond Laser,” J. Chem. Phys., 124, 234308, 2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. J.R. Reisel, C.D. Carter, N.M. Laurendeau, and M.C. Drake, “Laser-Induced Fluorescence Measurements in Laminar, Flat C2H6/O2/N2 Flames at Atmospheric Pressure,” Combust. Sci. Tech., 91, 271, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. F. Hildenbrand, C. Schulz, V. Sick, G. Josefsson, I. Magnusson, Ö. Andersson, and M. Aldén, “Laser-Spectroscopic Investigation of Flow Fields and NO Formation in a Realistic SI Engine,” SAE Paper 980148, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  93. A.J. Giovanetti et al., “Analysis of Hydrocarbon Emissions in a Direct-Injection Spark-Ignition Engine,” SAE Paper 830587, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  94. R.M. Frank and J.B. Heywood, “Combustion Characterization in a Direct-Injection Stratified-Charge Engine and Implications on Hydrocarbon Emissions,” SAE Paper 892058, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  95. E.W. Rothe and P. Andresen, “Application of Tunable Excimer Lasers to Combustion Diagnostics: A Review,” Applied Optics, 36, 3971–4033, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. C. Schulz and V. Sick, “Tracer LIF Diagnostics: Quantitative Measurement of Fuel Concentration, Temperature and Fuel/Air Ratio in Practical Combustion Systems,” Progr. Energy Combust. Sci., 31, 75–121, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. J. Reboux, D. Peuchberty, and F. Dionnet, “A New Approach of Planar Laser Induced Fluorescence Applied to Fuel/Air Ratio Measurement in the Compression Stroke of an Optical S.I. Engine,” SAE Paper 941988, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  98. F. Grossmann, P.B. Monkhouse, M. Ridder, V. Sick, and J. Wolfrum, “Temperature and Pressure Dependences of the Laser-Induced Fluorescence of Gas-Phase Acetone and 3-pentanone,” Appl. Phys. B, 62, 249–253, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. J.B. Ghandhi and P.G. Felton, “On the Fluorescent Behavior of Ketones at High Temperatures,” Expts. in Fluids, 21, 143–144, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  100. T.D. Fansler, M.C. Drake, B. Stojkovic, and M. Rosalik, “Local Fuel Concentration, Ignition and Combustion in a Stratified Charge Spark Ignited Direct Injection Engine: Spectroscopic, Imaging and Pressure-Based Measurements,” Intl. J. Engine Res., 4, 61–86, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. J.A. Eng, W.R. Leppard, P.M. Najt, and F.L. Dryer, “The Interaction Between Nitric Oxide and Hydrocarbon Oxidation Chemistry in a Spark-Ignition Engine, SAE Paper 972889, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Z. Liu and S.I. Woo, “Recent Advances in Catalytic DeNOx Science and Technology,” Catalysis Reviews, 48, 43–89, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. A.C. Alkidas, “Combustion-Chamber Crevices: The Major Source of Engine-Out Hydrocarbon Emissions Under Fully Warmed Conditions,” Progr. Energy Combust. Sci., 25, 253–273, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. E. Hudak and J.B. Ghandhi, “Time-Resolved Exhaust Sampling Measurements of a Two-Stroke Direct-Injection Engine,” SAE Paper 1999-01-3309.

    Google Scholar 

  105. X. Liu and D.B. Kittelson, “Total Cylinder Sampling from a Diesel Engine (Part II),” SAE Paper 820360, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  106. A. Bräumer, V. Sick, J. Wolfrum, V. Drewes, M. Zahn, and R. Maly, “Quantitative Two-Dimensional Measurements of Nitric Oxide and Temperature Distributions in a Transparent Square-Piston SI Engine,” SAE Paper 952462, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  107. C. Schulz, V. Sick, J. Wolfrum, V. Drewes, M. Zahn, and R. Maly, “Quantitative 2D Single-Shot Imaging of NO Concentrations and Temperatures in a Transparent SI Engine,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 26, 2597–2604, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  108. P. Andresen, G. Meier, H. Schluter, H. Voges, A. Koch, W. Hentschel, W. Operman, and E. Rothe, “Fluorescence Imaging Inside an Internal Combustion Engine Using Tunable Excimer Lasers,” Applied Optics, 29, 2393, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. W.G. Bessler et al., “Quantitative In-cylinder NO-LIF Imaging in a Realistic Gasoline Engine with Spray-Guided Direct Injection,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 30, 2667–2674, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. B. Alatas, J.A. Pinson, T.A. Litzinger, and D.A. Santavicca, “A Study of NO and Soot Evolution in a DI Diesel Engine via Planar Imaging,” SAE Paper 930973, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  111. F. Hildenbrand, C. Schulz, E. Wagner, and V. Sick, “Investigation of Spatially Resolved Light Absorption in a Spark-Ignition Engine Fueled with Propane/Air,” Applied Optics, 38, 1452–1458, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. C. Schulz, V. Sick, U.E. Meier, J. Heinze, and W. Stricker, “Quantification of NO A–X(0,2) Laser-Induced Fluorescence: Investigation of Calibration and Collisional Influences in High-Pressure Flames,” Applied Optics, 38, 1434–1443, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. W.G. Bessler et al., “Strategies for Laser-Induced Fluorescence Detection of Nitric Oxide in High-Pressure Flames. III. Comparison of A–X Excitation Schemes,” Applied Optics, 42, 4922–4936, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. J.E. Dec and R.E. Canaan, “PLIF Imaging of NO Formation in a DI Diesel Engine,” SAE Paper 980147, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  115. J.B. Ghandhi and F.V. Bracco, “Fuel Distribution Effects on the Combustion of a Direct-Injection Stratified-Charge Engine,” SAE Paper 950460, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  116. T.D. Fansler, M.C. Drake, I. Düwel, and F. Zimmermann, “Fuel-Spray and Spark-Plug Interactions in a Spray-Guided Direct-Injection Gasoline Engine,” Proc. 7th Intl. Symp. on Internal Combustion Diagnostics, Baden-Baden, Germany, May 18–19, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

D.T. French collaborated in all the experimental work described in this chapter. We are also grateful to E.D. Klomp for valuable advice on the individual-cycle exhaust mass flow calculations, to P. Meernik and G. Lalonde for advice on installing and calibrating the fast FID, and to P.M. Najt and A.S.P. Solomon for providing the heat-release code as well as tutelage in its use. E.G. Groff and P.E. Reinke, who (together with R.A. Bolton) led the GM two-stroke-engine project at the operational level, provided much helpful information on engine-system and vehicle issues. In addition, the following colleagues generously shared data and insight obtained through their extensive experimental work on two- and four-stroke DI stratified-charge engines: W.C. Albertson, H.E. Evans, R.M Frank, M.R. Galasso, R.M. Otto, K.B. Rober, A.J. Shearer, and L.H. Weinand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fansler, T.D., Drake, M.C. (2008). Flow, Mixture Preparation and Combustion in Direct-Injection Two-Stroke Gasoline Engines. In: Arcoumanis, C., Kamimoto, T. (eds) Flow and Combustion in Reciprocating Engines. Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68901-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68901-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64142-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68901-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics