Data and Data Presentation



Planning is a process that designs a plan of action or evaluates the impact of a proposed action to achieve a desirable future. During this process planners often obtain the necessary data from different sources, analyze them efficiently and comprehensively, and present the results in easily understandable forms. The rationale for such a process is that public policy and decision makers derive their decisions based on the anticipated future from knowledge about the present and the past of a community. The three-step procedure—data collection, analysis, and presentation has the goal of accurately presenting the information to reflect what has happened and what may happen.


Census Tract Census Bureau Regional Planning Nominal Level Residential Land 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Babbie, Earl R. 2002. The Basics of Social Research, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  2. Babbie, Earl R. 2004. The Practice of Social Research, 10th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  3. Blackwell, Louisa. 2001. Women’s work in UK official statistics and the 1980 reclassification of occupations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 164(2): 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chatterjee, Samprit, Ali S. Hadi and Bertram Price. 2000. Regression Analysis by Example, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. De Vaus, D. A. 2002. Analyzing Social Science Data. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  6. Huang, Nan-zhen. 2001. Urban Development History of Shanghai, China. Available online at: Scholar
  7. Johnson, Robert and Patricia Kuby. 2004. Elementary Statistics, 9th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  8. Office Of Management And Budget (OMB). 1997. Federal Register Notice: Revisions to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity. Washington DC: Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Available online at: 1997standards.html.Google Scholar
  9. Robbin, Alice. 2000. Administrative policy as symbol system: political conflict and the social construction of identity. Administration & Society, 32(4): 398–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rodwin, Lloyd and Bishwapriya Sanyal. (eds.) 2000. The Profession of City Planning: Changes, Images, and Challenges. New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
  11. Sanders, Donald and Robert Smidt. 2000. Statistics—A First Course, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, Stanley K., Jeff Tayman and David A. Swanson. 2001. State and Local Population Projections: Methodology and Analysis. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Spencer, James H. 2004. People, places, and policy: a politically relevant framework for efforts to reduce concentrated poverty. The Policy Studies Journal, 32(4): 545–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. Racial and Ethnic Classifications Used in Census 2000 and Beyond, Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. Last Revised: April 12, 2000 at 01:12:12 pm. Available online at: race/racefactcb.html.Google Scholar
  15. U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. Cartographic Boundary Files. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Cartographic Products Management Branch. Last Revised: April 19, 2005 at 02:12:09 pm. Available online at: Scholar
  16. U.S. Census Bureau. 2004. Terms and Definitions, Population Estimates: Concepts. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. Last revised: August 24, 2004 at 08:15:21 am. Available online at: Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Personalised recommendations