Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
See for example N. Masrieh-Hazboun, “Refugee Resettlement in the Gaza Strip: Israeli Policy Revisited”, in: J. Ginat/ E. Perkins (eds), The Palestinian Refugees: Old Problems —New Solutions, 2001, 179 et seq., 179.
J. Crisp, Rebuilding a War-torn Society: A review of UNHCR’s Reintegration Programme for Mozambican Returnees, 1996; G. Kibreab, Ready and Willing but Still Waiting: Eritrean Refugees in Sudan and the Dilemmas of Return, 1996.
Exceptions to this generalisation include L. Zeager/ J. Bascom, “Strategic Behaviour in Refugee Repatriation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 40 (1996), 460 et seq.; S. Takahashi, “The UNHCR Handbook on Voluntary Repatriation: The Emphasis of Return over Protection”, International Journal of Refugee Law 9 (1997), 593 et seq.
S.M. Lipset, “Some Social Requisites for Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy”, The American Political Science Review 53 (1959), 69 et seq.; G. O’Donnell/P.C. Schmitter, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies, 1986; D.A. Rustow, “Transitions to Democracy: towards a Dynamic Model”, Comparative Politics 2 (1970), 337 et seq.
T. Landman, Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An Introduction, 2003, 2nd ed., 29; D. Collier, “New Perspectives on the Comparative Method”, in: D. Rustow/K. Erikson (eds), Comparative Political Dynamics: Global Research Perspectives, 1991, 7 et seq.
S. Riess, “Return is struggle, not resignation”: lessons from the repatriation of Guatemalan refugees from Mexico, New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 21, Geneva, UNHCR Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit, 2000, 13.
UNHCR, The State of the World’s Refugees: A Humanitarian Agenda, 1997, 95.
UNHCR, The State of the World’s Refugees: Fifty years of Humanitarian Action, 2000, 218.
S. Bagshaw, “Benchmarks or Deutschmarks? Determining the Criteria for the Repatriation of Refugees to Bosnia and Herzegovina”, International Journal of Refugee Law 9 (1997), 566 et seq.
UNHCR, see note 8, 231.
P. Prettitore, The Right to Housing and Property Restitution in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Case Study, Unpublished paper presented to the BADIL Expert Forum Seminar on the Role of International Law in Peacemaking and Crafting Durable Solutions for Refugees, University of Ghent, 5 May 2003.
Riess, see note 6, 9.
UNHCR, Operational Plan for Durable Solutions within the Framework of Annex 7 of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Related Regional Return and Repatriation Movements, 1996, cited in Bagshaw, note 9, 572.
Prettitore, see note 11, 14.
N. Stockton, Strategic Coordination in Afghanistan, Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, 2002; D. Turton/P. Marsden, Taking Refugees for a Ride? The Politics of refugee return to Afghanistan, Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, 2002.
S. Petrin, Refugee Return and State Reconstruction: a comparative analysis, New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 66, Geneva, UNHCR Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit, 2002, 14.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dumper, M. (2007). Comparative Perspectives on the Repatriation and Resettlement of Palestinian Refugees: the Cases of Guatemala, Bosnia and Afghanistan. In: Benvenisti, E., Gans, C., Hanafi, S. (eds) Israel and the Palestinian Refugees. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, vol 189. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68161-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68161-8_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68160-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68161-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)