Skip to main content

Empirical Analysis of the Architecture of the Interbank Market and Credit Market Using Network Theory

  • Chapter
Networks, Topology and Dynamics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 613))

Abstract The credit relationships in an economic system are essentially three: the interbank market, the lending market between banks and firms, the commercial credit among firms. Here the focus is on the first two kinds of credit, using network tools. The graph theory, which is at the basis of network analysis, is used as the natural mathematical environment to investigate the architecture (topology) of these markets. The interbank market is represented as a network where the nodes are banks and the links are the reciprocal exposures. The lending relationships between banks and firms is represented by a bipartite graph where the nodes are of two kinds: banks and firms. From the bipartite graph, the network of cofinancing banks is extracted. We observe the leading role of large Italian banks which form a strong core in the network both in the interbank and in the lending market. The small banks act as lenders and the large as borrowers in the interbank market. Both of them finance firms on the lending market, the large ones financing the most of the large firms, while the small ones the small local firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dorogovtsev SN, Mendes JFF (2003) Evolution of networks from biological nets to the internet and the WWW. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caldarelli G (2006) Scale-free networks. Complex webs in nature and technology. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caldarelli G Kirman A (1999) Beyond the representative agent. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  4. Serrano MA, Boguñá M (2003) Topology of the world trade web. Phys Rev E 68:015101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garlaschelli D, Loffredo MI (2004) Fitness-dependent topological properties of the world trade web. Phys Rev Lett 93:188701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Masi G, Iori G, Caldarelli G, (2006) A fitness model of the Italian interbank market. Phys Rev E 74:066112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Iori G, De Masi G, Precup O, Gabbi G and Caldarelli G (2007) A network analysis of the Italian overnight money market. J Econ Dynam and Control 32(1):259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garlaschelli D, Battiston S, Castri M, Servedio VDP, Caldarelli G (2005) Th scale free topology of market investments. Physica A 350:491–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reichardt J, Bornholdt S (2005) eBay users form stable groups of common interest. arXiv:physics/0503138

    Google Scholar 

  10. Souma W, Fujiwara Y, Aoyama H (2003) Complex networks and economics. Physica A 324(1–2):396–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Delli Gatti D, Gallegati M, Greenwald B, Russo A, Stiglitz JE (2006) Business fluctuations in a credit-network economy. Physica A 370:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartmann P, Manna M, Manzanares A (2001) The microstructure of the euro money market. J Int Money Finance 20:895–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barucci E, Impenna C, Reno R (2004) Res Banking Finance 4:321–362

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boss M, Elsinger H, Summer M et al. (2004) Network topology of the interbank market. Quantitative Finance 4:677–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ogawa K, Sterken E, Tokutsu I (2007) Why do Japanese firms prefer multiple bank relationship? Some evidence from firm-level data. Econ Syst 31:49–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ongena S, Smith DC (2000) What determines the number of bank relationships? Crosscountry evidence. J Financial Intermediation 9(1):26–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Detragiache E, Garella P, Guiso L (2000) Multiple vs single banking relationships: theory and evidence. J Finance LV(3)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peltomaki M, Alava M (2006) Correlations in bipartite collaboration networks. J Stat Mech P01010

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sneppen K, Rosvall M, Trusina A (2004) A simple model for self organization of bipartite networks. Europhys Lett 67(3):349–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guillaume JL, Latapy M (2004) Bipartite structure of all complex networks. Inf Process Lett 90(5)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lind PG, Hermann HJ (2007) New approaches to model and study social networks. arXiv:physics/0701107

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stanca L, Arosio S, Bonanno V, Cavalieri C (2005) La struttura finanziaria in Italia: evoluzione del rapporto banche e imprese. Politica Economica

    Google Scholar 

  23. Forestieri G, Tirri V (2002) Rapporto banca-impresa. Struttura del mercato e politiche del prezzo, Ente Luigi Einaudi. Quaderni di Ricerche 31

    Google Scholar 

  24. www.bvdep.com

  25. Annual report on vigilance activites of Bank of Italy, May 2005

    Google Scholar 

  26. The Italian Institute for Statistics provides a classification of Italian firms in micro-firms, small-size, medium-size and large. The classification depends on the numeber of workers: (1) less than 10 workers, micro; (2) between 10 and 50 small; (3) between 50 and 250 medium; (4) more than 250 large

    Google Scholar 

  27. Salza E (2004) Il sistema produttivo e il rapporto banca-impresa. Impresa e Stato 67

    Google Scholar 

  28. De Masi G, Gallegati M (2007) Debt-credit economic networks of banks and firms: the Italian case. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York. ISBN: 978-88-470-0664-5

    Google Scholar 

  29. De Masi G, Gallegati M (2007) The Bank-Firm topology in Italy (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pastor-Satorras R, and Vespignani A (2001) Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Phys Rev Lett 86:3200–3203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Strogatz SH (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature 410:268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Newman MEJ (2001) Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Phys Rev E 64(1):026118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Colizza V, Flammini A, Serrano MA, Vespignani A (2006) Nat Phys 2:110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mantegna RN (1999) Hierarchical structure in financial markets. Eur Phys J B 11:193–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulia De Masi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Masi, G. (2009). Empirical Analysis of the Architecture of the Interbank Market and Credit Market Using Network Theory. In: Naimzada, A.K., Stefani, S., Torriero, A. (eds) Networks, Topology and Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 613. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68409-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics