Advertisement

Numerical Computation in Magnetofluid Dynamics

  • Robert W. MacCormack
Conference paper
  • 262 Downloads
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics (NNFM) book series (NNFM, volume 78)

Summary

The equations of magnetofluid dynamics are not homogeneous of degree one with respect to the state vector and can not therefore be directly flux vector split. They are usually solved in nonconservation form. Last year a method1 was presented that first modifies these equations into “homogeneous of degree one” conservation form and then uses a modified Steger-Warming Flux Splitting algorithm for their solution. This algorithm is extented herein and applied to solve a problem of significant current interest — potential drag reduction for a hypersonic flight vehicle through the interaction of an applied magnetic field with the surrounding flow field. Specifically, real gas flow at Mach 10.6 about a sphere-cone body with a magnetic dipole placed at the sphere center is numerically simulated with varying dipole strength. The results are in agreement with the experimental observations of Ziemer2 and the theoretical results of Bush3 forty years ago in that the bow shock standoff distance increased, flow gradients within the shock layer decreased and pressure fell off more rapidly from the stagnation point with increased imposed magnetic field strength. Contrary to speculation, the drag actaully increased with magnetic dipole strength. Heat transfer, however, did decrease substanially.

Keywords

Magnetic Field Strength Stagnation Point AIAA Paper Shock Layer Flux Vector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    MacCormack, R.W., “An Upwind Conservation Form Method for the Ideal Magneto-Hydrodynamics Equations,” AIAA Paper No. 99–3609,1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ziemer, R.W., “Experimental Investigation in Magneto-Aerodynamics,” American Rocket Society Journal,Vol.29, p642–647, 1959.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bush, B.B., “Magnetohydrodynamic Hypersonic Flow Past a Blunt Body,” Journal of the Aero/Space Sciences,Vol.25, p685–690, 1958.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Powell, K.G., “An Approximate Riemann Solver for Magnetohydrodynamics,” NASA CR 194902, ICASE Report 94–24,1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brio, M. and Wu, C.C., “An Upwind Differencing Scheme for the Equations of Ideal Hydrodynamics,” Journal of Computational Physics,Vol.115, p485–514, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agustinus, J., Hoffmann, K.A., and Harada, S., “Numerical Solutions of MHD Equations for Blunt Bodies at Hypersonic Speeds,”Aiaa Paper No 98–0850, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Agarwal R.K.and Agustinus, J., “Numerical Simulation of Compressible Viscous MHD Flows for Reducing Supersonic Drag of Blunt Bodies,”AIAA Paper No. 99–0601,1999.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Damevin, H.-M., Dietiker, J.-F., and Hoffman, K.A., “Hypersonic Flow Computations with Magnetic Field,” AIAA Paper No. 2000–0451,2000.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Canupp, P.W., “Resolution of Magnetogasdynamic Phenomena using a Flux-Vector Splitting Method,” AIAA Paper No. 2000–2477,2000.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gaitonde, D.V., “Development of a Solver for 3-D Non-Ideal Magnetogasdynamics,” AIAA Paper No. 99–8610, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Powell, K.G., Roe, P.L., Myong, R.S., Gombosi, T., and Zeeuw, D.De., “An Upwind Scheme for Magnetohydrodynamics,” AIAA Paper No.95–1704-CP, 1995.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacCormack, R.W., “A New Implicit Algorithm for Fluid Flow,” AIAA Paper No. 972100, 1997.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacCormack, R.W., “A Fast and Accurate Method for Solving the Navier-Stokes Equations,” 21st ICAS Congress, Melbourne, Austrailia, Sept. 1998.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tannehill, J.C.,, and P.H. Mugge, “Improved Curve Fits for the Thermodynamic Properties of Equilibrium Air Suitable for Numerical Computations Using Time-Dependent or Shock Capturing Methods,” NASA CR-2740, 1974.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blackbiil, J.U., and Barnes, D.C., “The Effects of Nonzero t–B = 0 on the Numerical Solution of the Magnetohydrodynamic Equations,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 35, p426–430, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. MacCormack
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Aeronautics and AstronauticsStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations