Skip to main content

On the Quantification and Decomposition of Uncertainty

  • Chapter
Uncertainty and Risk

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library C ((TDLC,volume 41))

Abstract

In this work we deal with the quantitative assessment and decomposition of uncertainty. The decision making process is often accompanied by an uncertainty propagation exercise in the practice. We first analyze the meaning of uncertainty propagation from a subjective decision-making point of view. We show that, in order to quantify uncertainty, one has to resort to the distribution of the expected utility (U) originated from parameter uncertainty. We undertake the analytical determination of the moments U. We show that, if one considers the uncertain parameter space as subdivided in alternative preference regions delimited by indifference hypersurfaces, the moments of U are the sum of the moments of the expected utility of alternatives in the regions alternatives are preferred. As a consequence, if an alternative is never preferable, it does not contribute to uncertainty. In order to decompose uncertainty, we focus on the variance of U. By stating of Sobol’ variance decomposition theorem in the Decision-Theory framework, we show that the variance of U can be expressed as sum of the variances brought by uncertain parameters individually and/or in groups. We then determine and discuss the meaning of global importance of parameters. Since parameters associated with the highest value of the global importance are the most effective in reducing uncertainty, gathering information on these parameters would reduce uncertainty in the most effective way. We illustrate the moment calculation and variance decomposition procedures by means of an analytical example. The application to the uncertainty analysis of an industrial investment decision-making problem concludes the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apostolakis, G.E. (1995), “A Commentary on Model Uncertainty”, Proceedings of the Workshop on Model Uncertainty: its Characterization and Quantification, published by Center for Reliability Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Archer, G.E.B., Saltelli, A., Sobol, I.M. (1997), “Sensitivity measures, ANOVA-like techniques and the use of bootstrap”, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 58, pp. 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anscombe, F.J., Aumann, R. J. (1963), “A Definition of Subjective Probability”, Annual of Mathematical Statistics, 34, pp. 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Allais, M. (1953), “Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant de risque: critique de le postulats et axiommes de l’ecole Americaine”, Econometrica, 21, pp. 503–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger, J. (1985), “Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis”, Springer Series in Statistics, Second Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borgonovo, E. (2001), “Importance Relations and Sensitivity Analysis in Decision Theory”, Proceedings of the Tenth International conference on Foundations and Applications of Utility, Risk and Decision Theory, Torino, May 30–June 2 2001, pp. 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borgonovo, E., Apostolakis, G.E., Tarantola, S., Saltelli, A. (2003), “Comparison of Local and Global Sensitivity Analysis Techniques in Probabilistic Safety Assessment”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 79, pp. 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brams (1998), “Backward Induction Is Not Robust”, Theory and Decision, 45, pp.263–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chenghu Ma (2001), “A No-Trade Theorem under Knightian Uncertainty with General Preferences”, Theory and Decision, 51(2), pp. 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chow, Sarin (2002), “Known, Unknown and Unknowable Uncertainty”, 52, Theory and Decision, pp. 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Celemen, R.T. (1997), “Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis”, II Edition, Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA; ISBN: 0534260349.

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Finetti, B. (1937), “La prevision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives”, Annales de l’Institute Henri Poincarè, Vol. 7, 1–68. Translated into English by H.E. Kyburg and reprinted in Kyburg and Smokler (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eichberger, J. (1997), “Dynamically Consistent Preferences with Quadratic Beliefs”, The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(2), 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eichberger, J. (1999), “E-Capacities and the Ellsberg Paradox”, Theory and Decision, 46(2), pp. 107–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellsberg, D. (1961), “Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, pp. 643–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fishburn, P.C. (1994), “A Variational Model of Preference under Uncertainty”, The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8(2), pp. 127–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Helton, J.C. (1993), “Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Use in Performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 42, 327–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hofer, E. (1999), “Sensitivity Analysis in the Context of Uncertainty Analysis for Computational Intensive Models”, Computer Physics Communications, 177, 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keeney, R., Raiffa, H. (1993), “Decisions with Multiple Objectives”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., ISBN 0-521-43883-7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Knight (1921), “Risk Uncertainty and Profit”, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kobberling, V., Wakker, P.P. (2004), “A Simple Tool for Qualitatively Testing, Quantitatively Measuring, and Normatively Justifying Savages Subjective Expected Utility”, The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28(2), pp. 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kreps, D.M. (1988), “Notes on the Theory of Choice”, Underground Classics in Economics, Westview Press Inc., Colorado, USA, ISBN 0-88133-7553-3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Iman, R.L., Conover, W.J. (1987), “A Measure of Top-down Correlation”, Technometrics, 29(3), pp. 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Iman, R.L., Hora, S.C. (1990), “A Robust Measure of Uncertainty Importance for Use in Fault Tree System Analysis”, Risk Analysis, 10(3), pp. 401–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Machina, M. (2004), “Almost Objective Uncertainty”, Economic Theory, 24(1), pp. 1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McKay, M.D. (1996), “Variance-Based Methods for Assessing Uncertainty Importance”, in NUREG-1150 Analyses, LA-UR-96-2695, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Montesano (2001), “Uncertainty with Partial Information on the Possibility of the Events”, Theory and Decision, 51, pp. 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Morris (1997), “Risk, Uncertainty and Hidden Information”, Theory and Decision, 42, pp. 235–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ivanenko, V.I., Munier, B. (2000), “Decision Making in ‘Random in a Broad Sense’ Environments”, Theory and Decision, 49(2): 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pratt, J.W., Raiffa, H., Schlaifer, R. (1995), “Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory”, The MIT Press, 904 pages, ISBN: 0262161443.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Quiggin, J. (2001), “Production under Uncertainty and Choice under Uncertainty in the Emergence of Generalized Expected Utility Theory”, Theory and Decision, 51(2), pp. 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Savage, L. (1972), The Foundations of Statistics, Dover Publications, Second Edition, 39, pp. 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schlee, E.E. (1997), “The sure thing principle and the value of information”, Theory and Decision, 42(1), pp. 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Saltelli, A. (1997), “The Role of Sensitivity Analysis in the Corroboration of Models and its Link to Model Structural and Parametric Uncertainty”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 57, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Chan, K.P.-S. (1999), “A Quantitative Model — Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output”, Technometrics, 41,1, 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Saltelli, A., Sobol, I.M. (1995), “About the Use of Rank Transformation in Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 50, 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sobol, I.M. (2001), “Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates”, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 55(1), pp. 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sobol, I.M. (1993), “Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models”, Matem. Modelirovanie, 2(1) (1990) 112–118 (in Russian). English Transl.: MMCE, 1 (4) (1993) 407–414.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sobol, I.M. (1967), “On the Distribution of Points in a Cube and the Approximate Evaluation of Integrals”, USSR Comp. Math. Phys., 7, 86–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sobol, I.M. (1993), “Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models”, Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiments, 1(4), pp. 407–414.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Winston, W. (1998), “Financial Models Using Simulation and Optimization”, Palisade Editor, Newfield, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Borgonovo, E., Peccati, L. (2007). On the Quantification and Decomposition of Uncertainty. In: Abdellaoui, M., Luce, R.D., Machina, M.J., Munier, B. (eds) Uncertainty and Risk. Theory and Decision Library C, vol 41. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48935-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics