Skip to main content

Accidents in Platoons of Vehicles

  • Conference paper
Traffic and Granular Flow’05

Summary

In dense vehicular traffic cars often drive at close distances, they form clusters or platoons. Within these platoons, time headways are observed, which are often even shorter than the reaction time of the drivers - a situation which is potentially dangerous.

Here we propose a simple dynamical model for a platoon undergoing emergency braking, which takes into account the individual variations of the reaction time and braking capacities. We apply the model to real platoons, i.e. platoons which have been identified in large sets of single-vehicle traffic data. We use our results in order to compare the impact of different possible regulations (speed limit, minimum headway).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Aron, M.-B. Biecheler, and J.-F. Peytavin. Sécurité routière-temps intervéhiculaires et vitesse. quels enjeux de sécurité sur l’autoroute? Recherche Transports Sécurité, 64:3–17, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Brackstone, M. McDonald, and B. Sultan. A collision model for the assessment of the safety benefits of avcss. Proc. of the 6th ITS World Congress, Toronto, Canada., Nov., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Carbaugh, D.N. Godbole, and R. Sengupta. Safety and capacity analysis of automated and manual highway systems. Transportation Research Part C, 6:69–99, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodger J. Koppa. Human factors. In Traffic Flow Theory, pages 3–1, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Des progrès pour la sécurité-l’automobile citoyenne. Les dossiers du CCFA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.J. Kiefer, M.T. Cassar, C.A. Flanagan, C.J. Jerome, and M.D. Palmer. Surprise braking trials, time-to-collision judgments and “first look” maneuvers under realistic rear-end crash scenarios. In DC Contract DTFH61-01-X-00014, Washington, editor, Performed by Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership (CAMP), August 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Appert and L. Santen. Accidents in dense vehicular traffic. preprint, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Lenz, C.K. Wagner, and R. Sollacher. Multi-anticipative car-following model. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter, 7:331–335, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Treiber, A. Kesting, and D. Helbing. Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models. Physica A, 360:71–88, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S.P. Hoogendoorn, S. Ossen, and M. Schreuder. Multi-anticipative car-following behavior: and empirical analysis. preprint, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Appert-Rolland, C., Santen, L. (2007). Accidents in Platoons of Vehicles. In: Schadschneider, A., Pöschel, T., Kühne, R., Schreckenberg, M., Wolf, D.E. (eds) Traffic and Granular Flow’05. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47641-2_61

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics