Abstract
In this work we deal with the quantitative assessment and decomposition of uncertainty. The decision making process is often accompanied by an uncertainty propagation exercise in the practice. We first analyze the meaning of uncertainty propagation from a subjective decision-making point of view. We show that, in order to quantify uncertainty, one has to resort to the distribution of the expected utility (U) originated from parameter uncertainty. We undertake the analytical determination of the moments U. We show that, if one considers the uncertain parameter space as subdivided in alternative preference regions delimited by indifference hypersurfaces, the moments of U are the sum of the moments of the expected utility of alternatives in the regions alternatives are preferred. As a consequence, if an alternative is never preferable, it does not contribute to uncertainty. In order to decompose uncertainty, we focus on the variance of U. By stating of Sobol’ variance decomposition theorem in the Decision-Theory framework, we show that the variance of U can be expressed as sum of the variances brought by uncertain parameters individually and/or in groups. We then determine and discuss the meaning of global importance of parameters. Since parameters associated with the highest value of the global importance are the most effective in reducing uncertainty, gathering information on these parameters would reduce uncertainty in the most effective way. We illustrate the moment calculation and variance decomposition procedures by means of an analytical example. The application to the uncertainty analysis of an industrial investment decision-making problem concludes the paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Apostolakis, G.E. (1995), “A Commentary on Model Uncertainty”, Proceedings of the Workshop on Model Uncertainty: its Characterization and Quantification, published by Center for Reliability Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Archer, G.E.B., Saltelli, A., Sobol, I.M. (1997), “Sensitivity measures, ANOVA-like techniques and the use of bootstrap”, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 58, pp. 99–120.
Anscombe, F.J., Aumann, R. J. (1963), “A Definition of Subjective Probability”, Annual of Mathematical Statistics, 34, pp. 199–205.
Allais, M. (1953), “Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant de risque: critique de le postulats et axiommes de l’ecole Americaine”, Econometrica, 21, pp. 503–546.
Berger, J. (1985), “Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis”, Springer Series in Statistics, Second Edition.
Borgonovo, E. (2001), “Importance Relations and Sensitivity Analysis in Decision Theory”, Proceedings of the Tenth International conference on Foundations and Applications of Utility, Risk and Decision Theory, Torino, May 30–June 2 2001, pp. 20–23.
Borgonovo, E., Apostolakis, G.E., Tarantola, S., Saltelli, A. (2003), “Comparison of Local and Global Sensitivity Analysis Techniques in Probabilistic Safety Assessment”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 79, pp. 175–185.
Brams (1998), “Backward Induction Is Not Robust”, Theory and Decision, 45, pp.263–289.
Chenghu Ma (2001), “A No-Trade Theorem under Knightian Uncertainty with General Preferences”, Theory and Decision, 51(2), pp. 173–181.
Chow, Sarin (2002), “Known, Unknown and Unknowable Uncertainty”, 52, Theory and Decision, pp. 127–138.
Celemen, R.T. (1997), “Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis”, II Edition, Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA; ISBN: 0534260349.
de Finetti, B. (1937), “La prevision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives”, Annales de l’Institute Henri Poincarè, Vol. 7, 1–68. Translated into English by H.E. Kyburg and reprinted in Kyburg and Smokler (1964).
Eichberger, J. (1997), “Dynamically Consistent Preferences with Quadratic Beliefs”, The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(2), 189–207.
Eichberger, J. (1999), “E-Capacities and the Ellsberg Paradox”, Theory and Decision, 46(2), pp. 107–138.
Ellsberg, D. (1961), “Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, pp. 643–669.
Fishburn, P.C. (1994), “A Variational Model of Preference under Uncertainty”, The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8(2), pp. 127–52.
Helton, J.C. (1993), “Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Use in Performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 42, 327–367.
Hofer, E. (1999), “Sensitivity Analysis in the Context of Uncertainty Analysis for Computational Intensive Models”, Computer Physics Communications, 177, 21–34.
Keeney, R., Raiffa, H. (1993), “Decisions with Multiple Objectives”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., ISBN 0-521-43883-7.
Knight (1921), “Risk Uncertainty and Profit”, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kobberling, V., Wakker, P.P. (2004), “A Simple Tool for Qualitatively Testing, Quantitatively Measuring, and Normatively Justifying Savages Subjective Expected Utility”, The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28(2), pp. 135–145.
Kreps, D.M. (1988), “Notes on the Theory of Choice”, Underground Classics in Economics, Westview Press Inc., Colorado, USA, ISBN 0-88133-7553-3.
Iman, R.L., Conover, W.J. (1987), “A Measure of Top-down Correlation”, Technometrics, 29(3), pp. 351–357.
Iman, R.L., Hora, S.C. (1990), “A Robust Measure of Uncertainty Importance for Use in Fault Tree System Analysis”, Risk Analysis, 10(3), pp. 401–406.
Machina, M. (2004), “Almost Objective Uncertainty”, Economic Theory, 24(1), pp. 1–54.
McKay, M.D. (1996), “Variance-Based Methods for Assessing Uncertainty Importance”, in NUREG-1150 Analyses, LA-UR-96-2695, 1–27.
Montesano (2001), “Uncertainty with Partial Information on the Possibility of the Events”, Theory and Decision, 51, pp. 183–195.
Morris (1997), “Risk, Uncertainty and Hidden Information”, Theory and Decision, 42, pp. 235–270.
Ivanenko, V.I., Munier, B. (2000), “Decision Making in ‘Random in a Broad Sense’ Environments”, Theory and Decision, 49(2): 127–150.
Pratt, J.W., Raiffa, H., Schlaifer, R. (1995), “Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory”, The MIT Press, 904 pages, ISBN: 0262161443.
Quiggin, J. (2001), “Production under Uncertainty and Choice under Uncertainty in the Emergence of Generalized Expected Utility Theory”, Theory and Decision, 51(2), pp. 125–144.
Savage, L. (1972), The Foundations of Statistics, Dover Publications, Second Edition, 39, pp. 31–33.
Schlee, E.E. (1997), “The sure thing principle and the value of information”, Theory and Decision, 42(1), pp. 21–36.
Saltelli, A. (1997), “The Role of Sensitivity Analysis in the Corroboration of Models and its Link to Model Structural and Parametric Uncertainty”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 57, 1–4.
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Chan, K.P.-S. (1999), “A Quantitative Model — Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output”, Technometrics, 41,1, 39–56.
Saltelli, A., Sobol, I.M. (1995), “About the Use of Rank Transformation in Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 50, 225–239.
Sobol, I.M. (2001), “Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates”, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 55(1), pp. 271–280.
Sobol, I.M. (1993), “Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models”, Matem. Modelirovanie, 2(1) (1990) 112–118 (in Russian). English Transl.: MMCE, 1 (4) (1993) 407–414.
Sobol, I.M. (1967), “On the Distribution of Points in a Cube and the Approximate Evaluation of Integrals”, USSR Comp. Math. Phys., 7, 86–112.
Sobol, I.M. (1993), “Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models”, Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiments, 1(4), pp. 407–414.
Winston, W. (1998), “Financial Models Using Simulation and Optimization”, Palisade Editor, Newfield, NY, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Borgonovo, E., Peccati, L. (2007). On the Quantification and Decomposition of Uncertainty. In: Abdellaoui, M., Luce, R.D., Machina, M.J., Munier, B. (eds) Uncertainty and Risk. Theory and Decision Library C, vol 41. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48935-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48935-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-48934-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48935-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)