Advertisement

Event-Based Software Architectures

  • Monique Snoeck
  • Wilfried Lemahieu
  • Cindy Michiels
  • Guido Dedene
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2817)

Abstract

Implementation architectures of today are based on the modularisation of software into objects, components, web services, (intelligent) agents, ... with communication and coordination between components being based on peer-to-peer communication (a client-component requests a service from a server-component). Because this binary and uni-directional form of communication implies substantial restrictions on software maintainability, this paper proposes the development of a new N-ary and multi-directional communication paradigm based on the notion of “event": components will interact by jointly participating in events. This new communication paradigm uses event broadcasting as a coordination mechanism between software components. It can be implemented by means of generic binary interaction frameworks applicable across diverse platforms (distributed, web-based and centralised systems) and implementation paradigms (synchronous and asynchronous communication). In addition, events can be enriched with intelligent features so as to be able to act autonomously and to be capable of undertaking some rescue actions when one of the composing actions fails.

Keywords

Remote Service Business Rule Enterprise Information System Output Service Input Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cheesman, J., Daniels, J.: UML Components, A simple process for specifying componentbased software, p. 208. Addison Wesley, Reading (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fensel, D., Bussler, C.: The Web Service Modeling Framework WSMF. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 1(2) (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D’Iverno, M., Luck, M.: Understanding Agent Systems, p. 191. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jackson, M.A., Cameron, J.R.: Systems Development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1983)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nilsson, A.G., Tolis, C., Nellborn, C. (eds.): Perspectives on Domain modeling: understanding and Changing Organisations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cook, S., Daniels, J.: Designing object systems: object-oriented modeling with Syntropy. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sowa, J.F., Zachman, J.A.: Extending and formalising the framework for information system architecture. IBM Systems Journal 31(3), 590–616 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McKim, J., Mitchell, R.: Design by Contract: By example, p. 256. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meyer, B.: Object Oriented Software Construction, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Snoeck, M., Dedene, G., Verhelst, M., Depuydt, A.M.: Object-oriented Enterprise Modeling with MERODE. Leuven University Press, Leuven (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Snoeck, M., Dedene, G.: Existence Dependency: The key to semantic integrity between structural and behavioral aspects of object types. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(24), 233–251 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wilfried, L., Monique, S., Cindy, M.: Integration of Third-Party Applications and Web-Clients by Means of an Enterprise Layer. Accepted for Volume V of the Annals of Cases on Information Technology (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilfried, L., Monique, S., Cindy, M.: An Enterprise Layer based Approach to Application Service integration. Accepted for Business Process Management Journal – Special Issue on ASPGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lemahieu, W., Snoeck, M., Michiels, C., Goethals, F.: An Event Based Approach to Web Service Design and Interaction. In: Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Orlowska, M.E. (eds.) APWeb 2003. LNCS, vol. 2642, pp. 333–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lemahieu, W., Snoeck, M., Michiels, C., Goethals, F., Dedene, G., Vandenbulcke, J.: A model-driven, layered architecture for web service development submitted to IEEE Computer. Special issue on Web Services Computing (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Snoeck, M., Poels, G.: Improving the Reuse Possibilities of the Behavioral Aspects of Object-Oriented Domain Models. In: Laender, A.H.F., Liddle, S.W., Storey, V.C. (eds.) ER 2000. LNCS, vol. 1920, pp. 423–439. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monique Snoeck
    • 1
  • Wilfried Lemahieu
    • 1
  • Cindy Michiels
    • 1
  • Guido Dedene
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Economic SciencesKULeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations