This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cf. the case concerning Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276. (1970) (I.C.J., Reports 1971, p. 50).
Cf. the case concerning Certain Expenses of the United Nations (I.C.J., Reports 1962, p. 163).
Cf. the case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (I.C.J., Reports 1986, p. 100).
Cf. ibid., p. 102 et seq.
In the Advisory Opinion concerning the Western Sahara: “In view of Spain’s persistent objections to the questions formulated in resolution 3292 (XXIX), the fact that it abstained and did not vote against the resolution cannot be interpreted as implying its consent to the adjudication of those questions by the Court. Moreover, its participation in the Court’s proceedings cannot be understood as implying that it has consented to the adjudication of the questions posed in resolution 3292 (XXIX), for it has persistently maintained its objections throughout” (I.C.J., Reports 1975, p. 23).
Cf. the case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (I.C.J., Reports 1986, p. 99).
I.C.J., Reports 1996, pages 254–255.
Cf. the Advisory Opinion concerning Certain Expenses of the United Nations (I.C.J., Reports 1962, p. 156). Concerning this question cf. Sloan, B., “General Assembly Resolutions revisited (forty years later)”, B.Y.I.L., 1987, pages 39–150.
I.C.J., case concerning the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Reports 1996, pages 254–255.
I.C.J., Reports 1971, p. 53.
I.C.J., Reports 1949, p. 178.
I.C.J., Reports 1971, p. 54.
Thus, in the Haya de la Torre case, in which it is stated that the I.C.J. decision “entails a legal consequence, namely that of putting an end to an illegal situation:...” (I.C.J., Reports 1951, p. 82).
In this case, the presence of South Africa in Namibia (cf. I.C.J., Reports 1971, p. 54).
Ibid. In this case, the illegal presence of South Africa in Namibia which harms “a people which must look to the international community for assistance in its progress towards the goals for which the sacred trust was instituted” (ibid.).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2007). Institutional Norms of the United Nations. In: Sovereignty and Interpretation of International Norms. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68207-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68207-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68206-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68207-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)