Skip to main content

Low Magnification Unstable Resonators Using Radially Varying Birefringent Elements

  • Conference paper
Tunable Solid-State Lasers II

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Optical Sciences ((SSOS,volume 52))

  • 262 Accesses

Abstract

It has been shown theoretically that a gaussian gain profile can confine an unstable resonator mode so that such a mode has a finite but large beam radius [1–4]. The stabilization of a large beam radius by a radially dependent gain profile has also been experimentally verified [5]. A gaussian loss element (i.e., a gaussian reflector) can also affect the beam profile in a similar manner [6–8]. More recently, Eggleston et al [9] have pointed out that a radially birefringent reflector can be approximated as a gaussian reflector, and have shown that such an element can support a large unstable resonator mode which does not suffer Fresnel fringing due to sharp changes in the reflectivity typical for an unstable resonator. This fringing can be a source of regions of high intensities which can cause optical damage. Giuliani et al [10] have shown that such a radial birefringent element (RBE) unstable resonator can be applied to a pulsed Nd:YAG laser. Ruby and alexandrite are usually oscillated at lower gain configuration than Nd:YAG so that low magnification unstable resonators are necessary to support an unstable resonator mode. Low magnification unstable resonators have higher internal standing wave power densities and have a greater problem with Fresnel fringing and, hence, are more susceptible to optical damage. Low magnification unstable resonators are less stable against perturbations in the unstable resonator mode which can also lead to damage [4,10]. All experiments with “Polka Dot” unstable resonators with alexandrite lasers have led to optical damage at relatively low output powers due to a stable mode oscillating from the central high reflectivity “Polka Dot” [11]. In this paper a low magnification unstable resonator using radially birefringent elements which is less susceptible to damage is described. This resonator is less susceptible to damage for two reasons. One reason is the radially birefringent element is a soft aperture without Fresnel fringing effect. Also, in the configuration used in our experiments, the Q for the unstable resonator mode was comparable to the Q for stable mode, so accidental lasing in lower order modes did not cause optical damage. In this paper we will also describe our results with this resonator for alexandrite and ruby.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Kogelnik, Appl. Opt. 4, 1562–1569 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. L.W. Casperson and A. Yariv, Appl. Opt. 11, 462–466 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. G.J. Ernst and W.J. Witteman, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., QE-9, 911–918, (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. L.W. Casperson, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., QE-10, 629–634 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. L.W. Casperson and A. Yariv, Appl. Phys. Lett., 12, 355–357 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Zucker, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 49, 2343–2376 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Yariv and P. Yeh, Opt. Commun. 13, 370–374 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A.N. Chester, Appl. Opt. 11, 2584–2590 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J.M. Eggleston, G. Giuliani, and R.L. Byer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 1264–1272 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Giuliani, Y.K. Park, and R.L. Byer, Opt. Lett. 5, 491–493 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Unpublished results by D. Harter and also by L. Horowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eqn. 1 can be derived by using Jones matrices described in Ref. 9 for the elements described in Fig. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L.W. Casperson and S.D. Lunnam, Appl. Opt. 14, 1193–1199. (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Kogelnik and T. Li, Appl. Opt. 5, 1550–1567 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harter, D.J., Walling, J.C. (1986). Low Magnification Unstable Resonators Using Radially Varying Birefringent Elements. In: Budgor, A.B., Esterowitz, L., DeShazer, L.G. (eds) Tunable Solid-State Lasers II. Springer Series in Optical Sciences, vol 52. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47433-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47433-3_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-13604-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47433-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics