Skip to main content

Intuitionistic vs. Classical Tautologies, Quantitative Comparison

  • Conference paper
Book cover Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4941))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider propositional formulas built on implication. The size of a formula is the number of occurrences of variables in it. We assume that two formulas which differ only in the naming of variables are identical. For every n εℕ, there is a finite number of different formulas of size n. For every n we consider the proportion between the number of intuitionistic tautologies of size n compared with the number of classical tautologies of size n. We prove that the limit of that fraction is 1 when n tends to infinity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chauvin, B., Flajolet, P., Gardy, D., Gittenberger, B.: And/Or trees revisited. Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 13(4-5), 475–497 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Flajolet, P., Sedgewick, R.: Analytic combinatorics: functional equations, rational and algebraic functions. In: INRIA, vol. 4103 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Flajolet, P., Sedgewick, R.: Analytic combinatorics. Book in preparation (2007), available at: http://algo.inria.fr/flajolet/Publications/books.html

  4. Gardy, D.: Random Boolean expressions. In: Colloquium on Computational Logic and Applications. Proceedings in DMTCS, Chambery (France), June 2005, pp. 1–36 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gardy, D., Woods, A.: And/or tree probabilities of Boolean function. Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, 139–146 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fournier, H., Gardy, D., Genitrini, A., Zaionc, M.: Classical and intuitionistic logic are asymptotically identical. In: Duparc, J., Henzinger, T.A. (eds.) CSL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4646, pp. 177–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kostrzycka, Z., Zaionc, M.: Statistics of intuitionistic versus classical logic. Studia Logica 76(3), 307–328 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Lefmann, H., Savický, P.: Some typical properties of large And/Or Boolean formulas. Random Structures and Algorithms 10, 337–351 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Matecki, G.: Asymptotic density for equivalence. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 140, 81–91 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Moser, L., Wyman, M.: An asymptotic formula for the Bell numbers, Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, XLIX (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moczurad, M., Tyszkiewicz, J., Zaionc, M.: Statistical properties of simple types. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 10(5), 575–594 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilf, H.: generating functionology, 3rd edn. A K Peters Publishers (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zaionc, M.: On the asymptotic density of tautologies in logic of implication and negation. Reports on Mathematical Logic 39, 67–87 (2005)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Zaionc, M.: Probability distribution for simple tautologies. Theoretical Computer Science 355(2), 243–260 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marino Miculan Ivan Scagnetto Furio Honsell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Genitrini, A., Kozik, J., Zaionc, M. (2008). Intuitionistic vs. Classical Tautologies, Quantitative Comparison. In: Miculan, M., Scagnetto, I., Honsell, F. (eds) Types for Proofs and Programs. TYPES 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4941. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68103-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68103-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68084-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68103-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics