Abstract
The driving of contrast microbubbles towards a boundary by means of primary radiation forces has been of interest for ultrasound-assisted drug delivery. Secondary radiation forces, resulting from oscillating microbubbles under ultrasound insonification, may cause the mutual attraction and subsequent coalescence of contrast microbubbles. This phenomenon has been less studied. Microbubbles with a negligible shell can be forced to translate towards each other at relatively low mechanical indices (MI). Thick-shelled microbubbles would require a higher MI to be moved. However, at high MI, microbubble disruption is expected. We investigated if thick-shelled contrast agent microbubbles can be forced to cluster at high-MI. The thick-shelled contrast agent M1639, inserted through a cellulose capillary, was subjected to 3 MHz, high-MI pulsed ultrasound from a commercial ultrasound machine, and synchronously captured through a high numerical aperture microscope. The agent showed the ultrasound-induced formation of bubble clusters, and the translation thereof towards the capillary boundary. Hence, forced translation and clustering of thick-shelled contrast microbubbles is feasible. The phase difference between the excursion of the oscillating bubble and the incident sound field was computed for free and encapsulated bubbles. There is a transition in phase difference for encapsulated bubbles, owing to the friction of the shell. Therefore, approach velocities of encapsulated bubbles may not be comparable to those of free gas bubbles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
P. A. Dayton, K. E. Morgan, A. L. Klibanov, G. Brandenburger, K. R. Nightingale, and K. W. Ferrara, IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr. 44, 1264, 1997.
M. Postema, A. van Wamel, C. T. Lancée, and N. de Jong, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30, 827, 2004.
M. J. Shortencarier, P. A. Dayton, S. H. Bloch, P. A. Schumann, T. O. Matsunaga, and K. W. Ferrara, IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr. 51, 822, 2004.
P. Tortoli, V. Michelassi, M. Corsi, D. Righi, and Y. Takeuchi, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 27, 1265, 2001.
H. Medwin, Ultrasonics 15, 7, 1977.
P. Di Marco, W. Grassi, and G. Memoli, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 42, 435, 2003.
F. R. Young, Cavitation. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, 1989.
M. Postema and G. Schmitz, Ultrason. Sonochem., in press, 2006.
N. de Jong, R. Cornet, and C. T. Lancée, Ultrasonics 32, 447, 1994.
M. Postema, M. Mleczko, and G. Schmitz, Proc. IEEE Ultrason. Symp., in press, 2006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Postema, M., Mleczko, M., Schmitz, G. (2007). Mutual Attraction of Oscillating Microbubbles. In: Buzug, T.M., Holz, D., Bongartz, J., Kohl-Bareis, M., Hartmann, U., Weber, S. (eds) Advances in Medical Engineering. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 114. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68764-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68764-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68763-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68764-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)