Skip to main content

Continuity in Critical Network Infrastructures: Accounting for Nodal Disruptions

  • Chapter
Critical Infrastructure

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

Since the attacks of September 11 2001, there has been a renewed interest in identifying, protecting and maintaining the functionality of critical infrastructure systems in the United States and abroad. However, because these systems are relatively complex, many difficulties have emerged when attempting to differentiate between elements of the infrastructure that are “critical” and those that are not. In an effort to resolve this issue, the U.S. government has released several important reports detailing the specific infrastructures and assets considered critical to national security, governance, public health, and the economy (White House 2003). Table 10.1 displays the key sectors and assets outlined in the National Strategy for the Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures and Key Assets (Strategy).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albert, R., I. Albert, and G. L. Nakarado. 2004. Physical Review E. 69:(025103) 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, R., H. Jeong, and A. L. Barabasi. 2000. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature. 406: 378–382.

    Article  PubMed  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A. L., R. Albert, and H. Jeong. 2000. Scale-free characteristics of random networks: the topology of the world-wide web. Physica A. 281: 69–77.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A. L., E. Ravasz, and T. Vicsek. 2001. Deterministic scale-free networks. Physica A. 299: 559–564.

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • ben-Avraham, D., A. F. Rozenfeld, R. Cohen, and S. Havlin. 2003. Geographical embedding of scale-free networks. Physica A. 330: 107–116.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Botelho, G. 2003. Power returns to most areas hit by blackout. CNN. URL: http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/08/15/power.outage/

    Google Scholar 

  • Boedhihartono, P. and G. Maral. 2003. Handover evaluation in non-geostationary satellite constellation systems implementing mutual visibility and diversity. Space Communications. 19(1): 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carreras, B. A., V. E. Lynch, I. Dobson, and D. E. Newman. 2002. Critical points and transitions in an electric power transmission model for cascading failure blackouts. Chaos. 12(4): 985–994.

    Article  MATH  PubMed  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. E., W. D. Svekia, and M. Shinozuka. 2002. Linking infrastructure and urban economy: simulation of water disruption impacts in earthquakes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 29: 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, R. L., M. P. Scaparra, and R. S. Middleton. 2004. Identifying Critical Infrastructure: The Median and Covering Facility Interdiction Problems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 94(3): 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, R. L. and M. P. Scaparra. 2005. Protecting critical assets: The r-interdiction median problem with fortification. Working Paper No. 79. Kent Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohan, J. 1978. Multi-objective programming and planning. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbourn, C. J. 1999. Reliability issues in telecommunications network planning’. In, Telecommunications Network Planning, ed. Sans, B. Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comellas, F., J. Ozon, and J. G. Peters. 2000. Deterministic small-world communication networks. Information Processing Letters. 76, 83–90.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Coutard, O, Hanley, R.E., and R. Zimmerman. 2005 (eds.), Sustaining urban networks: The social diffusion of large technical systems. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2005. Network systems revisited: the confounding nature of universal systems. In, Sustaining urban networks: The social diffusion of large technical systems, eds. Coutard, O., Hanley, R.E. and R. Zimmerman. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, H. W. and H. Chang. 1974. Finding the n most vital nodes in a flow network. Management Science. 21: 362–364.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., D. B. Richardson, and T. J. Wilbanks. 2003. A research and action agenda. In The geographical dimensions of terrorism, ed. S. L. Cutter, D. B. Richardson, and T. J. Wilbanks, 223–29. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faisal, H. 2005. Task to detect major fault in Pakistan’s Internet cable set off. Pakistan Times. URL: http://pakistantimes.net/2005/07/04/top1.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M.E., 2002. Using Points of Presence to Measure City Accessibility to the Commercial Internet. Professional Geographer. 54(2):259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubesic, T. H. and A. T. Murray. 2005. Spatial-historical landscapes of telecommunication survivability. Telecommunications Policy. 29(11): 801–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubesic, T. H. and A. T. Murray. 2006. Vital nodes, interconnected infrastructures and the geographies of cascading failure. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 96(1): 64–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubesic, T. H., M. E. O’Kelly, and A. T. Murray. 2003. A Geographic Perspective on Commercial Internet Survivability. Telematics and Informatics. 20: 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houck, D. J., E. Kim, G. P. O’Reilly, D. D. Picklesimer, and H. Uzunalioglu. 2004. A network survivability model for critical national infrastructures. Bell Labs Technical Journal. 8(4): 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. and A. Lefebvre. 2003. U.S. Impact of the Northeast Blackout continues to emerge. URL: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/aug2003/blcka20.shtml

    Google Scholar 

  • Jrad, A., Morawski, T. and L. Spergel. 2004. A model for quantifying business continuity preparedness risks for telecommunications networks. Bell Labs Technical Journal. 9(2): 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kansal, M. L., Kumar, A. and P. B. Sharma. 1995. Reliability analysis of water distribution systems under uncertainty. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 50: 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. G. 2002. Controlling Cascading Failure: Understanding the Vulnerabilities of Interconnected Infrastructure. Journal of Urban Technology. 9(1): 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medhi, D., 1999. Network reliability and fault-tolerance. In, Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, ed. Webster, J. Wiley. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, A.A., Leemis, L. M. and A. Ravindran. 1992. Optimization techniques for system reliability — A review. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 35: 137–146.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly, M.E. and M. W. Horner. 2003. Aggregate Accessibility to Population at the County Level, U.S. 1940–2000. Journal of Geographical Systems, 5(1):5–23.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar, G., Chou, C. H. and H. H. Chou. 2000. Telecommunications network design — Comparison of alternative approaches. Decision Sciences. 31: 483–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff, H. D., Sicilia, G. T. and S. H. Lubore. 1975. Finding the n most vital links in flow networks. Management Science, 21(5): 531–539.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Reuters. 2005. Internet crashes in Pakistan. CNN. URL:http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/06/28/pakistan.internet.reut/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar, S. N., J. Apt, M. Ilic, L. B. Lave, and M. G. Morgan. 2003. Cascading Failures: Survival versus Prevention. The Electricity Journal. November: 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, F. A., Hwang, C. L., and W. Kuo. 1977. Determining component reliability and redundancy for optimum system reliability.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Institute for Telecommunications Services. (1996). Federal Standard 1037C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollmer, R. 1964. Removing arcs from a network. Operations Research. 12(6):934–940.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • White House. (2003). The National Strategy for the Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures and Key Assets. URL: http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/physical_strategy.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, R. 2005. Social implications of infrastructure network interactions. In, Sustaining urban networks: The social diffusion of large technical systems, eds. Coutard, O., Hanley, R.E. and R. Zimmerman. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grubesic, T.H., Murray, A.T., Mefford, J.N. (2007). Continuity in Critical Network Infrastructures: Accounting for Nodal Disruptions. In: Murray, A.T., Grubesic, T.H. (eds) Critical Infrastructure. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68056-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics