Abstract
The events of 9/11 brought renewed focus to critical infrastructure, but the security of infrastructure has been and continues to be an issue outside the scope of any one event or country. Oil pipeline attacks in Iraq, massive blackouts in Italy, the United States, and Russia, submarine cable failures in the Atlantic, accidental and intentional failures of infrastructure are an increasing and complex problem. The issue of infrastructure security is a global problem both is applicability and connectivity. All nations are dependent on infrastructure and many of these infrastructures cross international borders and some span the globe. A problem facing all nations is that they have the responsibility for securing infrastructure but critical aspects are owned by the private sector. This though is only one of many problems facing infrastructure security: 1) infrastructures are interdependent on each others reliability 2) infrastructures are large, dynamically unsynchronized, and complex 3) sharing information about infrastructure vulnerabilities is severely hampered by fears of regulation and competition. Along with these direct obstacles there are larger economic forces that complicate the issue. The markets driving infrastructure are geared towards maximizing efficiency to increase profit and not maximizing protection, which can result in public vulnerabilities.
Keywords
- Geographic Information System
- Critical Infrastructure
- Physical Review Letter
- Spatial Network
- Complex Network Theory
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albert, R., H. Jeong and A.-L. Barabás.i 2000. Attack and error tolerance in complex networks. Nature, 406(6794), 378–382.
Bathelemy, M. 2003. Cross-over from scale-free to spatial networks. http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212086.
Borgatti, S.P., M.G. Everett and L.C. Freeman. 2003. Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard Analytic Technologies.
Callaway, D.S., M.E.J. Newman, S.H. Strogatz and D.J. Watts. 2000. Network robustness and fragility: percolation on random graphs. Physical Review Letters, 85(25), 5468–5471.
Chen, Q., C. Hyunseok, R. Govindan, J. Sugih, S. Schenker and W. Willinger. 2001. The origin of power laws in Internet topologies revisited. Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2002, 2, 608–617.
Cohen, R., K. Erez, D. ben-Avraham and S. Havlin. 2001. Breakdown of the Internet under intentional attack. Physical Review Letters, 86(16), 3682–3685.
Freeman, L.C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.
Garrison, W. 1960. Connectivity of the interstate highway system. Papers and proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 6, 121–137.
Goh, K.I., B. Kahng and D. Kim. 2001. Universal behavior or load distribution in scale-free networks. Physical Review Letters, 87(27), 278701-1–4.
Gorman, S.P. and E.J. Malecki. 2000. The networks of the Internet: an analysis of provider networks. Telecommunications Policy, 24(2), 113–134.
Gorman, S.P. and R. Kulkarni. 2004. Spatial small worlds: new geographic patterns for an information economy. Environment and Planning B, 31(2), 273–296.
Grubesic, T.H., M.E. O’Kelly and A.T. Murray. 2003. A geographic perspective on telecommunication network survivability. Telematics and Informatics, 20(1), 51–69.
Haggett, P. and R. Chorley. 1969. Network Analysis in Geography, New York, NY, USA: St. Martins Press.
Kansky, K. 1963. Structure of Transportation Networks: Relationships Between Network Geometry and Regional Characteristics, University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Research Papers.
Lakhina, A., Byers, J.W., Crovella, M. and I. Mattra. 2002. On the geographic locations of Internet resources. http://www.cs.bu.edu/techreports/pdf/2002-015-internet-geography.pdf.
Longcore, T. and P. Rees. 1996. Information Technology and Downtown Restructuring: The Case of New York City’s Financial District. Urban Geography 17, 354–372.
Malecki, E.J. 2002. The economic geography of the Internet’s infrastructure. Economic Geography, 78(4), 399–424.
Network Reliability and Interoperability Council (NRIC). 1997. Final Report of the Network Reliability and Interoperability Council. Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission.
Nyusten, J.D. and M.F. Dacey. 1968. A graph theory interpretation of nodal regions. In B. Berry and D. Marble, Spatial Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 407–418.
Obrien, C. 1992. Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography. Chatham House/Pinter, London.
O’Kelly, M.E. and T.H. Grubesic. 2002. Backbone topology, access, and the commercial Internet, 1997–2000. Environment and Planning B, 29(4), 533–552.
Office of Technology Assessment. 1995. The Technological Reshaping of Metropolitan America. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Power, D. 2002. IT and institutions in the structuring of European finance: Urban impacts. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 23(3), 335–356
Schintler, L.A., Gorman, S., Reggiani, A., Patuelli, R. and P. Nijkamp. 2005. Small-world phenomena in Communications networks: A cross-atlantic comparison. In A. Reggiani and L. A. Schintler, Methods and Models in Transport and Telecommunications, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 201–219.
Taffee, E.J. and H.L. Gauthier. 1973. Geography of Transportation, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
Townsend, A. 2001. Network cities and the global structure of the Internet. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1697–1716.
Urban, D. L. and T. H. Keitt. 2001. Landscape connectedness: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology, 82, 1205–1218.
Warf, B. 1989. Telecommunications and the globalization of financial services. Professional Geographer. 41(3), 257–271.
Wheeler, D.C. and M.E. O’Kelly. 1999. Network topology and city accessibility of the commercial Internet. Professional Geographer, 51(3), 327–339.
Yook, S.H., Jeong, H., and A.L. Barabasi. 2002. Modeling the Internet’s large-scale topology. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences (PNAS), 99, 13382–13386.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schintler, L.A., Gorman, S., Kulkarni, R., Stough, R. (2007). Moving from Protection to Resiliency: A Path to Securing Critical Infrastructure. In: Murray, A.T., Grubesic, T.H. (eds) Critical Infrastructure. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68056-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68056-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68055-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68056-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)