Abstract
In conventional GIS, road links are represented by a centerline-based modelling schema which raises many difficulties in lane-specific transport applications, such as navigation, simulation, and visualization. To meet such lane-specific requirements, road network data model has evolved from centerline-based model, to carriageway-based model, and furthermore, to lane-based model. Varying in representation scale, each schema has its advantages and disadvantages, and no consensus has been reached on which one is more proper or efficient. The evaluation and selection of data model should be closely related to the application purposes and requirements. This paper examines the modelling strategies of the three schemas in the context of vehicle navigation. Based on navigation characterists, this paper further puts forward a GIS road network model which is not based on road object scale, but the driving direction that each road link provides. Compared with the other three modelling schema, this schema is more effective on topology maintenance, multi-cartographic representation, and data compaction.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Curtin, K., Noronha, V., Goodchild, M. & Grise, S. (2003). “ArcGIS Transportation Data Model (UNETRANS)”. http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/$∼ $curtin/unetrans/ UNETRANS_index.htm. Accessed 2007 19 July.
Demirel, H. (2004). “A dynamic multi-dimensinal conceptual data model for transportation applications”. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 301-314.
Dueker, K. J. & Bender, P. (2003). “Building and Maintaining a Statewide Transportation Framework”. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1836, 93-101.
FGDC (2001). NSDI Framework Transportation Identification Standard, Ground Transportation Subcommittee.
Fohl, P., Curtin, K. M., Goodchild, M. F. & Church, M. F. (1997). “A Non-planar, Lane-based Navigable Data Model for ITS”. 7th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. Delft, Netherlands London: Taylor & Francis.
Kiwi-W Consortium (2001). Kiwi Format Ver1.22. http://www.kiwi-w.org/documents_eng.html. Accessed 2007 19 July.
Koncz, N. A. & Adams, T. M. (2002). “A data model for multi-dimensional transportation applications”. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16(6), 551-569.
Malaikrisanachalee, S. & Adams, T. M. (2005). “Lane-based Network for Transportation Network Flow Analysis and Inventory”. TRB 2005 Annual Meeting CD-ROM.
TC 204 (2004). ISO 14825:2004 Intelligent transport systems - Geographic Data Files (GDF) - Overall data specification.
TransXML (2005). NCHRO 20-64 XML Schemas for the Exchange of Transportation Data. http://www.transxml.org/. Accessed 2007 19 July.
Vonderohe, A. P., Chou, C. L., Sun, F. & Adams, T. M. (1997). A Generic Data Model for Linear Referencing Systems. Research Results Digest (National Cooperative Highway Research Program), 218.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yue, Y., Yeh, A.GO., Li, Q. (2008). Road Network Model for Vehicle Navigation using Traffic Direction Approach. In: Ruas, A., Gold, C. (eds) Headway in Spatial Data Handling. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68566-1_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68566-1_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68565-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68566-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)