The Persuasive Power of Human-Machine Dialogue
The persuasive power of live interaction is hard to match, yet technologies are increasingly taking on roles to promote behavioral change. We believe that speech-based interfaces offer a compelling mode of interaction for engaging users and are motivated to understand how to best present persuasive information using speech interaction. We present a study comparing the persuasive power of two speech-based information systems, one which uses a recorded message-based lecture presentation and another which uses an interactive dialogic presentation. We measure the persuasive power across both conditions using a survival task. We find that the dialogic system is significantly more persuasive than the lecture system. We also find that the dialogic system presents significantly (almost four times) less information than the lecture system. We analyze our results using three standard rank correlation methods. We point to limitations of these measures and propose a new metric which appears to be more sensitive for this task.
KeywordsSpeech Recognition System Persuasive Technology Persuasive Message Dialogic System Rank Correlation Method
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Davis, S.: Internet-based tailored health communications: history and theoretical foundations. Interface: The Journal of Education, Community and Values 7(3) (2007)Google Scholar
- 9.Kraft, P., Schjelderup-Lund, H., Brendryen, H.: Digital Therapy: The coming together of psychology and technology can create a new generation of programs for more sustainable behavioral change. In: de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 18–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Nass, C., Brave, S.: Wired for Speech. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
- 11.Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E.R.: Computers are social actors. In: Proceedings of CHI 1994. ACM Press, New York (1994)Google Scholar
- 12.Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Springer, New York (1986)Google Scholar
- 13.Petty, R.E., Wegener, D.T.: The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current status and Controversies. In: Chaiken, S., Trope, Y. (eds.) Dual process theories in social psychology, New York (1999)Google Scholar
- 14.Werkhoven, P., Schraagen, J.M., Punte, P.A.J.: Seeing is believing: communication performance under isotropic teleconferencing conditions. Displays 22 (2001)Google Scholar