Skip to main content

“Adjusted Winner” (AW) Analyses of the 1978 Camp David Accords—Valuable Tools for Negotiators?

  • Chapter
Diplomacy Games

Abstract

More than half a century after the birth of game theory as an academic (sub)discipline, many experienced negotiators and mediators continue to work without any formal support from game theory or related subjects. In the last decades, hopes have risen that mathematical procedures for the fair division of goods might be able to bridge this gulf. “Adjusted Winner” (AW), a procedure suggested by Brams and Taylor [2], promises to satisfy several standards of fairness simultaneously and, for this reason will be scrutinized here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aristotle (1984) Nicomachean ethics. In: The complete works of Aristotle, Vol. II, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brams S, Taylor A (1996) Fair division. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brams S, Taylor A (1999) The Win-win-solution: guaranteeing fair shares to everybody. W.W. Norton, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brams S, Togman J (1998) Camp David — Was the agreement fair? In: Harvey F, Mor B (eds) Conflict in world politics. Macmillan, Houndsmills, 306–323

    Google Scholar 

  5. Massoud TG (2000) Fair division, adjusted winner procedure (AW), and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44:333–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mastenbroek W (1991) Development of negotiating skills. In: Kremenyuk V (ed) International negotiation. San Francisco, CA, USA, 379–399

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meerts P (1997) Negotiating in the European Union, Group Decision and Negotiation 6:463–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Quandt W (1986) Camp David. Brookings Institute Press, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quandt W (2001) Peace process. Brookings Institute Press, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Raith M (1999) The Structure of fair-division and the design of fair-negotiation procedures. In: Patrone I, Garcia-Jurado I, Tijs T (eds) Game practice contributions from applied game theory. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Chapter 14

    Google Scholar 

  11. Raith M (2000) Fair-negotiation procedures. Mathematical Social Sciences 39:303–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Touval S, Zartman W (1985) Introduction — mediation in theory. In: Touval S, Zartman IW (eds) International mediation in theory and practice. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, USA, 7–17

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schüssler, R. (2007). “Adjusted Winner” (AW) Analyses of the 1978 Camp David Accords—Valuable Tools for Negotiators?. In: Avenhaus, R., Zartman, I.W. (eds) Diplomacy Games. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68304-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics