Summary
The aim of this study was to investigate in detail the flow field resulting from transonic shock wave / boundary layer interactions under control conditions. Several control techniques have been investigated: 1) active control consisting in sucking a part of the boundary layer flow through a slot, 2) hybrid control, which is a combination of a passive control cavity placed underneath the shock region and a suction slot (or cavity) located downstream, and 3) control by a local deformation of the surface, the so-called bump concept. In the experimental part of the study, flow surveys have been executed with a two-component LDV system, including mean velocity and Reynolds tensor component measurements. Results show that active control by slot suction produces an increase in wave drag, but a significant decrease in friction drag, especially when the slot is located just downstream of the shock. The tendencies are inverted when bump or hybrid control is applied, the bump control having nevertheless a moderate effect on the friction drag. Moreover, active control by a slot efficiently diminishes the turbulence level downstream of the interaction domain. The aim of the theoretical study was to discuss the problems involved in the modeling of the vertical velocity component at the wall in the control region and of the effect of control on the turbulent field. The RANS research solver Nasca has been used for numerical simulations. Both, the algebraic Baldwin-Lomax model and the transport equation [k-ε] Chien model were investigated, the latter having shown deficiencies in the prediction of the channel flow. On the other hand, Poll’s law and the Bohning-Doerffer law give a similar and fair reproduction of the vertical velocity at the wall in the control region.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
E. Stanewsky, J. Délery, J. Fulker and W. Geissler (Eds), “Euroshock–Drag Reduction by Passive Shock Control”, Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 56, Friedr.Vieweg and Sohn, 1997.
R. Bur, B. Corbel and J. Délery, “Study of Passive Control in a Transonic Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interaction”, AIAA Journal, Vol. 36, No. 3, 1998, pp. 394–400.
S. Osher and S. Chakravarthy, “Very High Order Accurate TVD Schemes”, ICASE Report 84–44, 1984.
B. S. Baldwin and H. Lomax, “Thin Layer Approximations and Algebraic Model for Separated Turbulent Flows”, AIAA Paper 78–0257, 1978.
K. Y. Chien, “Prediction of Channel and Boundary-Layer Flows with a LowReynolds-Number Turbulence Model”, AIAA Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1982, pp. 33–38.
H. C. Yee, R. M. Beam and R. F. Warming, “Boundary Approximations for Implicit Schemes for One-dimensional Inviscid Equations of Gas Dynamics”, AIAA Journal, Vol. 20, No. 9, 1982, pp. 1203–1211.
D. I. A. Poll, M. Danks and B. E. Humphreys, “The Aerodynamic Performance of Laser Drilled Sheets”, Proceedings of the First European Forum on Laminar Flow Technology, Hamburg, Germany, 1992, pp. 274–277.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bur, R., Benay, R., Corbel, B., Délery, J. (2002). Study of Control Devices Applied to a Transonic Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interaction. In: Stanewsky, E., Délery, J., Fulker, J., de Matteis, P. (eds) Drag Reduction by Shock and Boundary Layer Control. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design (NNFM), vol 80. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45856-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45856-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07762-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45856-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive