Abstract
We conduct an experiment to investigate the degree to which deviations from exponential discounting can be accounted for by the hypothesis of hyperbolic discounting. Subjects are asked to choose between an earlier or later payoff in series of forty choice questions. Each question consists of a pair of monetary amounts determined by compounding a given base amount at a constant rate per period. Two bases (8 and 20 dollars), three compounding rates (low, medium and high) and three delays (two, four, and six weeks) are each used. There are also two initial periods (today and two weeks) and there are two separate questionnaires, one with lower “realistic” compounding rates and the other with higher compounding rates, typical of those used in previous studies. We analyze the detailed patterns of choice in 6 groups of 6 related questions each (in which the base and rate is fixed but the initial period and delay varies), documenting the frequency of patterns consistent with exponential discounting and with hyperbolic discounting. We find that exponential discounting is the clear modal choice pattern in virtually all cases. Hyperbolic discounting is never the modal pattern (except in the sense that constant discounting is a special case of hyperbolic discounting). We also estimate a linear probability model that takes account of individual heterogeneity. The estimates show substantial increases in the probability of choosing the later option when the compounding rate increases, as one would expect. There are small, sometimes significant, increases in this probability when the delay is increased or the initial period is in the future. Such behavior is consistent with hyperbolic discounting, but can account for only a small proportion of choices. Overall, deviations from exponential discounting appear to be due to error, or to other effects not accounted for by hyperbolic discounting. Principal among these is an increase in later choices when the base is larger.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ainslie, G., Haendel, V. (1983), “The Motives of Will,” in Etiologic Aspects of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, ed. E Gotthell, Druley, K., Skoloda, T., Waxman, H., Springfield, IL: Thomas, Charles.
Benzion, U., Rapoport, A., Yagil, J. (1989) “Discount Rates Inferred From Decisions: An Experimental Study,” Management Science, 35:270–284.
Holcomb, J., Nelson, P.S. (1992) “Another Experimental Look at Individual Time Preference,” Rationality and Society, 4:2:199–220.
Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D. (1992) “Anomalies In Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107:2:573–597.
Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D. (1993) “Preference for Sequences of Outcomes,” Psychological Review, 100(1):91–108.
Loewenstein, G., Thaler, R. (1989) “Anomalies: Intertemporal Choice,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3:181–193.
Mischel, W. (1966) “Theory and Research On The Antecedence of Self-Imposed Delay of Reward”, Progress In Experimental Personality Research, 3:85–132.
Mischel, W. (1974) “Processes In Delay of Gratification,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. L. Berkowitz, New York: Academic Press.
Mischel, W., Ebbenson, E. (1970) “Attention and Delay of Gratification,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16:329–337.
Rachlin, H. (1974) “Self-control,” Behaviorism, 2:94–107.
Strotz, R.H. (1955) “Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization,” Review of Economic Studies, 8:165–180.
Thaler, R. (1981) “Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency,” Economics Letters, 8:201–207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sopher, B., Sheth, A. (2007). A Deeper Look at Hyperbolic Discounting. In: Abdellaoui, M., Luce, R.D., Machina, M.J., Munier, B. (eds) Uncertainty and Risk. Theory and Decision Library C, vol 41. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48935-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48935-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-48934-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48935-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)