Compatibility Elements in System Composition
Composition of systems requires compatibility between its components. In today’s software market the compatibility relations between components are complex: there is a variety of compatibility elements, which can be proprietary or standardized. Moreover, network externalities concur to give higher value to compatible components, while transition costs impair the migration between incompatible products. The paper analyzes the technical and economic aspects of compatibility in system composition. It presents the different perspectives of system builders and component producers with respect to compatibility in the reference domain of email systems.
KeywordsNetwork Externality Component Producer System Composition Compatibility Relation Transition Cost
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Yellin, D.M., Strom, R.E.: Interfaces, protocols, and the semi-automatic construction of software adaptors. In: Proceedings of the ninth annual conference on Object- oriented programming systems, language, and applications, Portland, OR, October 23- 28, pp. 176–190 (1994)Google Scholar
- 3.Weber, F.: Towards a discipline of class composition. In: proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications (Addendum), Vancouver, B.C. Canada, October 18-22, pp. 149–151 (1992)Google Scholar
- 4.Gandal, N.: Hedonic Price Indexes for Spreadsheets and an Empirical Test of the Network Externalities Hypothesis. RAND Journal of Economics 25(1) (1994)Google Scholar
- 6.Farrell, J., Saloner, G.: Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation. Rand Jour-nal of Economics 16(1) (1985)Google Scholar
- 7.Farrell, J., Saloner, G.: Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation. American Economic Review 76(5) (1986)Google Scholar
- 8.Farrell, J., Saloner, G.: Converters, Compatibility, and the Control of Interfaces. The Journal of Industrial Economics 40(1) (1992)Google Scholar
- 10.Shapiro, C., Varian, H.R.: Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business School Pr., Boston (1999)Google Scholar
- 11.Choi, J.P.: Network Externality, Compatibility Choice, and Planned Obsolescence. Journal of Industrial Economics 42(2) (1994)Google Scholar
- 12.Poulin, J.S.: Software Architectures, Product Lines, and DSSAs: Choosing the Appropriate Level of Abstraction. In: Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Institutionalizing Soft- ware Reuse, Columbus, Ohio (1997)Google Scholar
- 13.Simos, M.A.: Lateral Domains: Beyond Product-Line Thinking. In: proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Institutionalizing Software Reuse, Columbus, Ohio (1997)Google Scholar
- 14.Baumol, W.J., Panzar, J.C., Willig, R.D.: Contestable Markets and The Theory of Industrial Structure. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York (1982)Google Scholar