Skip to main content

3-D Reconstruction of Nasopharyngeal Airways in Malaysian Subjects

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 15))

Abstract

Objectives: To develop 3-D nasopharyngeal airways from 2-D acoustic rhinometer data for diagnostic purposes. Methods: Rhinometer readings were taken from 285 Malaysian subjects. Data from the right (R) and left (L) nostrils were stratified according to age and sex. The sample comprised: 88 Female Teenagers (FT); 77 Female Adults (FA); 70 Male Teenagers (MT), and 50 Male Adults (MA). New algorithms were developed and encoded in C++ using Air-Ex3™ software. Mean 3-D left and right nasopharyngeal airways were computed for each group, and subjected to finite-element scaling analysis and principal components analysis, using statistical tests for dependent groups. Results: Comparing the corresponding 3-D mean left nasopharyngeal airway with the right side for all four groups, no statistical differences were found. When comparing left sides by age and sex, however, significant differences were detected for the following groups: MAL vs. FTL, MAL vs. FAL, MAL vs. MTL, MTL vs. FTL (p < 0.05). Similarly, for the right side, significant differences were detected for the following groups: MAR vs. FTR, MAR vs. FAR, MAR vs. MTR (p < 0.05), but MTR was not significantly different from FTR. Therefore, the adult Malay male 3-D nasopharyngeal airway differs from females (both teenagers and adults) and teenage males, bilaterally. Specifically, the adult Malay male nasopharyngeal airway is narrower in the anterior nasal valve region closer to the nostril and wider in the distal regions of the 3-D nasopharyngeal airway. Conclusions: This protocol may useful for the diagnosis, treatment planning and assessment of nasopharyngeal conditions, such as snoring, sleep disordered breathing and obstructive sleep apnea. As well, a similar methodology can be applied to 2-D acoustic pharyngometry data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Roberts K, Porter K. (2003) How do you size a nasopharyngeal airway. Resuscitation 56:19–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Filho DI, Raveli DB, Raveli RB et al. (2001) A comparison of naso pharyngeal endoscopy and lateral cephalometric radiography in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal airway obstruction. Am J Orthod Dento facial Orthop 120:348–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nuhoglu Y, Nuhoglu C, Sirlioglu E at al. (2003) Does recurrent sinusitis lead to a sinusitis remodeling of the upper airways in asth matic children with chronic rhinitis? J Investig Allergol Clin Immu nol 13:99–102

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng YS, Holmes TD, Gao J et al. (2001) Characterization of nasal spray pumps and deposition pattern in a replica of the human nasal airway. J Aerosol Med 14:267–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Modrzynski M, Mierzwinski J, Zawisza E et al. (2004) Acoustic rhinometry in the assessment of adenoid hypertrophy in allergic children. Med Sci Monit 10:CR431–8. Epub 2004 Jun 29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tarhan E, Coskun M, Cakmak O et al. (2005) Acoustic rhinometry in humans: accuracy of nasal passage area estimates, and ability to quantify paranasal sinus volume and ostium size. J Appl Physiol 99:616–623. Epub 2005 Mar 31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nurminen M, Hytonen M, Sala E. (2000) Modelling the reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry. Stat Med 19:1179–1189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gosepath J, Belafsky P, Kaldenbach T et al. (2000) The use of acoustic rhinometry in predicting outcomes after sinonasal surgery. Am J Rhinol 14:97–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hilberg O. Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects. (2002) Allergy 57:5–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Djupesland P, Pedersen OF. (2000) Acoustic rhinometry in infants and children. Rhinol Suppl 16:52–58

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lal D, Corey JP. (2004) Acoustic rhinometry and its uses in rhinology and diagnosis of nasal obstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 12:397–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mamikoglu B, Houser S, Akbar I et al. (2000) Acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography scans for the diagnosis of nasal septal deviation, with clinical correlation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:61–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Numminen J, Dastidar P, Heinonen T. (2003) Reliability of acoustic rhinometry. Respir Med 97:421–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cankurtaran M, Celik H, Cakmak O et al. (2003) Effects of the nasal valve on acoustic rhinometry measurements: a model study. J Appl Physiol 94:2166–2172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmad RL, Gendeh BS. (2003) Evaluation with acoustic rhinometry of patients undergoing sinonasal surgery. Med J Malaysia 58:723–728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Terheyden H, Maune S, Mertens J et al. (2000) Acoustic rhinometry: validation by three-dimensionally reconstructed computer tomo graphic scans. J Appl Physiol 89:1013–1021

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Djupesland PG, Rotnes JS. (2001) Accuracy of acoustic rhinometry. Rhinology 39:23–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang ZL, Wang DY, Zhang PC et al. (2001) Evaluation of nasal cavity by acoustic rhinometry in Chinese, Malay and Indian ethnic groups. Acta Otolaryngol 121:844–888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cakmak O, Coskun M, Celik H et al. (2003) Value of acoustic rhinometry for measuring nasal valve area. Laryngoscope 113:295–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang Y, Lang J, Wu J et al. (2004). Acoustic rhinometry measure ment from the patients with deviation of nasal septum. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 18:225–226 [Article in Chinese]

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Capone RB, Sykes JM. (2005) The effect of rhytidectomy on the nasal valve. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7:45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Singh, G.D., Rozihan, M.H., Nidzam, M.T.M., Shamim, A.K., Samsudin, A.R., Suhaimi, D. (2007). 3-D Reconstruction of Nasopharyngeal Airways in Malaysian Subjects. In: Ibrahim, F., Osman, N.A.A., Usman, J., Kadri, N.A. (eds) 3rd Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering 2006. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 15. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68017-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68017-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68016-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68017-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics