Skip to main content

Compliance Gaps: A Requirements Elicitation Approach in the Context of System Evolution

  • Conference paper
Object-Oriented Information Systems (OOIS 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2817))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Eliciting change requirements in the context of system evolution is different from eliciting requirements for a system developed from scratch. Indeed, there is a system and documentation that should be referred to. Therefore, the issue is not only to identify new functions, but to uncover and understand differences with the current situation. There is few approaches that systematise the identification and documentation of such change requirements. Our approach is based on the analysis at the model level of the fitness relationship between the business and the system. Our experience showed us that another kind of change requirements could also be found when asking the question of continuity at the instance level. The literature already proposes so called “modification policies" that allow to manage current instances of the system workflows and business processes when their model evolve. However, these approaches are not interested in the elicitation of the requirements that relate to these modification policies, but to the technical solutions that these policies provide. The position taken in this paper is that change requirements can be elicited by analysing system evolutions through modification policies at the instance level. The paper proposes to document these requirements using the same approach as other change requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Salinesi, C., Rolland, C.: Fitting Business Models to Systems Functionality Exploring the Fitness Relationship. In: Eder, J., Missikoff, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2681, pp. 16–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Salinesi, C., Presso, M.J.: A Method to Analyse Changes in the Realisation of Business Intentions and Strategies for Information System Adaptation. In: Proceedings of EDOC 2002, Lausanne, Switzerland (September 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rolland, C., Salinesi, C., Etien, A.: Eliciting Gaps in Requirements Change. To appear in Requirement Engineering Journal (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Etien, A., Salinesi, C.: Towards a Systematic Definition of Requirements for Software Evolution: A Case-study Driven Investigation. In: Proc of EMMSAD 2003 Velden, Austria (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sadiq, S.: Handling Dynamic Schema Change in Process Models. Australian Database Conference, Canberra, Australia. January 27- Febraury 02 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, C., Orlowska, M., Li., H.: Automating Handover in Dynamic Workflow Environments. In: Pernici, B., Thanos, C. (eds.) CAiSE 1998. LNCS, vol. 1413, p. 159. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bandinelli, S., Fuggetta, A., Ghezzi, C.: Software Process Model Evolution in the SPADE. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 19(12), 1128–1144 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarke, M., Pohl, K.: Requirements Engineering in 2001: Managing a Changing Reality. IEEE Software Engineering Journal, 257–266 ((November 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van der Aalst, W.: Generic Workflow Models: How to Handle Dynamic Change and Capture Management Information. In: Lenzerini, M., Dayal, U. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 115–126 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conradi, R., Fernström, C., Fuggetta, A.: A Conceptual Framework for Evolving Software Process. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 18(4), 26–34 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sadiq, S., Orlowska, M.: Architectural Considerations in Systems Supporting Dynamic Workflow Modification. In: Proceedings of the workshop on Software Architectures for Business Process Management at CAiSE 1999, Heidelberg, Germany, June14-18 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Joeris, G., Herzog, O.: Managing Evolving Workflow Specifications With Schema Versioning and Migration Rules. TZI Technical Report 15, University of Bremen (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Salinesi, C., Wäyrynen, J.: A Methodological Framework for Understanding IS Adaptation through Enterprise Change. In: Proceedings of OOIS 2002, 8th International Conference on Object-Oriented Information Systems, Montpellier, France (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rolland, C., Prakash, N.: Matching ERP System Functionality to Customer Requirements. In: Proceedings of RE 2001, Toronto, Canada, pp. 66–75 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rolland, C., Prakash, N., Benjamen, A.: A Multi-Model View of process Modelling. Requirements Engineering Journal 4, 169–187 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Han, J.: Supporting Impact Analysis and Change Propagation in Software Engineering Environments. In Proceedings of 8th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice (STEP 1997/CASE 1997), London, UK, July 1997, pp. 172–182 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Deruelle, L., Bouneffa, M., Goncalves, G., Nicolas, J.C.: Local and Federated Database Schemas Evolution An Impact Propagation Model. In: Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Soda, G., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) DEXA 1999. LNCS, vol. 1677, pp. 902–911. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Chauman, M.A., Kabaili, H., Keller, R.K., Lustman, F.: A Change Impact Model for Changeability Assessment in Object Oriented Software Systems. In: Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, IEEE Comput. Soc, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Salinesi, C., Etien, A. (2003). Compliance Gaps: A Requirements Elicitation Approach in the Context of System Evolution. In: Konstantas, D., Léonard, M., Pigneur, Y., Patel, S. (eds) Object-Oriented Information Systems. OOIS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2817. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45242-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45242-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40860-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45242-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics