Skip to main content

Conclusion: Lessons for Theory and Practice

  • Chapter
Diplomacy Games

Abstract

The focus of this chapter is on the usefulness of formal models to the practice of international negotiations—quite in the spirit of the mission of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)—and also to the theory of international negotiations itself, and less on lessons for the formal theory, even though many ideas about what should be done in the theory itself can be found in previous chapters.3 These conclusions deal with lessons for practitioners of international negotiations such as businesspeople, diplomats, and politicians, as well as providing lessons for modelers who want or have to develop formal models for the purpose of analyzing past negotiations in a descriptive way or, more challenging, for providing formal aid to actual negotiation.

Discussion of theoretical improvements is left to the many publications that describe trends and necessities of theoretical negotiation research (e.g., [16]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avenhaus R (2001) Game theory and the negotiation process. PINPoints Newsletter 16:4–5, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avenhaus R, Beetz J, Kilgour DM (2005) Quantitative models for armament escalation and negotiations. In: Zartman IW, Faure GO (eds) Escalation and negotiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  3. Axelrod R (1984) The Evolution of cooperation. BasicBooks, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brams S, Doherty A, Weidner M (1994) Game theory: focusing on the players, decisions and agreements. In: Zartman IW (ed) International multilateral negotiation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bueno de Mesquita B (2002) Predicting politics. The Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edgeworth FY (1881/1967) Mathematical physics. Kegan, Paul, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faure GO (ed 2003) How people negotiate. Resolving disputes in different cultures. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fearon J (1994) Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review LXXXVIII 3:577–92 (September)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fearon J (1997) Signaling foreign policy interests: tying hands versus sinking costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution XXXI:68–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hicks J (1932) The theory of wages, Macmillan, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kydd A (2000) Trust, reassurance and cooperation. International Organization, LIV 3:325–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kydd A (2001) Trust building, trust breaking: the dilemma of NATO enlargement. International Organization 55:808–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kydd J, Walter B (2002) Sabotaging the peace: the politics of extremist violence. International Organization LVI 2:263–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lax D, Sebenius J (1986) The manager as negotiator, Free Press, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morrow JD (1994) Game theory for political scientists. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Muthoo A (1999) Bargaining theory with applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nash J (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155–122. Reprinted in: Young O (ed) (1975) Bargaining. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, USA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nash J (1953) Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica XXI 1:28–40. Reprinted in: Young O (ed) (1975) Bargaining. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  19. O’Neill B (1999) Honor symbols and war. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Putnam R (1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization XXXXII 3:427–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Raiffa H, Richardson J, Metcalfe D (2002) Negotiation analysis: the science and art of collaborative decision-making. Harvard Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reiter E, Selten R (eds) 2003, Zur Lösung des Kosovo-Konfliktes. Die Anwendung der Szenario-Bündelanalyse im Konfliktmanagement. Nomos, Baden Baden, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  23. Selten R (1999) Game theory and economic behavior. Vol I. 291–325, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  24. Simmons BA (1999) Territorial disputes and their resolution. United States Institute of Peace (USIP) Press, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simmons BA (2005) The Peru-Ecuador border dispute. In: Zartman IW, Kremenyuk V (eds) Peace vs. justice: negotiating forward-vs. backward-looking outcomes. Rowman and Littlefield, Bolder, CO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spector BI, Zartman IW (eds 2004) Getting it done: post-agreement negotiation and international regimes. United States Institute for Peace (USIP) Press, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zartman IW (1996) Negotiation as a search for justice. International Negotiation I 1:79–98

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zartman IW, Faure GO (eds) (2005) Escalation and international negotiation. Cambridge University Press, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zeuthen F (1930) Problems of monopoly and economic warfare. Routledge and Sons, London, UK. Excerpts in: Young O (ed) Bargaining. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zartman, I.W., Avenhaus, R. (2007). Conclusion: Lessons for Theory and Practice. In: Avenhaus, R., Zartman, I.W. (eds) Diplomacy Games. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68304-9_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics