Skip to main content

The Role of Good Governance in Sustainable Development: Implications for Integrated Water Resource Management in Southern Africa

  • Chapter
Governance as a Trialogue: Government-Society-Science in Transition

Part of the book series: Water Resources Development and Management ((WRDM))

Abstract

The philosophy and principles of sustainable development offer African countries the alluring promise of being able to develop prosperous societies and economies without exhausting the natural resource-base on which these are based. However, urgent needs for social and economic relief, coupled with shortages of social, technical and economic resources, make it almost impossible for many of these countries to achieve this ideal in the short- to medium-term. Because sustainable development depends on the choices that society makes and the participative processes by which these choices are made, there is a clear need to ensure wide acceptance of the governance processes that are used in decision-making. Here, ‘good governance’ is recognised as a complex and multi-dimensional concept that incorporates a guiding philosophy or set of operating principles, a preferred process or way that people interact with each other, and a desired situation or outcome. The ‘Trialogue Model’ of the partnership between government, civil society and science offers useful insights into the attributes of good governance and the way that this underpins and facilitates prudent resource management. An examination of the approaches used by southern African countries to manage their water resources reveals that some SADC countries have entered a development phase that is characterised by shared systems of values and a growing alignment of national and regional policies, statutes and plans. This is well aligned with the philosophy of good governance, which requires full commitment from stakeholders at all levels of decision-making. Ultimately, the extent to which a governance system can be regarded as ‘good’ or ‘weak’ depends on whether or not the five key principles of good governance (openness, participation, accountability, effectiveness and coherence) are explicit in every decision-making process that affects the livelihoods of stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acreman M (2004) Water and ecology. In: Dooge J, Selborne J (eds) Water and ethics. Paris, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton PJ (2002) Avoiding conflicts over Africa’s water resources. Ambio 31:236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton PJ (2004) Water and development: a Southern African perspective. In: Trottier J, Slack P (eds) Managing water resources past and present: the 2002 Linacre lectures. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp 149–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton PJ, Chonguiça E (2003) Issues and trends in the regional harmonization of EIA processes in Southern Africa, with special reference to trans-boundary and cumulative impacts. In: Chonguiça E, Brett R (eds) Assessing the need for a regional approach to environmental impact assessment in Southern Africa. Harare, IUCN Regional Office for Southern Africa, pp 26–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton PJ, Neal MJ (2005) Public involvement in water resource management in the Okavango river basin. In: Brusch C, Jansky L, Nakayama M, Salewicz KA (eds) Public participation in the governance of international freshwater resources. Tokyo, United Nations University Press, pp 169–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton PJ, Patrick MJ, MacKay HM, Weaver AvB (2005) Integrating biodiversity concepts with good governance to support water resources management in South Africa. Water SA (31) 4:449–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton PJ, Ramasar V (2002) Water and HIV/AIDS: some strategic considerations for Southern Africa. In: Turton AR, Henwood R (eds) Hydropolitics in the developing world: a Southern African perspective. Pretoria, African Water Issues Research Unit (AWIRU), pp 217–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton PJ, Turton AR (in press) Water and security in Sub-Saharan Africa: emerging concepts and their implications for effective water resource management in the Southern African region. In: Brauch H-G, Grin J, Mesjasz C, Krummenacher H, Behera NC, Chourou B, Spring UO, Liotta PH, Kameri-Mbote P (eds) Facing global environmental change: environmental, human, energy, food, health and water security concepts — volume II. Berlin, Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch C, Jansky L, Nakayama M, Salewicz KA, Cassar A (2005) From theory to practice: an overview of approaches to involving the public in international watershed management. In: Brusch C, Jansky L, Nakayama M, Salewicz KA (eds) Public participation in the governance of international freshwater resources. Tokyo, United Nations University Press, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie F, Hanlon J (2001) African issues: Mozambique and the great flood of 2000. Bloomington, Indiana University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) (2005) The world factbook 2005. Washington DC, Central Intelligence Agency of the United States of America. Available online at http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos [Accessed November 2005]

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2001) European governance: a white paper. Brussels, Commission of the European Communities. Available online at http://europa.eu.int/-comm/governance/white_paper/index_en.htm [Accessed May 2003]

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations) (2005) Aquastat information service on water in agriculture and rural development. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online at http://www.fao.org/waicent/FaoInfo/Agricult/AGL/AQUASTAT/afric.htm [Accessed June 2005]

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M (1986) Freshwater: time for a modified approach. Ambio (15) 4:192–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M (1989) The massive water scarcity now threatening Africa: why isn’t it being addressed? Ambio (18) 2:112–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter SR, Elmqvist T, Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Walker BH, Bengtsson J, Berkes F, Colding J, Danell K, Falkenmark M, Gordon L, Kasperson RE, Kautsky N, Kinzig AP, Levin S, Mäler K-G, Moberg F, Ohlsson L, Olsson P, Ostrom E, Reid WV, Röckstrom J, Savenije HHG, Svedin U (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformation. Scientific background paper for the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Stockholm, Environmental Advisory Council

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick P (ed) (1998) The world’s water 1998–1999: the biennial report on freshwater resources. Washington DC, Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick P (ed) (2002) The world’s water 2002–2003: the biennial report on freshwater resources. Washington DC, Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • GWP (Global Water Partnership) (2000) A vision of water for food and rural development. The Hague, Global Water Partnership

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyns PSvH (2002) The inter-basin transfer of water between countries within the Southern African Development Community (SADC): a developmental challenge of the future. In: Turton AR, Henwood R (eds) Hydropolitics in the developing world: a Southern African perspective. Pretoria, African Water Issues Research Unit (AWIRU), pp 157–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirji R, Johnson P, Maro P, Chiuta TM (eds) (2002) Defining and mainstreaming environmental sustainability in water resources management in Southern Africa. Maseru, Harare, Washington DC, SADC, IUCN, SARDC, World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN-UNEP-WWF (International Union for the Conservation of Nature — United Nations Environment Programme — World Wildlife Fund) (1980) World conservation strategy. Gland, International Union for the Conservation of Nature

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN-ROSA (International Union for the Conservation of Nature — Regional Office for Southern Africa) (2001) Dialogue on transboundary natural resource management in Southern Africa. Report of the workshop held in Harare, Zimbabwe, 20–21 February 2001. Harare, IUCN-ROSA. Available online at http://www.iucnrosa.org.zw/tbnrm/publications_content.html [Accessed June 2005].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakonge JO (2002) Water scarcity and related environmental problems in parts of Sub-Saharan Africa: the role of the transboundary environmental impact assessment convention. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal (20)1:49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuwairi A (2004) The great man-made river project. Paper presented at the Pan African Water 2004 Conference. Sandton, South Africa, 29–30 November 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist J (2000) Rules and roles in water policy and management — need for clarification of rights and obligations. Water International (25)2:194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay HM (2003) Water policies and practice. In: Reed D, De Wit M (eds) Towards a just South Africa: the political economy of natural resource wealth. Washington DC, WWF Macroeconomics Programme, pp 49–83

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay HM, Ashton PJ (2004) Towards co-operative governance in the development and implementation of cross-sectoral policy: water policy as an example. Water SA (30)1:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • OAU (Organisation for African Unity) (1985) First African ministerial conference on the environment (AMCEN), Cairo, 16–18 December 1985. Cairo, Organisation for African Unity. Available online at http://www.unep.org/roa/amcen/-decisions_1.pdf [Accessed July 2005]

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallett J (1997) Sharing water in Southern Africa. Windhoek, Desert Research Foundation of Namibia

    Google Scholar 

  • Porto JG, Clover J (2003) The peace dividend in Angola: strategic implications for Okavango basin cooperation. In: Turton AR, Ashton PJ, Cloete TE (eds) Transboundary rivers, sovereignty and development: hydropolitical drivers in the Okavango river basin. Pretoria, African Water Issues Research Unit and Geneva, Green Cross International, pp 65–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramoeli P (2002) SADC protocol on shared watercourses: its history and current status. In: Turton AR, Henwood R (eds) Hydropolitics in the developing world: a Southern African perspective. Pretoria, African Water Issues Research Unit (AWIRU), pp 105–111

    Google Scholar 

  • SADC (Southern African Development Community) (1998) Regional strategic action plan (RSAP) for integrated water resources development and management in the SADC countries (1999–2004). Summary report. Maseru, SADC Water Sector Co-ordinating Unit

    Google Scholar 

  • SADC (Southern African Development Community) (2005) SADC review and country profiles. Harare, Southern African Development Community. Available online at http://www.sadcreview.com/country%20profiles%202005/ [Accessed June 2005]

    Google Scholar 

  • SARDC (Southern African Research and Documentation Centre) (1996) Water in Southern Africa. Harare, Southern African Research & Documentation Centre

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholes RJ, Biggs R (eds) (2004) Ecosystem services in Southern Africa: a regional assessment. Pretoria, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Shela ON (1996) Water resource management and sustainable development in Southern Africa: issues for consideration in implementing the Dublin Declaration and Agenda 21 in Southern Africa. In: Proceedings of the global water partnership workshop. Harare, Global Water Partnership

    Google Scholar 

  • Turton AR, Earle A, Malzbender D, Ashton PJ (2006) Hydropolitical vulnerability and resilience along Africa’s international waters. Chapter 3, in: Wolf AT (ed) Hydropolitical resilience and vulnerability along international waters. Nairobi, United Nations Environment Programme, Report UNEP/DEWA, 58 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • UNAIDS (Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS) (2005) Epidemiological fact sheets on HIV/AIDS and country profiles — country data for 2004. Geneva, United Nations AIDS Organisation and World Health Organisation (UNHCR, UNICEF, WFP, UNDP, UNFPA, UNODC, ILO, UNESCO, WHO, World Bank). Available online at http://www.unaids.org/countryprofiles [Accessed July 2005]

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCED (1992) Agenda 21 — Earth summit agreement. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Available online at http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/agenda21.htm [Accessed July 2005]

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECA (United Nations Economic Commission for Africa) (1991) Report on the Pan-African conference on environment and sustainable development, Bamako, 23–30 July 1991. Addis Ababa, United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, 11 pp. Available online at http://www.uneco.org/ECA/-Documents.html [Accessed June 2005]

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECA (United Nations Economic Commission for Africa) (1992) African common position on the African environment and development agenda, Abidjan, 11–14 November 1991. Addis Ababa, United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. Available online at http://www.uneca.org/-ECA/Documents.html [Accessed July 2005]

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECA and UNEP (United Nations Economic Commission for Africa and United Nations Environment Programme) (1989) Report of the first African regional conference on environment and sustainable development, Kampala, 12–16 June 1989. Addis Ababa, United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, and Nairobi, United Nations Environment Programme. Available online at http://www.uneca.org/ECA/NRD/ARCED/MC3 [Accessed July 2005]

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO-ISARM (United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation — International Shared Aquifer Resource Management) (2004) Managing shared aquifer resources in Africa. IHP-VI, series on groundwater 8. CD plus accompanying maps. Hanover, Germany, BGR — Fachgruppe Internationale Zusammenarbeit, Grundwasser

    Google Scholar 

  • WCD (World Commission on Dams) (2000) Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making. London, Earthscan Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987) Our common future. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf AT (1999) Criteria for equitable allocations: the heart of the international water conflict. Natural Resources Forum 23:3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005) African development indicators 2005. Washington DC, Development Data Centre, World Bank. Available online at http://www4.worldbank.org/afr/stats/adi2005/default.cfm [Accessed September 2005].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ashton, P.J. (2007). The Role of Good Governance in Sustainable Development: Implications for Integrated Water Resource Management in Southern Africa. In: Turton, A.R., Hattingh, H.J., Maree, G.A., Roux, D.J., Claassen, M., Strydom, W.F. (eds) Governance as a Trialogue: Government-Society-Science in Transition. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46266-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics