Abstract
This article considers the role and interrelation of the division of labor and the division of knowledge, and its relevance for knowledge-based and evolutionary theories of the firm. As is well known, Adam Smith focused on the effect of the division of labor, while Charles Babbage focused on the effect of the division of knowledge. We are not the first to argue that both are connected in a loop, the division of labor guiding the division of knowledge via learning by doing, and the division of knowledge, in turn, guiding the development of competences for accomplishing steps of the work process. In this article, our main argument is that even knowledge-based and evolutionary approaches to the theory of the firm have focused more on the Smithian than the Babbagian part of the loop. We argue that the impact of the division of knowledge should not be glossed over and perhaps be considered first. The reason is that in the division of knowledge cognition enters the picture and makes a difference, amongst other things on the division of labor. Taking the division of knowledge into account also helps cast light on such important issues as understanding the emergence of routines.
A first version of this paper has been presented at the 10th International Schumpeter Society Conference, Milano, June 9–12, 2004. We thank in particular B. Loasby for his comments during the conference and the referee for his/her remarks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amesse F, Cohendet P (2001) Technology transfer revisited in the perspective of the knowledge based economy. Res Pol, 30,9: 1459–79
Arrow K (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud, 29,3: 155–173
Babbage C (1832/1989) The economy of machinery and manufacturers. In: Campbell-Kelly M (ed.) The Works of Charles Babbage Vol. 8., William Pickering, London
Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage, 17,1: 99–120
Bettis RA, Hitt MA (1995) The new competitive landscape. Strategic Manage J, 16,Summer Special: 7–19
Bierly PE, Chakrabarti AK (1996) Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Manage J, 17: 123–135
Cohen M (1991) Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections. Organ Sci, 2,1: 135–139
Cohen MD, March J, Olsen JP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin Sci Quart, 17
Cohendet P, Llerena P (2001) A dual theory of the firm between transactions and competences. ETIC Conference, Strasbourg, Oct. 2001
Cohendet P, Llerena P (2005) A dual theory of the firm between transactions and competences: Conceptual and empirical considerations. Revue Econ Ind, 2005, 2
Collis DJ, Montgomery CA (1995) Competing on resources, strategy in the 1990’s. Harvard Bus Rev, 1995, July–August: 118–128
Cook SDN, Brown JS (1999) Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Res Pol, 10,4: 381–400
Coriat B, Dosi G (1998) Learning how to govern and learning how to solve problems: On the coevolution of competences, conflicts and organizational routines. In: Chandler AD, Hagström P, Sölvell O (eds.) The Dynamic Firm — The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions, Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cyert RM, March JG (1963/1992) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Blackwell, Oxford, 2nd edn.
D’Aveni RA (1994) Hypercompetition. The Free Press
Dosi G, Marengo L (1994) Some elements of an evolutionary theory of organizational competences. In: England R (ed.) Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics, 157–178, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Fransmann M (1998) Information, knowledge, vision and theories of the firm. In: Dosi G, Teece D, Chytry J (eds.) Technology, Organization, and Competitiveness — Perspectives on Industrial and Corporate Change, 147–192, Oxford University Press, Oxford
Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Manage J, 17,Winter Special: 109–122
Hamel G, Prahalad CK (1994) Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Hodgson G (1993) Economics and Evolution. Polity Press, Cambridge
Hyman A (1982) Charles Babbage: Pioneer of the Computer. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Langlois R, Foss N (1996) Capabilities and governance: the rebirth of production in the theory of economic organisation. Kyklos, 52,2: 201–218
Loasby BJ (1976) Choice, Complexity and Ignorance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Loasby BJ (1983) Knowledge, learning and the enterprise. In: Wiseman J (ed.) Beyond Positive Economics?, 104–121, London, MacMillan
Loasby BJ (1999) Knowledge, Institutions and Evolution in Economics. Routledge, London
Loasby BJ (2000) Organisations as Interpretative Systems. Paper for workshop in Amiens
Marengo L (1994) Knowledge distribution and coordination in organizations: On some social aspects of the exploration vs. exploitation trade-off. Revue Internationale de Systémique, 7: 553–571
Marengo L (1996) Structure, competence and learning in an adaptive model of the firm. In: Dosi G, Malerba F (eds.) Organization and Strategy in the Evolution of the Enterprise, 124–154, Macmillan, Houndmills
Martens B (1999) The evolution of the concept of division of labour in economics. Max Planck Institut für die Erforschung von Wirtschaftssystemen, Discussion paper 18-99
Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Pagano U (1985) Work and Welfare in Economic Theory. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Penrose E (1959/1995) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstone of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Manage J, 14: 179–88
Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy. The Free Press, New York, NY
Porter ME (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creation and Sustaining Superior Performance. Havard Business School Press
Porter ME (1994) The role of location in competition. J Econ Bus, 1: 35–9
Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus Rev, 1990, May–June: 79–91
Simon HA (1982) The economics of information processing. In: Simon HA (ed.) Models of Bounded Rationality Vol. 2, Behavioral Economics and Business Organization, 71–78, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Smith A (1776) The Wealth of Nations
Spanos YE, Lioukas S (2001) An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting Porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Manage J, 22,10: 907–934
Spender JC (1996) Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. StrategicManage J, 17,Winter Special: 45–62
Stigler G (1991) Charles Baggage (1791 + 200 = 1991). J Econ Lit, 29,3: 1149–1152
Teece DJ (1998) Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. Calif Manage Rev, 40,3: 55–79
Teece DJ, Pisano G (1994) The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Ind Corp Change, 3,3: 537–556
Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Manage J, 18,7: 509–533
Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Manage J, 5: 171–180
Williamson OE (1999) Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Manage J, 20: 1087–1108
Winter S (1987) Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In: Teece D (ed.) The competitive challenge-strategies for industrial innovation and renewal, 159–184, Ballinger, Cambridge/MA
Winter SG (1988) On Coase, competence and the corporation. J Law Econ Organ, 4, 1
Winter SG (1995) Four Rs of profitability: Rents, resources, routines, and replication. In: Montgomery C (ed.) Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm-Towards a synthesis, 147–178, Kluwer, Dordrecht
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Becker, M.C., Cohendet, P., Llerena, P. (2007). Division of labor and division of knowledge: Why the nature of the causality matters for the evolutionary theory of the firm. In: Cantner, U., Malerba, F. (eds) Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49465-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49465-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-49464-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49465-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)