Abstract
The focus of this chapter is on the usefulness of formal models to the practice of international negotiations—quite in the spirit of the mission of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)—and also to the theory of international negotiations itself, and less on lessons for the formal theory, even though many ideas about what should be done in the theory itself can be found in previous chapters.3 These conclusions deal with lessons for practitioners of international negotiations such as businesspeople, diplomats, and politicians, as well as providing lessons for modelers who want or have to develop formal models for the purpose of analyzing past negotiations in a descriptive way or, more challenging, for providing formal aid to actual negotiation.
Discussion of theoretical improvements is left to the many publications that describe trends and necessities of theoretical negotiation research (e.g., [16]).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Avenhaus R (2001) Game theory and the negotiation process. PINPoints Newsletter 16:4–5, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
Avenhaus R, Beetz J, Kilgour DM (2005) Quantitative models for armament escalation and negotiations. In: Zartman IW, Faure GO (eds) Escalation and negotiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Axelrod R (1984) The Evolution of cooperation. BasicBooks, New York, USA
Brams S, Doherty A, Weidner M (1994) Game theory: focusing on the players, decisions and agreements. In: Zartman IW (ed) International multilateral negotiation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, USA
Bueno de Mesquita B (2002) Predicting politics. The Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH, USA
Edgeworth FY (1881/1967) Mathematical physics. Kegan, Paul, London, UK
Faure GO (ed 2003) How people negotiate. Resolving disputes in different cultures. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Fearon J (1994) Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review LXXXVIII 3:577–92 (September)
Fearon J (1997) Signaling foreign policy interests: tying hands versus sinking costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution XXXI:68–90
Hicks J (1932) The theory of wages, Macmillan, New York, USA
Kydd A (2000) Trust, reassurance and cooperation. International Organization, LIV 3:325–57
Kydd A (2001) Trust building, trust breaking: the dilemma of NATO enlargement. International Organization 55:808–28
Kydd J, Walter B (2002) Sabotaging the peace: the politics of extremist violence. International Organization LVI 2:263–96
Lax D, Sebenius J (1986) The manager as negotiator, Free Press, New York, USA
Morrow JD (1994) Game theory for political scientists. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA
Muthoo A (1999) Bargaining theory with applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Nash J (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155–122. Reprinted in: Young O (ed) (1975) Bargaining. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, USA
Nash J (1953) Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica XXI 1:28–40. Reprinted in: Young O (ed) (1975) Bargaining. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, USA
O’Neill B (1999) Honor symbols and war. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Putnam R (1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization XXXXII 3:427–60
Raiffa H, Richardson J, Metcalfe D (2002) Negotiation analysis: the science and art of collaborative decision-making. Harvard Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
Reiter E, Selten R (eds) 2003, Zur Lösung des Kosovo-Konfliktes. Die Anwendung der Szenario-Bündelanalyse im Konfliktmanagement. Nomos, Baden Baden, Germany
Selten R (1999) Game theory and economic behavior. Vol I. 291–325, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
Simmons BA (1999) Territorial disputes and their resolution. United States Institute of Peace (USIP) Press, Washington DC, USA
Simmons BA (2005) The Peru-Ecuador border dispute. In: Zartman IW, Kremenyuk V (eds) Peace vs. justice: negotiating forward-vs. backward-looking outcomes. Rowman and Littlefield, Bolder, CO, USA
Spector BI, Zartman IW (eds 2004) Getting it done: post-agreement negotiation and international regimes. United States Institute for Peace (USIP) Press, Washington DC, USA
Zartman IW (1996) Negotiation as a search for justice. International Negotiation I 1:79–98
Zartman IW, Faure GO (eds) (2005) Escalation and international negotiation. Cambridge University Press, London, UK
Zeuthen F (1930) Problems of monopoly and economic warfare. Routledge and Sons, London, UK. Excerpts in: Young O (ed) Bargaining. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, USA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zartman, I.W., Avenhaus, R. (2007). Conclusion: Lessons for Theory and Practice. In: Avenhaus, R., Zartman, I.W. (eds) Diplomacy Games. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68304-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68304-9_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68303-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68304-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)