Skip to main content

Innovative Techniques in Noma Reconstructive Surgery

  • Chapter
Innovations in Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery

Abstract

Noma (orofacial gangrene, necrotizing ulcerative stomatitis, stomatitis gangrenosa, or cancrum oris) is a devastating orofacial gangrene that occurs almost uniquely among children in less developed countries, during the weaning period [5, 6, 10, 11, 37, 38]. The most important risk factors are: poverty, malnutrition, a compromised immune system, poor oral hygiene and a lesion of the gingival mucosal barrier, as well as an unidentified bacterial factor [5]. The disease has an estimated global yearly incidence of 25,600-140,000 cases and a mortality rate of approximately 90% [13]. Patients who survive the acute noma stages generally suffer from its sequelae, including serious facial disfigurement, trismus and ankylosis, oral incontinence, and speech problems. This is why noma has been called “the face of poverty” [10, 26]. The complex facial defects can be classified with the NOITULP system, as proposed by Marck in 1998 [27]. NOITULP is an acronym of Nose, Outer lining, Inner lining, Trismus, Upper lip, Lower lip and Particularities. Every itemis validated and given a score from 0 to 4 (Table 22.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbe R (1898) A new plastic operation for the relief of deformity due to double harelip. Med Rec 447

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adekeye EO, Lavery KM, Nasser NA (1986) The versatility of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps in the reconstruction of cancrum oris defects of children and adolescents. J Maxillofac Surg 14:99–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ariyan S (1979) The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. A versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:73–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bakamjian VY (1965) A two-stage method for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with a primary pectoral skin flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 36:173–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baratti-Mayer D, Pittet B, Montandon D (2004) GESNOMA (Geneva Study Group on Noma): state-of-the-art medical research for humanitarian purposes. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 49:302–305

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baratti-Mayer D, Pittet B, Montandon D et al (2003) Noma: an “infectious” disease of unknown aetiology. Lancet Infect Dis3:419–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barthelemy I, Martin D, Sannajust JP, Marck K, Pistre V, Mondie JM (2002) Prefabricated superficial temporal fascia flap combined with a submental flap in noma surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:936–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chien CY, Hwang CF, Chuang HC, Jeng SF, Su CY (2005) Comparison of radial forearm free flap, pedicled buccal fat pad flap and split-thickness skin graft in reconstruction of buccal mucosal defect. Oral Oncol 41:694–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Benedetto G, Aquinati A, Pierangeli M, Scalise A, Bertani A (2005) From the “charretera” to the supraclavicular fascial island flap: revisitation and further evolution of a controversial flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:70–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Enwonwu CO (2006) Noma — the ulcer of extreme poverty. N Engl J Med 354:221–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Enwonwu CO, Falkler WA Jr, Phillips RS (2006) Noma (cancrum oris). Lancet 368:147–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Estlander JA (1872) Eine Methode aus der einen Lippe Substanzverluste der Anderen zu ersetzen. Arch Klin Chir 14:622

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fieger A, Marck KW, Busch R, Schmidt A (2003) An estimation of the incidence of noma in north-west Nigeria. Trop Med Int Health 8:402–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Freihofer HP (1991) Restricted opening of the mouth with an extra-articular cause in children. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 19:289–298

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Giessler GA, Schmidt AB (2003) Noma: experiences with a microvascular approach under West African conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:947–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hartman EH, van Damme PA, Kuokkanen H, Rayat S (2007) Trismus after temporoparietal fascia flap failure in Noma: a new salvage technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hartman EH, van Damme PA, Sauter H, Suominen SH (2006) The use of the pedicled supraclavicular flap in noma reconstructive surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 59:337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hartman EH, van Damme PA, Suominen SH (2006) The use of the pedicled supraclavicular flap in noma reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:270–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Heitland AS, Pallua N (2005) The single and double-folded supraclavicular island flap as a new therapy option in the treatment of large facial defects in Noma patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1591–1596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim JT (2003) Latissimus dorsi perforator flap. Clin Plast Surg 30:403–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JT, Kim SK, Koshima I, Moriguchi T (2002) An anatomic study and clinical applications of the reversed submental perforator-based island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2204–2210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S et al (2000) Anterolateral thigh flap donor-site complications and morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:584–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuhnel TS, Dammer R, Dunzl B, Beule AG, Strutz J (2003) New split scar cheek flap in reconstruction of noma sequelae. Br J Plast Surg 56:528–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuo YR, Jeng SF, Kuo MH et al (2001) Free anterolateral thigh flap for extremity reconstruction: clinical experience and functional assessment of donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1766–1771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lamberty BG, Cormack GC (1983) Misconceptions regarding the cervico-humeral flap. Br J Plast Surg 36:60–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. MarckK W (2003) A history of noma, the “face of poverty”. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1702–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marck KW, de Bruijn HP, Schmidt A (1998) Noma: the Sokoto approach. Eur J Plast Surg 21:277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mustarde JC (1970) The use of flaps in the orbital region. Plast Reconstr Surg 45:146–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nayak VK, Deschler DG (2004) Pedicled temporoparietal fascial flap reconstruction of select intraoral defects. Laryngoscope 114:1545–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pallua N, Machens HG, Rennekampff O, Becker M, Berger A (1997) The fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap for releasing postburn mentosternal contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:1878–1884

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pallua N, Magnus NE (2000) The tunneled supraclavicular island flap: an optimized technique for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:842–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pistre V, Pelissier P, Martin D, Baudet J (2001) The submental flap: its uses as a pedicled or free flap for facial reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 28:303–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Robb GL (1994) Free scapular flap reconstruction of the head and neck. Clin Plast Surg 21:45–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Song R, Gao Y, Song Y, Yu Y, Song Y (1982) The forearm flap. Clin Plast Surg 9:21–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL (1984) The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg 37:149–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tempest MN (1966) Cancrum oris. Br J Surg 53:949–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Van Damme PA (2004) Noma. Lancet Infect Dis 4:73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Van Damme PA (2006) Essay noma. Lancet 368:561–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH (2002) Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2219–2226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang G, Chen B, Gao Y (1981) Forearm free skin flap transplantation. Natl Med J China 61:139

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hartman, E.H.M., Van Damme, P.A., Suominen, S.H.H. (2008). Innovative Techniques in Noma Reconstructive Surgery. In: Eisenmann-Klein, M., Neuhann-Lorenz, C. (eds) Innovations in Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46326-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46326-9_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46321-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46326-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics