Skip to main content

Accuracy assessment of the SRTM 90m DTM over Greece and its implications to geoid modelling

  • Chapter
Dynamic Planet

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 130))

  • 167 Accesses

Abstract

With the realization of the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) and the distribution of the 3 arcsec (90 m) data over Europe, a high-resolution digital terrain model (DTM) became available for Greece. Until today, high-resolution DTMs for Greece were generated by the Hellenic Military Geographic Service (HMGS) only and present variable resolutions with the finest one being set to 100 m. These DTMs were usually determined by digitizing topographic maps and are thus of variable and sometimes unknown accuracy. When a high-resolution, e.g., 0.5 - 1 arcmin geoid is needed, it is absolutely necessary to employ a very high resolution DTM to compute the terrain effects to gravity and the indirect effect to the geoid. If this information is not available and a coarser DTM is used, then the topographic effects computed are aliased, due to the insufficient resolution of the topographic data used. The scope of this work is twofold. First, a validation and accuracy assessment of the SRTM 90 m DTM over Greece is performed through comparisons with existing global models, like GLOBE and GTOPO30, as well as with the Greek 450 m DTMs delivered by HMGS. Whenever a misrepresentation of the topography is identified in the SRTM data, it is “corrected” using the local 100 m DTM. This processes resulted in an improved SRTM DTM called SRTMG, which was then used to determine terrain and RTM effects to gravity field quantities. Then, all available DTMs were used to compute terrain effects on both gravity anomalies and geoid heights at variable spatial resolutions. From the results acquired, the performance of the SRTMG model with respect to geoid modeling was assessed and conclusions on the effect of the DTM resolution were drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bamler R (1999) The SRTM Mission: A World-Wide 30 m Resolution DEM from SAR Interferometry in 11 Days. In: Fritsch D and Spiller R (eds), Photogrametric Week 99, Wichmann Verlag Heidelberg: 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denker H (2004) Evaluation of SRTM3 and GTOPO30 Terrain Data in Germany. Presented at the Gravity Geoid and Space Missions 2004 (GGSM2004) conference, August 30–September 3, Porto, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • ETOPO (2005) 2-Minute Gridded Global Relief Data (ETOPO2), http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/fliers/01mgg04.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr TG, Kobrick M (2000) Shuttle Radar Topography Mission produces a wealth of data. EOS Trans Amer Geophys U 81: 583–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg R (1984) A study of terrain corrections, density anomalies and geophysical inversion methods in gravity field modelling. Rep no 355, Dept of Geod Sci and Surv, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg R (1985) Gravity field terrain effect computation by FFT. Bull Geod 59:342–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg R, Solheim D (1988) Perfomance of FFT methods in local gravity field modeling. In Chapman conference on Progress in the Determination of the Earth’s Gravity Field. Bahia Mar Hotel, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, September 13–16, 100–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg R, Tscherning CC (1981) The Use of Height Data in Gravity Field Approximation by Collocation. J Geophys Res 86(B9): 7843–7854.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLOBE (2005) The Global Land Onc-km Base Elevation (GLOBE) Project-A 30-arc-second (1-km) gridded, quality-controlled global Digital Elevation Model (DEM), http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/topo/globe.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical Geodesy. WH Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMGS (2005) Hellenic Military Geographic Service Digital Terrain Model (personal communication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti U (2004) Comparison of SRTM data with national DTMs of Switzerland. Presented at the Gravity Geoid and Space Missions 2004 (GGSM2004) conference, August 30–September 3, Porto, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz K-P (1984) Data Types and their Spectral Properties. In: Schwarz K-P (ed), Proc of the Int Summer School on Local Gravity Field Approximation, Beijing, China, 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tziavos IN (1992) Alternative numerical techniques for the efficient computation of terrain corrections and geoid undulations. Presented at the 1st Continental Workshop on the Geoid in Europe-“Towards a Precise Pan European Reference Geoid for the Nineties”, Prague, May 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tziavos IN, Sideris MG, Forsberg R, Schwarz KP (1988) The effect of the terrain on airborne gravity and gradiomctry. J of Geophys Res 93(B8): 9173–9186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tziavos IN, Sideris MG, Forsberg R, Schwarz KP (1992) A study of the contribution of various gravimetric data types on the estimation of gravity field parameters in the mountains. J of Geophys Res 97(B6): 8843–8852.

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS (2005) United States Geological Survey, ftp://edcsgs9.cr.usgs.gov/pub/data/srtm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergos GS, Tziavos IN, Andritsanos VD (2005) On the Determination of Marine Geoid Models by Least Squares Collocation and Spectral Methods Using Heterogeneous Data, in: Sanso F (ed) Proc of International Association of Geodesy Symposia “A Window on the Future of Geodesy”, Vol. 128. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessel P, Smith WHF (1998) New improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released. EOS Trans Amer Geophys U 79(47): 579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichicncharocn C (1982) The indirect effects on the computation of geoids undulations. Rep no 336, Dept of Geod Sci and Surv, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vergos, G.S., Grigoriadis, V.N., Kalampoukas, G., Tziavos, I.N. (2007). Accuracy assessment of the SRTM 90m DTM over Greece and its implications to geoid modelling. In: Tregoning, P., Rizos, C. (eds) Dynamic Planet. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 130. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49350-1_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics