Skip to main content
  • 1149 Accesses

Concerning the management structure, EJVs generally adopt the general manager responsibility mechanism under the guidance of board of directors. CJVs normally adopt one of the following three managing methods: (1) The general manager responsibility mechanism under the guidance of board of directors, applicable to companies with limited liabilities and legal entity qualification. (2) Joint management, applicable to cooperatives without legal entities established. (3)Entrusted management, applicable to legal entity or non legal entity cooperatives. There are two ways of entrusted management. One is full authority entrust by the cooperative for one party’s management, another is full authority entrust by the cooperative for a third party’s management. The management modes of WOFEs and joint ventures are similar. The author mainly discusses management problems of Equity Joint Ventures in this article, but these problems also exist in enterprises of the other two types in certain degree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Geringer, J.M. and L. Herbert (1991), Measuring Performance of International Joint Venture, Journal of International Business studies, 19:365–388.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Geringer, J.M. and L. Herbert (1991), Measuring Performance of International Joint Venture, Journal of International Business studies 19:365–388.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deng Jin (2005), The Twenty Years of Multinationals: We Need New Foreign Affair Strategies, the Southern Weekend on 8 September.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Masahiko Aoki and Qian Yingyi (1996), View the Corporate Governance in Transition Economy, China Economy Publishing House, pp213; Zhang Weiying (1995), the Entrepreneurs in Enterprises-Contract Theories, Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore and Shanghai People’s Publishing House; Zhang Weiying (1999), the Enterprise Theories and Reform on Chinese Enterprises, Beijing University Publishing House, pp 122.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li Wei’an and Wu Xianming (2002), The Analysis of Sino-foreign Joint Venture Parent Company Guiding Type Company Management Mode, World Economy and Politics, Issue 5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Weiying (2005), The Property Rights, Incentives and Company Management, the Economy and Science Publishing House, pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lu Changcong, Zhen Wenquan, Li Zhongguang (2004), The Property Right Variation and Proceeds Dispute in Sino-foreign Joint Ventures, the China Industry Economy in Issue 11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Multinationals mainly realize matching or unifying of material control right and monopolized proceeds right through the strategy of ‘conspired losses’. The concrete operation route is:(1)transfer profits and assets of joint ventures with all kinds of methods, causing loss and asset outflow of joint ventures; (2)increase capital input and enlarge share holding proportion till share control or even wholly foreign owned using the chance of Chinese parties’ inability to make up losses. Main methods of turning joint ventures into loss by multinationals are: (2)raise price of using key resources including technology and transfer profits to wholly owned subsidies within Chinese territory; (2)transfer profits to subsidies abroad with ‘high purchase price and low selling price, and two endings abroad’; (3)implement market expansion strategy and increase market input; (4)increase numbers of joint ventures and divide sales districts. See Lu Changcong, Zhen Wenquan, Li Zhongguang (2004), the Property Right Variation and Proceeds Dispute in Sino-foreign Joint Ventures, the China Industry Economy, Issue 11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Xiaoling (2004), The Carrying on Joint Venture by Chinese Automobile Companies to the End?, Commerce Weekly, Issue 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Xiaoling, How Far Could Chinese Automobile Joint Venture Go? South Weekend on 2 February 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li Zhijun, Is Decrease in Automobile Joint Venture Profits Value Return or Transfer? Economy Observance on 6 August 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Luan Jianqi (2003), Discussion on Problems in Transfer of Trademark Rights in Foreign-invested Enterprises, Contemporary Law, Issue 3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cases quoted in this article and the five principles of dong Feng Nissan Basic Rules is from the From Joint Venture to Harmony by Yang Yunlong and Fu Qiang (2005), published in the Science and Technology Brainpower, issue 8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See latest discussion on policy of exchanging market with technology and self-innovation. Wang Xiaoling (2004), The Re-thinking of FDI Strategy, Commerce Weekly, Issue, 3; Lu Feng, Feng Kaidong(2004), the Foundation for Failure in Automobile Industry, the Internal Reference of Reform, Issue 13,; Zhang Jingping (2005), the Chinese Strategic Orientation of Self Independence, the Economic Observance on 17 October.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Corporate Governance Troubles in Sino-foreign Joint Ventures. In: The Legal Environment and Risks for Foreign Investment in China. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48377-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics