Abstract
Since the late 1980s, helical computed tomography (CT) has revolutionized diagnostic imaging of the chest. Single-detector CT scanners (SDCT) and, more recently, multi-detector CT scanners (MDCT) have markedly increased the number of indications of CT. As a result, the number of CT examinations performed has increased dramatically, as have the average scanned volume per patient and the number of acquisitions per examination. The subsequent increase in collective radiation dose has been of concern to radiologists, medical physicists and governmental regulatory authorities and it has been suggested that the radiation dose used for CT was excessive (Rogers 2001a, b).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bae KT, Slone RM, Gierada DS, Yusen RD, Cooper JD (1997) Patients with emphysema: quantitative CT analysis before and after lung volume reduction surgery. Radiology 203:705–714
Bankier AA, Schaefer-Prokop C, De Maertelaer V, Tack D, Jaksch P, Klepetko W, Gevenois PA (2006) Air trapping on thin-section CT examinations: comparison of standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques. Radiology (in press)
Dinkel HP, Sonnenschein M, Hoppe H, Vock P (2003) Lowdose multislice CT of the thorax in follow-up of malignant lymphoma and extrapulmonary primary tumors. Eur Radiol 13:1241–1249
Dirksen A, Dijkman JH, Madsen F et al (1999) A randomized clinical trial of α1-antitrypsin augmented therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160:1468–1472
Gierada DS, Yusen RD, Pilgram TK et al (2001) Repeatability of quantitative CT indexes of emphysema in patients evaluated for lung volume reduction surgery. Radiology 220:448–454
Golding SJ, Shrimpton PC (2002) Radiation dose in CT: are we meeting the challenge? (Commentary). Br J Radiol 75:1–4
Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF et al (1999) Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 354:99–105
Itoh H, Ikeda M, Arahata S et al (2000) Lung cancer screening: minimum tube current required for helical CT. Radiology 215:175–183
Lee KS, Primack SL, Staples CA, Mayo JR, Aldrich JE, Müller NL (1994) Chronic infiltrative lung disease: comparison of diagnostic accuracies of radiography and low-and conventional-dose thin-section CT. Radiology 191:669–673
Madani A, De Maertelaer V, Zanen J, Gevenois PA (2006) Pulmonary emphysema: impact of radiation dose and section thickness on objective quantification at multidetector row CT — comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry. Radiology (in press)
Mayo JR, Webb WR, Gould R et al (1987) High-resolution CT of the lungs: an optimal approach. Radiology 163:507–510
Mayo JR, Whittall KP, Leung AN et al (1997) Simulated dose reduction in conventional chest CT: validation study. Radiology 202:453–457
Naidich DP, Marshall CH, Gribbin C, Arams RS, McCauley DI (1990) Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations. Radiology 175:729–731
Newell JD, Hogg JC, Snider GL (2004) Report of a workshop: quantitative computed tomography scanning in longitudinal studies of emphysema. Eur Respir J 23:769–775
Rennard S, Decramer M, Calverley PM, Pride NB, Soriano JB, Vermeire PA, Vestbo J (2002) Impact of COPD in North America and Europe in 2000: subjects’ perspective of Confronting COPD International Survey. Eur Respir J 20:799–805
Rogers LF (2001a) Radiation exposure in CT: why so high? AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:277
Rogers LF (2001b) Serious business: radiation safety and radiation protection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1
Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA et al (2003) Data from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK — 2003 review. NRPB — 67, National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton
Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, Chen X, Paul JF (2004) Low-kilovoltage multidetector row chest CT in adults: feasability and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology 231:169–174
Snider GL, Kleinerman JL, Thurlbeck WM et al (1985) The definition of emphysema. Report of a national Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Division of Lung Disease Workshop. Am Rev Respir Dis 132:182–185
Studler U, Gluecker T, Bongartz G et al (2005) Image quality from high-resolution CT of the lung: comparison of axial scans and of sections reconstructed from volumetric data acquired using MDCT. AJR 185:602–607
Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Sloan JA et al (2002) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:508–513
Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Petit W, Scillia P, Muller P, Suess C, Gevenois PA (2005) Comparisons of standard-dose and simulated low-dose multi-detector-row CT pulmonary angiography. Radiology 236:318–325
UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation Report to the General Assembly. United Nations, New York
Zwirewich CV, Mayo JR, Müller NL (1991) Low-dose highresolution CT of lung parenchyma. Radiology 180:413–417
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gevenois, P.A., Tack, D. (2007). Dose Reduction and Optimization in Computed Tomography of the Chest. In: Tack, D., Gevenois, P.A. (eds) Radiation Dose from Adult and Pediatric Multidetector Computed Tomography. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68575-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68575-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28888-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68575-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)