Advertisement

A Qualitative Study of Culture and Persuasion in a Smoking Cessation Game

  • Rilla Khaled
  • Ronald Fischer
  • James Noble
  • Robert Biddle
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5033)

Abstract

To explore the issue of culture in persuasive technology, we identified strategies distinguishing individualist or collectivist audiences, and developed two versions of a prototype game. In this paper we report on a qualitative study of this game. The game concerned smoking cessation, and was set in a New Zealand context, where one version was designed for individualist New Zealand Europeans, and the other for collectivist New Zealand Māori. Our qualitative study involved people from each group playing each of the two games. Using a “think-aloud” protocol, we recorded player comments and reflections that show the effect of our design on their behaviour. The results of the study show the designs were interpreted differently according to the audiences playing them, and reveal detail about culture and persuasion.

Keywords

Smoking Cessation Collectivist Culture Group Opinion Persuasive Technology Ingroup Member 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Triandis, H.C.: Culture and Social Behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hofstede, G.: Cultures and organisations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khaled, R., Noble, J., Biddle, R.: Developing culturally-aware persuasive technology. In: Gado, E.D. (ed.) Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Internationalisation of Products and Systems (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khaled, R., Barr, P., Noble, J., Fischer, R., Biddle, R.: Our place or mine? Exploration into collectivism-focused persuasive technology design. In: IJsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 72–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khaled, R., Barr, P., Fischer, R., Biddle, R., Noble, J.: Factoring culture into the design of a persuasive game. In: Proceedings of OzCHI 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khaled, R., Biddle, R., Noble, J., Barr, P., Fischer, R.: Persuasive interaction for collectivist cultures. In: Piekarski, W. (ed.) Australasian User Interface Conference (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khaled, R., Barr, P., Noble, J., Biddle, R., Fischer, R.: Fine tuning the persuasion in persuasive games. In: de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Creswell, J.W.: Research Design: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Sage Publications, CA (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Creswell, J.W.: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Amongst Five Traditions. Sage Publications, CA (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Triandis, H.C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M.J., Asai, M., Lucca, N.: Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(2), 323–338 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Markus, H., Kitayama, S.: Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 98, 224–253 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Triandis, H.C.: Individualism and Collectivism (New Directions in Social Psychology). Westview Press (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gudykunst, W.B., Matsumoto, Y.: Cross-cultural variability of communication in personal relationships. In: Gudykunst, W.B., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T. (eds.) Communication in Personal Relationships Across Cultures. Sage, CA, USA (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall, E.: Beyond Culture. Anchor Press/Doubleday (1976)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vatrapu, R., Perez-Quinones, M.A.: Culture and international usability testing: The effects of culture in structured interviews. Journal of Usability Studies 1(4), 156–170 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Mooij, M.: Global Marketing and Advertising: Understanding Cultural Paradoxes. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gao, G.: Self and OTHER: A Chinese perspective on interpersonal relationships. In: Gudykunst, W.B., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T. (eds.) Communication in Personal Relationships Across Cultures. Sage, CA, USA (1996)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zandpour, F., Sadri, G.: Communication in personal relationships in Iran: A comparative analysis. In: Gudykunst, W.B., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T. (eds.) Communication in Personal Relationships Across Cultures. Sage, CA, USA (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aaker, J., Brumbaugh, A.M., Grier, S.M.: Nontarget markets and viewer distinctiveness: The impact of target marketing on advertising attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research 9(3), 127–140 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rilla Khaled
    • 1
  • Ronald Fischer
    • 1
  • James Noble
    • 1
  • Robert Biddle
    • 2
  1. 1.Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations