Skip to main content

Jam-Avoiding Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) and its Impact on Traffic Dynamics

  • Conference paper
Traffic and Granular Flow’05

Summary

Adaptive-Cruise Control (ACC) automatically accelerates or decelerates a vehicle to maintain a selected time gap, to reach a desired velocity, or to prevent a rear-end collision. To this end, the ACC sensors detect and track the vehicle ahead for measuring the actual distance and speed difference. Together with the own velocity, these input variables are exactly the same as in car-following models. The focus of this contribution is: What will be the impact of a spreading of ACC systems on the traffic dynamics? Do automated driving strategies have the potential to improve the capacity and stability of traffic flow or will they necessarily increase the heterogeneity and instability? How does the result depend on the ACC equipment level?

We discuss microscopic modeling aspects for human and automated (ACC) driving. By means of microscopic traffic simulations, we study how a variable percentage of ACC-equipped vehicles influences the stability of traffic flow, the maximum flow under free traffic conditions until traffic breaks down, and the dynamic capacity of congested traffic. Furthermore, we compare different percentages of ACC with respect to travel times in a specific congestion scenario. Remarkably, we find that already a small amount of ACC equipped cars and, hence, a marginally increased free and dynamic capacity, leads to a drastic reduction of traffic congestion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. “European Commission (Energy & Transport), White Paper European transport policy for 2010: time to decide,”, COM (2001) 370 final.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Minderhoud, Supported Driving: Impacts on Motorway Traffic Flow (Delft University Press, Delft, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Treiber and D. Helbing, “Microsimulations of freeway traffic including control measures”, Automatisierungstechnik 49, 478–484 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. L. Davis, “Effect of adaptive cruise control systems on traffic flow”, Phys. Rev. E 69, 066110 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Marsden, M. McDonald, and M. Brackstone, “Towards an understanding of adaptive cruise control”, Transportation Research C 9, 33–51 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. S. Kerner, The Physics of Traffic (Springer, Heidelberg, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Helbing, “Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems”, Review of Modern Physics 73, 1067–1141 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Nagel, P. Wagner, and R. Woesler, “Still flowing: old and new approaches for traffic flow modeling”, Operations Research 51, 681–710 (2003).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Treiber, A. Hennecke, and D. Helbing, “Derivation, properties, and simulation of a gas-kinetic-based, non-local traffic model”, Phys. Rev. E 59, 239–253 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Knospe, L. Santen, A. Schadschneider, and M. Schreckenberg, “Single-vehicle data of highway traffic: Microscopic description of traffic phases”, Phys. Rev. E 65, 056133 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Tilch and D. Helbing, “Evaluation of single vehicle data in dependence of the vehicle-type, lane, and site”, in Traffic and Granular Flow’ 99, D. Helbing, H. Herrmann, M. Schreckenberg, and D. Wolf, eds., (Springer, Berlin, 2000), pp. 333–338.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Treiber, A. Kesting, and D. Helbing, “Understanding widely scattered traffic flows, the capacity drop, and platoons as effects of variance-driven time gaps”, Phys. Rev. E 74, 016123 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Green, “‘How long does it take to stop?’ Methodological analysis of driver perception-brake Times”, Transportation Human Factors 2, 195–216 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Treiber, A. Kesting, and D. Helbing, “Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models”, Physica A 359, 729–746 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Treiber, A. Hennecke, and D. Helbing, “Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations”, Physical Review E 62, 1805–1824 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Daganzo, M. Cassidy, and R. Bertini, “Possible explanations of phase transitions in highway traffic”, Transportation Research B 33, 365–379 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Treiber, A. Kesting, and D. Helbing, “Variance-driven traffic dynamics and statistical aspects of single-vehicle data”, in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Schönhof, A. Kesting, M. Treiber, and D. Helbing, “Inter-Vehicle Communication on highways: Statistical properties of information propagation”, in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kesting, A., Treiber, M., Schönhof, M., Kranke, F., Helbing, D. (2007). Jam-Avoiding Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) and its Impact on Traffic Dynamics. In: Schadschneider, A., Pöschel, T., Kühne, R., Schreckenberg, M., Wolf, D.E. (eds) Traffic and Granular Flow’05. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47641-2_62

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics