Abstract
How is it possible to extract new knowledge from something already published? The possibility arises, for example, when two articles considered together suggest information of scientific interest not apparent from either article alone. In that sense, the two articles are complementary, a relationship based on the scientific problems, findings, and arguments presented. Whether the information found is also new and can lead to a plausible, testable hypothesis requires further searching and analysis of the literature from which it emerged.
The purpose of this introduction is to outline goals, concepts, problems, and literature structures that offer one approach to understanding the potential and limitations of literature-based discovery (LBD) independently of specific computer techniques that may be used to assist or implement it. The seeds of most of the basic concepts of LBD can be seen within the following classic exemplar of complementarity from a century ago that was of extraordinary importance to science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
H.P. Barrow. Impossibilities, The Limits of Science and the Science of Limits. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998
D. Blair. Wittgenstein, Language and Information: Back to the Rough Ground. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2006. [Part III]
A.R. Gardner-Medwin. Possible roles of vertebrate neuroglia in potassium dynamics, spreading depression, and migraine. Journal of Experimental Biology, 95:111–127, 1981
H.P. Lovecraft. The Call of Cthulhu. In S.T. Joshi, editor. The Call of Cthulhu and Other Weird Stories. Penguin Books Ltd., London, 1999
W.S. Sutton. The chromosomes in heredity. In J.A. Peters, editor, Classic Papers in Genetics, pp. 27–41. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1959
D.R. Swanson. Undiscovered public knowledge. Library Quarterly, 56:103–118, 1986
D.R. Swanson. Migraine and magnesium: eleven neglected connections. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 31(4):526–557, 1988
D.R. Swanson. Complementary structures in disjoint science literatures. In A. Bookstein, Y. Chiaramella, G. Salton, and V.V. Raghavan, editors, Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Conference of Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’91), pp. 280–289. ACM, New York, 1991
D.R. Swanson. Atrial fibrillation in athletes: implicit literature-based connections suggest that overtraining and subsequent inflammation may be a contributory mechanism. Medical Hypotheses, 66:1085–1092, 2006
J.M. Ziman. Public Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1968
J.M. Ziman. Information, communication, knowledge. Nature, 224:318–324, 1969
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Swanson, D.R. (2008). Literature-Based Discovery? The Very Idea. In: Bruza, P., Weeber, M. (eds) Literature-based Discovery. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol 15. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68690-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68690-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68685-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68690-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)