Skip to main content

Feeding Neural Network Models with GPS Observations: A Challenging Task

  • Chapter
Dynamic Planet

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 130))

Abstract

Much has been done in terms of functional and stochastic modelling of observations in space geodesy, aiming at the development of adequate adjustment models. One of the techniques, which has been the focus of more attention in the last years, is the Neural Network model. Although not trivial to be used, this kind of model provides an extreme adaptation capability, which can be an issue of fundamental importance for certain applications. In this paper we discuss the use of GPS observations in Neural Networks models, providing a brief description how a neural model works and what are its restrictions, as well as how to treat the GPS observations in order to satisfy them.

A Neural Network is an information processing system formed by a big number of simple processing elements, called artificial neurons. Typically the input values must be normalized, with typical range [0,1], or alternatively [−1,1]. After processed, the signal can be transformed back to its original origin and amplitude. When dealing with GPS observations, namely ranges and range rates, the absolute numerical values are usually pretty large (e.g. order of 20 millions of meters for ranges) coupled with precisions in the order of mm for carrier-phase and meter for pseudoranges. The observations need to be modified to avoid degrading their precision during the normalization, in order to make the application of neural models suitable for GPS data.

In this work methods to make the use of GPS data possible in neural models are discussed and showed with real examples. The analysis is made for both pseudoranges and carrier-phases. It is demonstrated that with the adequate treatment the use of those observables can be made without degradation of precision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7 References

  • Chang, Y. M.; Chen, C. H.; Chen, C. S. (1996). Optimal Observation Design of Surveying Network using Artificial Neural Network. Geomatics Research Australasia, No.64, June, 1996, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chansarkar, M. (1999). GPS Navigation using Neural Networks. 12th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, September 14–17, 1999, Nashville Convention Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumville, M. and Tsakiri, M. (1994). An Adaptive Filter for Land Navigation Using Neural Computing. 7th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, September 20–23, 1994, Salt Palace Convention Center-Salt Lake City, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haykin, S. (1999). Neural Networks — A Comprehensive Foundation. Prentice Hall — Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhar, M.; Stopar, B.; Turk, G.; Ambrozic, T. (2001). The use of artificial neural network in geoid surface approximation. Allgemeine Vermessungs-Nachrichten, Vol. 108, No. 1, 2001, pp. 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leandro, R. F. (2004). A New Technique to TEC Regional Modeling using a Neural Network. ION GNSS 2004, September, 2004, Long Beach, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leandro, R. F. and Santos, M. C. (2004). Comparison between autoregressive model and neural network for forecasting space environment parameters. Bollettino di Geodesia e Scienze Affini, Vol.63, No.3, 2004, pp. 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maia, T.C.B., Silva C.A.U., Leandro R.F., Segantine P.C.L., Romero R.A.F. (2002). Predição da Contagem de Ciclos da Portadora GPS Utilizando uma Modelagem Conexionista Temporal — FIR MLP. XVI Brazilian Symposium on Neural Networks. Porto de Galinhas, Recife, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuh, H.; Ulrich, M.; Egger, D.; Mueller, J.; Schwegmann, W. (2002). Prediction of Earth orientation parameters by artificial neural networks. Journal of Geodesy, Vol.76, No.5, 2002, pp. 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, J. L. and King, L. R. (2002). Use of Neural Networks and Expert Systems for Rapid Differential GPS Navigation. ION GPS 2002, September 24–27, 2002, Oregon Convention Center, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenos, T. D. and Stergiou, D. C. (2002). One day before foF2 neural network based prediction models: A performance comparison between ordinary, fuzzy and recurrent neural networks. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica, Vol.37, No.2–3, 2002, pp. 293–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leandro, R.F., Silva, C.A.U., Santos, M.C. (2007). Feeding Neural Network Models with GPS Observations: A Challenging Task. In: Tregoning, P., Rizos, C. (eds) Dynamic Planet. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 130. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49350-1_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics