Advertisement

On Ensuring Lower Bounds of Negotiation Results

  • Otmar Görlitz
  • Ralf Neubert
  • Wolfgang Benn
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1860)

Abstract

Employing software agents in tasks of electronic commerce where monetary values are negotiated and possibly exchanged by the agents autonomously, rises the question about the reliability of the agents. A human client expects his authorized agent to perform its tasks stable, reliable and safe, i.e. the agent should neither crash nor behave unpredictable in unexpected situations. It should always pursue the best possible deal and should be highly immune against fraud. We have developed an intelligent, adaptive agent model for integrative negotiations and show the stability of the model’s behaviour, the reliability of guaranteed negotiation results and the insusceptibility against possible manipulations and fraud.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benn, W., Görlitz, O., Neubert, R.: An Adaptive Software Agent for Automated Integrative Negotiations. Int’l. Journ. of e-Business Strategy Management 1(2) (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benn, W., Gorlitz, O., Neubert, R.: Enabling Integrative Negotiations by Adaptive Software Agents. In: Cooperative Information Agents III. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chavez, A., Dreilinger, D., Guttman, R., Maes, P.: A Real-Life Experiment in Creating an Agent Marketplace. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int’l. Conf. on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents in Multi-Agent Technology (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fankhauser, P., Tesch, T.: Agents, a Broker, and Lies. In: Proc. of the 9th Int’l. Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guttman, R., Maes, P.: Agent-mediated Integrative Negotiation for Retail Electronic Commerce. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Agent Mediated Electronic Trading (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guttman, R., Moukas, A., Maes, P.: Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce: A survey. Knowledge Engineering Review (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Keeny, R., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1976)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krauss, S., Wilkenfeld, J., Zlotkin, G.: Multiagent Negotiation Under Time Constraints. Artificial Intelligence Journal 75(2) (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewicki, R., Saunders, D., Minton, J.: Essentials of Negotiation, Irwin (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    MOMIS, Mediator evirOnment for Multiple Information Sources, http://sparc20.dsi.unimo.it/momis/index.html
  12. 12.
    Nash Jr., J.F.: The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica 18 (1950)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nash, J.: Non-Cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics 54 (1951)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In: Proc. of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: A model-theoretic approach to the verification of situated reasoning systems. In: Proc. of the 13th Int’l. Joint Conf. on AI (1993)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosenschein, J., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. In: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shepley, L.S., Shubik, M.: On Market Games. J.E.T. 1 (1969)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    TQT: frictionless online shopping, http://ecommerce.media.mit.edu/Tete-a-Tete/
  19. 19.
    Tesch, T., Fankhauser, P.: Arbitration and Matchmaking for Agents with Conflicting Interests. In: Cooperative Information Agents III. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tooto Internet Technologies, Trainable Agent, http://www.tooto.com/agents/
  21. 21.
    TSIMMIS, The Stanford-IBM Manager of Multiple Information Sources, http://www-db.stanford.edu/tsimmis/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Otmar Görlitz
    • 1
  • Ralf Neubert
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Benn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceChemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitzGermany

Personalised recommendations