Advertisement

Six Patterns for Persuasion in Online Social Networks

  • G. Michael Weiksner
  • B. J. Fogg
  • Xingxin Liu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5033)

Abstract

Social psychology research has shown that persuasion happens in predictable ways. To identify patterns of persuasion in online social networks, we studied Facebook as a persuasive technology. Using a Grounded Theory approach, we found and named six persuasion patterns. Four patterns that led to large-scale viral adoption—Provoke and Retaliate, Reveal and Compare, Expression, and Group Exchange—are native to Facebook. Two patterns—Competition and Deception—are adapted to Facebook. We describe these native and adapted patterns and offer psychological explanations for each. We conclude that persuasion in online social networks follows regular, observable patterns, and we suggest promising avenues for future research.

Keywords

Online Social Networks Facebook Persuasion Social Psychology Applications Patterns Persuasive Technology Viral Growth Captology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Freedman, J., Fraser, S.: Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4, 195–202 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hall, G.S., Motora, Y.: Dermal sensitiveness to gradual pressure changes. American Journal of Psychology 1(1), 72–98 (1887); For a more recent review, please see Goldstein. L. How to boil a live frog. Analysis 60(266), 170–178 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine De Gruyter, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Mann, C., Stewart, F.: Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Staw, B.M.: The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review 6(4), 577–587 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fogg, B.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gouldner, A.W.: The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociology Review 25, 161–178 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dengerink, H.A., Schnedler, R.W., Covey, M.K.: Role of avoidance in aggressive responses to attack and no attack. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, 1044–1053 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Festinger, L.: A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University, Stanford, CA (1957)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grey, A.: Individuality, conformity and collective identity. International Forum of Psychoanalysis 2(1), 9–12 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zucchermaglio, C., Talamo, A.: Identita sociale e piccolo gruppo [Social identity in the small group]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 27(3), 57–86 (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones, E.E.: Ingratiation: A social psychological analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York (1964)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fazio, R.H., Zanna, M.P., Cooper, J.: Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency: An information processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4, 48–52 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bar-Tal, D., Bar-Zohar, Y., Greenberg, M.S., Hermon, M.: Reciprocity behavior in the relationship between donor and recipient and between harm-doer and victim. Sociometry 40(1997), 293–298 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117(1995), 497–529 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scheidlinger, S.: Identification, the sense of belonging and of identity in small groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 14(3), 291–306 (1964)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baumeister, R.F., Tice, D.M.: Anxiety and social exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 9, 165–195 (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goffman, E.: The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leary, M.R., Kowalski, R.M.: Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin 107(11), 34–47 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cialdini, R.B., Levy, A., Herman, C.P., Kozlowski, L.T., Petty, R.E.: Elastic shifts of opinion: Determinants of direction and durability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24, 633–672 (1976)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lieppe, M.R., Elkin, R.A.: When motives clash: Issue involvement and response involvement as determinants of persuasion. Journal of Personality and Psychology 52, 269–278 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tetlock, P.E.: Accountability and the complexity on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25, 331–376 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lepper, M.R., Greene, D. (eds.): The hidden costs of reward. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1978)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Malone, T.W.: Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science 4, 333–369 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cohen, A.R.: Need for cognition and order of communication as a determinant of opinion change. In: Hovland, C.I. (ed.) Order of presentation in persuasion, pp. 79–97. Yale University Press, New Haven (1957)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Feinstein, J., Jarvis, B.: Individual differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of people varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin 119, 197–253 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stone, A.R.: The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nin, N.: Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology 25, 467–487 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    DePaulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., Cooper, H.: Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin 129(1), 74–118 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Trovillo, P.V.: A history of lie detection. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 29, 848–881 (1939)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Darley, J.M., Latane, B.: Norms and normative behavior: Field studies of social interdependence. In: Macaulay, J., Berkowitz, l. (eds.) Altruism and helping behavior, pp. 83–101. Academic Press, New York (1970)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Festinger, L.: A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7, 117–140 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bickman, L.: The social power of a uniform. Journal of Applied Social Pscyhology 4, 47–61 (1974)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hofling, C.K., Brotzman, E., Dalrymple, S., Graves, N., Pierce, C.M.: An experimental study of nurse-physician relationship. Journal of Nevous and Mental Disease 143, 171–180 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Michael Weiksner
    • 1
  • B. J. Fogg
    • 1
  • Xingxin Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford UniversityStanford

Personalised recommendations