Skip to main content

The discourse of social responsibility invades and becomes institutionalized in contemporary society — and not only in Brazil — creating different forms and instruments through which the negative effects of modernity and capitalism can be minimized. One of these instruments legitimizes itself by its legal character — a group of laws, norms, and juridical means that regulate corporate responsibility. Within this perspective, the concept of social responsibility would be restricted to the concept of regulated responsibility. Thus, it can be observed that in the literature the innumerable “faces” presented as social responsibility, indicating a difference in terms of the concept: many meanings, interpretations, and possibilities. Since there is not much clarity, many actions can be classified as social ones. However, the truth is that they tend to be more regulated actions or another component of management.

Briefly, this paper aims to identify and provide understanding to the discursive practices about social responsibility in Brazil. The idea was to analyze the institutionalized practices and how the discourse is configured in that country.

In Brazil, one could observe the different approaches taken about the field of corporate social responsibility. During the 1960s, the attitude taken by Brazilian corporate entities was that “the problem didn't exist”; by the 1970s, there was a general acceptance that “the problem exists, but it is not mine”; by the 1980s the view changes to that of, “the problem exists, and I know how to solve it”… and today, with all the social problems in the country and pressures from various sources, Brazilian companies are concerned about the problem and how to solve it from its very source. In this sense, one can argue that Brazilian society is more participative and more pro-active about the subject of CSR than ever before.

Presently, the configuration of corporate social responsibility in Brazil is changing as a result of the sustainability discourse, there are many critical positive aspects of CRS, especially those concerning social and philanthropic actions. The main argument is that taking a social action does not necessarily mean being socially responsible, since the action is simply philanthropic and does not produce sustainability.

Finally, one can conclude that social responsibility in Brazil is a discourse that is under construction. Therefore, there is an opportunity to reflect and to learn more about it. Nowadays, social responsibility is shared among social actors and Brazilian civil society is more concerned about the need for sustainable development. Brazilians are more conscious of irresponsible social practices and would put pressure on the government, corporate entities, and individuals in order to produce sustainable development. In this sense, we concur with José Gabriel López, from Ford Foundation, who pointed out the need to develop new models for development that promote equity, social justice and sound environmental stewardship. It is a challenge for everyone, regardless of whether Brazilians or some other nationals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashley, Patricia Almeida (Org.) (2002) Ètica e Responsabilidade Social nos negócios. 01 Ed. São Paulo: Saraiva. Ballalai, Roberto (1989) Notas e subsídios para a análise do discurso: uma contribuição a leitura do discurso da administração. Forum educ., Rio de Janeiro, v. 13, n.1–2, p. 56–80, 1°/2° trim. fev./mai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, Chester (1939) The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. & Chiapello, Ève. (2002) El nuevo espíritu del capitalismo.Madrid, Espanha: Editorial Akal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, Howard, R. (1953) Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper Brothers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camargo, Aspásia; João Paulo Ribeiro Capobianco & Jose Antonio Puppim de Oliveira (2007). The state of Brazilian environment 1992–2002: a view from civil society. Rio de Janeiro: CIDS/EBAPE/FGV/ISA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999) Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct, Business & Society, Vol. 38(3), pp. 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Neil (2001). The politics of the environment. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Andrew. (2000) Redirecting critique in postmodern organization studies: the perspective of Foucault. Organization Studies, 21(6), p.1059–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. M. (1939) Social control of business, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claro, Priscila Borin de Oliveira; Claro, Danny Pimentel & Amâncio, Robson, (2005). Entendemos Sustentabilidade em sua Plenitude? Análise de Fatores que Influenciam a Interpretação do Conceito. ANPAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, David (2000) Empresa e sociedade: pressão social e relações com a comunidade e o meio ambiente. Revista Exame, vol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of European Communities (2001) Definition of CSR: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ csr/index_en.htm first accessed in 2001.

  • Daudi, P. (1986). Power in the Organisation: The Discourse of Power in Managerial Praxis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, Spring, Vol. 2, pp. 70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, J. et al. (1995) Dicionário de Lingüística. São Paulo: Cultrix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbing, A. and Elbing, C. (1967). The value issue of business, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman (2001). Discurso e mudança social. Brasãlia: Editora UnB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C, Fraedrich, J. & Ferrell, L. (2001). Ética empresarial: dilemas, tomadas de decisões e casos. 4.ed. Rio de Janeiro : Reichmann & Affonso Editores. (Translated by Ruy Jungmann; technical review by Maria Cecilia Coutinho de Arruda).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. (1979) Microfãsica do poder. Rio: Edições Graal (11a reimpressão).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility, California Management Review, Spring, Vol. 2, pp. 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, Antonio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas depesquisa social. São Paulo: Ed. Atlas, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, A. C. A política brasileira em busca da modernidade: na fronteira entre o público e o privado. In SCHWARCZ, L.M. et Al. História da vidaprivada no Brasil — contrastes da intimidade contemporânea. São Paulo: Companhiadas Letras, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, H. (2000). Alem da globalizacao: modelando uma economia global sustentavel, Traducao de Maria Jose Scarpa, Editora Cultrix Sao Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishiname, Roberto; Oded Grajew, Paulo Itacarambi e Carmen Weingrill. Artigo-base sobre responsabilidade socioambiental das empresas. In: CAMARGO, A. e outros (org.) Meio ambiente Brasil: avanços e obstáculos pós Rio-92. Rio de Janeiro: Estação Liberdade, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, T. J. (1940). Measurement of the social performance of business in ‘An investigation of concentration of economic power for temporary national economic committee (Monograph No. 7), Washington DC, US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Theodore. Marketing Myopia. Harvard Business Review (HBR), 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Parra, M. F. and Bandeira, M. L. (2004). Social responsibility in Brazil under construction, in Social responsibility World of Record Pedia, Penang, Ansted Service Center, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litz, R. A. (1996). A resource based view of the socially responsible firm: stakeholder interdependence, ethical awareness and issue responsiveness as strategic assets, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 15(12), pp. 1355–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and Society, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, S. L. A., (2001). Liga Nacionalista de Sao Paulo: ideologia e atuacao. Dissertacao de mestrado, Depto de Hisoria FFLCH-USP, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto, Francisco P. de Melo. & FROES, César. Responsabilidade social e cidadania: a administração do Terceiro Setor. Rio de Janeiro: Qualitymark, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto, Francisco Paulo de Melo; FROES, César. Gestõo da responsabilidade social corporativa: o caso brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Qualitymark, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto, Sydenham Lourenço. Marchas e contra-marchas da intervenéão estatal. Estado, empresariado e burocracia na política siderúrgica brasileira. Tese de doutorado apresentada ao Instituto de Pesquisa do Rio de Janeiro 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, Francisco (1984) “O Surgimento do Antivalor: Capital, Força de Trabalho e Fundo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, José Antônio Puppim de. Um balanço dos balanços sociais das 500 maiores empresas S.A. não-financeiras do Brasil. In: XXVII ENCONTRO NACIONAL DOS PROGRAMAS DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO — ENANPAD (2003: Atibaia, SP). Anais …Rio de Janeiro: Associação Nacional de Programas de Pós-Graduação em Administração, 2003 (Texto Integral em CD-ROM dos Anais do 24° ENANPAD).

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Riordan, Timothy, and Jäger, Jill (Eds.). Politics of climate change in Europe: a European perspective. London: Routledge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passador, Cláudia Souza. A responsabilidade social no Brasil: uma questão em andamento. In: VII Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma Del Estado y de la Administración Pública (2002, Lisboa, Portugal), p. 8–11, Oct. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, David, Anil Markandya and Edward Barbier. Blueprint for a Green Economy. United Kingdom, Earthscan Publications Ltd., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rego, M. L. (2002). A responsabilidade social como resposta do sistema S ao ambienete institucional brasileiro pos-decada de 1990: o caso SESC Rio de Janeiro: Escola Brasileira de Administracao Publica e de Empresas, Centro de Formacao Academica e Pesquisa, (Tese de doutorado).

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Democratizar a Democracia: os caminhos da democracia participativa. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spink, Mary Jane (org.) (2000) Práticas discursivas e produção de sentidos no cotidiano: aproximações teóricas e metodológicas. 2a ed. São Paulo: Cortez.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sucupira, João. A responsabilidade social. Boletim IBASE, 20 de maio de 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, S. Old Issue, New Urgency? In Wisconsin Environmental Dimension, Spring Issue, vol. 1, nr: 1, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenorio, Fernando Guilherme. Flexibilização Organizacional: mito ou realidade? Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenorio, Fernando Guilherme. Tem razão a Administração? Ijuí: Unijuí, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomei, P. A. (1984). Responsabilidade social de empresa: analise qualtativa da opiniao do empressariado nacional. Revista de Administracao de Empresas, Rio de Janeiro, 24(4): 189–202, out./dez.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bandeira, M.L., Parra, F.L. (2009). Brazil: CSR Under Construction. In: Idowu, S.O., Filho, W.L. (eds) Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68815-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics