Skip to main content

A Principle for Incorporating Axioms into the First-Order Translation of Modal Formulae

  • Conference paper
Automated Deduction – CADE-19 (CADE 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2741))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we present a translation principle, called the axiomatic translation, for reducing propositional modal logics with background theories, including triangular properties such as transitivity, Euclideanness and functionality, to decidable logics. The goal of the axiomatic translation principle is to find simplified theories, which capture the inference problems in the original theory, but in a way that is more amenable to automation and easier to deal with by existing theorem provers. The principle of the axiomatic translation is conceptually very simple and can be largely automated. Soundness is automatic under reasonable assumptions, and termination of ordered resolution is easily achieved, but the non-trivial part of the approach is proving completeness.

We thank Hans de Nivelle and Dmitry Tishkovsky for valuable discussions and suggestions. Support through research grants GR/M36700 and GR/M88761 from the UK Government’s EPSRC is gratefully acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. De Giacomo, G.: Eliminating “converse” from converse PDL. J. Logic, Language and Inform. 5(2), 193–208 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. De Nivelle, H., Schmidt, R.A., Hustadt, U.: Resolution-based methods for modal logics. Logic J. IGPL 8(3), 265–292 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Demri, S.: The complexity of regularity in grammar logics and related modal logics. Journal of Logic and Computation 11(6), 933–960 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Demri, S., de Nivelle, H.: Deciding regular grammar logics with converse through first-order logic (2002) (manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Demri, S., Goré, R.: Tractable transformations from modal provability logics into first-order logic. In: Ganzinger, H. (ed.) CADE 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1632, pp. 16–30. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Gabbay, D.M.: Decidability results in non-classical logics. Ann. Math. Logic 8, 237–295 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganzinger, H., Meyer, C., de Nivelle, H.: The two-variable guarded fragment with transitive relations. In: Proc. LICS, pp. 24–34. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hustadt, U., Dixon, C., Schmidt, R.A., Fisher, M.: Normal forms and proofs in combined modal and temporal logics. In: Kirchner, H. (ed.) FroCos 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1794, pp. 73–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hustadt, U., Schmidt, R.A.: On the relation of resolution and tableaux proof systems for description logics. In: Proc. IJCAI 1999, pp. 110–115. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kracht, M.: Tools and Techniques in Modal Logic. Studies in Logic, vol. 142. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kracht, M.: Reducing modal consequence relations. J. Logic Computat. 11(6), 879–907 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kracht, M.: Notes on the space requirements for checking satisfiability in modal logics. To appear in Advances in Modal Logic 4 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lutz, C.: Complexity of terminological reasoning revisited. In: Ganzinger, H., McAllester, D., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1705, pp. 181–200. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohlbach, H.J.: Combining Hilbert style and semantic reasoning in a resolution framework. In: Kirchner, C., Kirchner, H. (eds.) CADE 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1421, pp. 205–219. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt, R.A., Hustadt, U.: A principle for incorporating axioms into the firstorder translation of modal formulae. Preprint CSPP-22, Univ. Manchester, UK (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schmidt, R.A., Hustadt, U. (2003). A Principle for Incorporating Axioms into the First-Order Translation of Modal Formulae. In: Baader, F. (eds) Automated Deduction – CADE-19. CADE 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2741. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45085-6_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45085-6_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40559-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45085-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics