Skip to main content

Precise Interval Analysis vs. Parity Games

  • Conference paper
FM 2008: Formal Methods (FM 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5014))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In [8], a practical algorithm for precise interval analysis is provided for which, however, no non-trivial upper complexity bound is known. Here, we present a lower bound by showing that precise interval analysis is at least as hard as computing the sets of winning positions in parity games. Our lower-bound proof relies on an encoding of parity games into systems of particular integer equations. Moreover, we present a simplification of the algorithm for integer systems from [8]. For the given encoding of parity games, the new algorithm provides another algorithm for parity games which is almost as efficient as the discrete strategy improvement algorithm by Vöge and Jurdziński [17].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bordeaux, L., Hamadi, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: An Analysis of Slow Convergence in Interval Propagation. In: Bessière, C. (ed.) CP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4741, pp. 790–797. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Costan, A., Gaubert, S., Goubault, E., Martel, M., Putot, S.: A Policy Iteration Algorithm for Computing Fixed Points in Static Analysis of Programs. In: Etessami, K., Rajamani, S.K. (eds.) CAV 2005. LNCS, vol. 3576, pp. 462–475. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Static Determination of Dynamic Properties of Programs. In: Second Int. Symp. on Programming, pp. 106–130. Dunod, Paris, France (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Abstract Interpretation: A Unified Lattice Model for Static Analysis of Programs by Construction or Approximation of Fixpoints. In: Proceedings of 4th ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 238–252. ACM Press, New York (1977)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Systematic Design of Program Analysis Frameworks. In: 6th ACM Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL), pp. 238–352 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Emerson, E.A., Jutla, C.S.: Tree automata, mu-calculus and determinacy (extended abstract). In: FOCS, pp. 368–377. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gawlitza, T., Reineke, J., Seidl, H., Wilhelm, R.: Polynomial Exact Interval Analysis Revisited. Technical report, TU München (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gawlitza, T., Seidl, H.: Precise Fixpoint Computation Through Strategy Iteration. In: De Nicola, R. (ed.) ESOP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4421, pp. 300–315. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Gawlitza, T., Seidl, H.: Precise Relational Invariants Through Strategy Iteration. In: Duparc, J., Henzinger, T.A. (eds.) CSL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4646, pp. 23–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Jurdziński, M.: Deciding the winner in parity games is in UP ∩ co-UP. Inf. Process. Lett. 68(3), 119–124 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jurdziński, M., Paterson, M., Zwick, U.: A Deterministic Subexponential Algorithm for Solving Parity Games. In: 17th ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 117–123 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karr, M.: Affine Relationships Among Variables of a Program. Acta Informatica 6, 133–151 (1976)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Leroux, J., Sutre, G.: Accelerated Data-Flow Analysis. In: Riis Nielson, H., Filé, G. (eds.) SAS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4634, pp. 184–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Puri, A.: Theory of Hybrid and Discrete Systems. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Su, Z., Wagner, D.: A class of polynomially solvable range constraints for interval analysis without widenings and narrowings. In: Jensen, K., Podelski, A. (eds.) TACAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 2988, pp. 280–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vöge, J.: Strategiesynthese für Paritätsspiele auf endlichen Graphen. PhD thesis, RWTH Aachen (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vöge, J., Jurdziński, M.: A Discrete Strategy Improvement Algorithm for Solving Parity Games. In: Emerson, E.A., Sistla, A.P. (eds.) CAV 2000. LNCS, vol. 1855, pp. 202–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jorge Cuellar Tom Maibaum Kaisa Sere

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gawlitza, T., Seidl, H. (2008). Precise Interval Analysis vs. Parity Games. In: Cuellar, J., Maibaum, T., Sere, K. (eds) FM 2008: Formal Methods. FM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5014. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68237-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68237-0_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68235-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68237-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics