Abstract
Innovation is usually thought of as a change in the fundamentals of an economy, which can require adjustments by policy-makers. The latter are usually thought as in regard to a dominant vision, which is to restore an optimal market structure, and leads to a competition policy mainly aimed at controlling for antitrust practices and limiting market power. In this paper, we favor another vision of innovation, as a discovery process that cannot allow ex ante a definition of best practices. Dealing with information issues in two different and alternative perspectives, we argue that antitrust authorities confront a market imperfection-market failure dilemma (MI-MF dilemma) which leads them to favor the existence of appreciative and discretionary policy rather than encouraging the existence of any market structure thought of as optimal as regards the current state of information. We conclude with policy implications, contrasting the EU with the US.
This paper was presented at the 10th International J.A. Schumpeter Society Conference on Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation: Schumpeterian Legacies, Milan 2004. It owes very much to the collaboration of J–L Gaffard with M. Amendola in the recent years. However he is not responsible for the way we have taken advantage of it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amendola M, Bruno S (1990) The behaviour of the innovative firm: relations to the environment. Res Policy 19(5):419–433
Amendola M, Gaffard J-L (1998) Out of equilibrium. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Amendola M, Gaffard J-L, Musso P (2000) Competition, innovation and increasing returns. Econ Innov New Technol 9:149–181
Amendola M, Gaffard J-L, Musso P (2003) Co-ordinating the competition process: the role of finance constraints. Rev Austrian Econ 16(2–3):183–204
Amendola M, Gaffard J-L, Musso P (2004) Viability of innovation processes, emergence and stability of market structures. In: Gallegati M, Kirman A, Marsili M (eds) The complex dynamics of economic interaction. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Baumol WJ (2001) When is inter-firm coordination beneficial? The case of innovation. Int J Ind Organ 19:727–737
Baumol WJ (2002) The free-market innovation machine. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Comanor WS, Leibenstein H (1969) Allocative efficiency, x-efficiency and the measurement of welfare losses. Economica 36:304–309
Crew MA, Rowley CK (1972) Anti-trust policy: economics vs management science. In: Rowley CK (ed) Readings in industrial economics, vol 2, pp 136–149
Dasgupta P, Stiglitz J (1980) Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity. Econ J 90:270–293
Fisher FM (1991) Organizing industrial organization: reflections on the handbook of industrial organization. Brookings Pap Econ Act Microecon:201–240
Fischer FM (2000) The IBM and Microsoft cases: what’s the difference? Am Econ Rev 90(2):180–183
Hicks J (1983) Classics and moderns, collected essays on economic theory, vol 3. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Ledyard JO (1989) Market Failure. In: Earwell J, Milgate M, Newman P (eds) The new Palgrave, allocation, information, and markets. Macmillan, London
Leibenstein H (1966) Allocative efficiency vs x-efficiency. Am Econ Rev 15:341–392
Metcalfe JS (1998) Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. Routledge, London
Metcalfe JS (2000) CRIC (Centre for Research on Competition and Innovation) Mid-term review, Part 2. Research Report, University of Manchester, ESRC
Metcalfe JS, Ramlogan R (2005) Competition and the regulation of economic development. Q Rev Econ Finance 45:215–235
Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Neuman M (2001) Competition policy, history, theory and practice. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Ordover JA, Saloner G (1989) Predation, monopolization, and antitrust. In: Schmalensee R, Willig RD (eds) Handbook of industrial organization, vol 1. North Holland, Amsterdam
Petit M-L, Tolwinski B (1999) R&D cooperation or competition? Eur Econ Rev 43:185–208
Quéré M (2000) Competition as a process: insights from the Marshallian perspective. In: Krafft J (ed) The process of competition. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 49–64
Quéré M (2003) Increasing returns and competition: learning from a Marshallian perspective. In: Arena R, Quéré M (eds) The economics of Alfred Marshall: revisiting Marshall’s legacy. Palgrave, London, pp 182–201
Reinganum J (1989) The timing of innovation: research, development and diffusion. In: Schmalensee R, Willig R (eds) Handbook of industrial organization, vol 1. North Holland, Amsterdam
Richardson GB (1960) Information and investment. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Richardson GB (1965) The theory of restrictive trade practices. Oxf Econ Pap 17(3):432–449
Richardson GB (1975) Adam Smith on competition and increasing returns. In: Skinner A, Wilson T (eds) Essays on Adam Smith. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Reprinted in: Richardson GB (1998) The economics of imperfect knowledge. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Schmalensee R (2000) Antitrust issues in Schumpeterian industries? Am Econ Rev 90(2):192–196
Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Allen & Unwin, London
Scitovsky T (1961) Welfare and competition. Allen and Unwin, London
Stigler GJ (1957) The theory of price, 5th edn. Macmillan, New York
Stiglitz JE (2003) Information and the change in the paradigm in economics In: Arnott R, Greenwald B, Kanbur R, Nalebuff B (eds) Economics for an imperfect world. Essays in honor of Joseph E. Stiglitz. MIT, Cambridge, MA
Williamson OE (1968) Economics as an anti-trust defense: the welfare tradeoffs. Am Econ Rev 58:18–36
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gaffard, JL., Quéré, M. (2007). What’s the aim for competition policy: Optimizing market structure or encouraging innovative behaviors?. In: Cantner, U., Malerba, F. (eds) Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49465-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49465-2_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-49464-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49465-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)