Skip to main content

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

  • Chapter
Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility

History suggests that the field of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been practiced in the UK for well over two hundred years. Albeit, those actions that are tantamount to the activities now referred to as social responsibility were not previously so described. CSR is a relatively modern term used for all those corporate actions that now fall under its ambit. The UK — a widely acknowledged world leader in the field — has played a pivotal role in recent corporate activities/actions in the field. This chapter explores how UK corporate entities (both profit-seeking and not-for-profit) have been practicing CSR over the last few decades. The paper also discusses the roles that the UK governments have assumed at different times in the field of CSR in the past few centuries. The literature provides a wealth of good-quality studies covering different aspects of CSR by researchers both in the UK and across the world, and this chapter refers to some of these excellent studies. The following questions need to be answered in order to fully understand how the field has developed over its history: What has brought about the recent revival or resurgence of interests in CSR since the 1980s? Why have corporate entities across the globe suddenly realized that CSR is a concept that must be warmly embraced if they wished to compete successfully and survive in modern markets? Why are all these entities ensuring that their stakeholders are aware of all their activities in the field? Answers to these and similar questions can be found not just in the UK chapter but throughout the book. To put it simply, doing ‘good’ is now perceived by all as being trendy and rewarding: if not immediately, then certainly in the longer term. Adam Smith (1776) in his book ‘The Wealth of Nations’ said that “It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our necessities but of their advantage.” Some large UK firms have argued that ‘doing good is good for business’, which perhaps sums it all up. However, the actions of ‘The Abolitionists’ from the 1780s up until 1833 show that altruistic CSR in the UK has a very long history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bloom, P.N. and Gundlach, G.T. (2001), Handbook of Marketing and Society, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1991), The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: towards the moral management of organizational stakeholders, Business Horizons, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1999), Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct, Business and Society, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. and Buchholtz, A.K. (2003), Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, South Western Pub. 5th Edition, Cincinnati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, E., Chapple, W., Moon, J. and Sullivan, M. (2003), CSR in Asia: a seven country study of CSR website reporting, Business and Society, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 415–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. (2003), “Who care wins”, Management Today, January pp. 40–47, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D. (2002) A social critique of corporate reporting, Ashgate, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D. and Rayman-Bacchus, L. (2004), Perspectives in Corporate Social Responsibility, Ashgate, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. A. (2007), The eras and participants of fair trade: an industry structure/stakeholder perspective on the growth of the fair trade industry, Corporate Governance, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 455– 470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2002), Sustainable Development: Achieving a better quality of life, Defra Publications, March, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry (2001), Business and Society: Developing corporate social responsibility in the UK, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry (2004), Corporate Social Responsibility: A Government update, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W.E.B. (1896), The Suppression of the African Slave Trade to the USA 1638–1870, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997), Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Capstone, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union, (2004), Euroabstract: Corporate social responsibility, Vol. 42–1, February. European Commission: Directorate-General for Enterprise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970), The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, The New York Times Magazine, September 13: 33, 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Kouhy, R., and Levers, S. (1995), Corporate Social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 47–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Owen, D., and Adams, C. (1996), Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social Environmental Reporting, Prentice Hall, Englewood, Cliffs, NI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. and Parker, L. (1990), Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, Vol. 3, pp. 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. (2001), Misguided Virtue – False notion of corporate social responsibility, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idowu, S.O. and Towler, B.A. (2004), A comparative study of the contents of corporate social responsibility reports of UK companies, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 420–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idowu, S.O. (2008), An empirical study of what institutions of higher education in the UK consider to be their corporate social responsibility, in Aravossis, K, Brebbia, C.A. and Gomez, N. (Eds.), Environmental Economics and Investment, pp. 263–273, WIT Press, Southampton.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Idowu, S.O. and Papasolomou, I. (2007), Are the corporate Social Responsibility matters based on good intentions or false pretences? An empirical study of the motivations behind the issuing of CSR reports by UK companies, Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 136–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. (2003), Serving Stakeholders, CA Magazine, Toronto, March, pp. 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.M. (1995), Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 404–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.M. (1999), The institutional determinants of social responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse, N.K., Rozuel, C., and Lee-Davies, L. (2005), Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach: a conceptual review, International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 277–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. and Lee, N. (2005), Corporate Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantos, G.P. (2001), The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 595–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignon, I. and Ralston, D. (2002), Corporate social responsibility in europe and the us: insights from businesses' self-presentations, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, J. (2004), Hardfields Ltd: its annual general meetings 1903–1939 and their relevance for contemporary corporate social reporting, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 415–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2001), Corporate responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. and Richardson, J.J. (1985), Unemployment in the UK: Politics and Policies, Gower, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. (2004), Government as a driver of corporate social responsibility, University of Nottingham, International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, Research paper Series No. 20 ISSN 1479–5124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, D.M. (1992), Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory, Accounting, Organisation and Society, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 471–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawley, J.A. and Behrendt, S.D. (2005), The Transatlantic Slave Trade – A History, revised edition, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. (1992), Environmental disclosures in corporate annual reports in Western Europe, in Owen, D. (ed.), Green Reporting: Accountancy and the Challenge of the nineties, pp. 139–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • SalterBaxter/Context (2004), Directions 4 — Trends in CSR Reporting 2003–2004 SalterBaxter/ Context: Lsondon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776), The Wealth of Nations, Book 1 Chap. II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogl, A.J. (2003), Does it pay to be good? Across the Board, January/February, pp. 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, H. and Smith, C. (2006), CSR at a Crossroads: Futures for CSR in the UK to 2015, International Institute for Environment and Development (iied), London ISBN 1 84369 628 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD (1999), Corporate social responsibility, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • http://www.marksandspencer.com/gp/node/n site visited on August 3, 2007

  • http://www.corporateregister.com/charts/FTSE.htm site visited 12 August 2007

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Idowu, S.O. (2009). The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. In: Idowu, S.O., Filho, W.L. (eds) Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68815-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics