Computational Methods for Parachute Aerodynamics
- 267 Downloads
We highlight some recent methods developed by the Team for Advanced Flow Simulation and Modeling http://www.mems.rice.edu/TAFSM/ for computation of parachute aerodynamics and fluid-structure interactions. This class of problems involve several computational challenges, including computation of unsteady long-wake flows generated by cargo aircraft carrying paratroopers and the affect of that unsteady wake on a parachute crossing it, as well as parachute aeromechanics simulations that take into account the changes in the parachute shape. Among the numerical methods we have developed to address these challenges are: a multi-domain method for computation of long-wake flows and flow around objects placed in such wakes, methods for the simultaneous solution of the fluid and structural mechanics equations governing the aeromechanics of a parachute. and advanced mesh moving methods. Our presentation here includes numerical examples that demonstrate the new computer simulation capabilities offered by the methods we have developed.
KeywordsFinite Element Formulation Wake Flow Canopy Surface Test Function Space Unsteady Wake
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- T.E. Tezduyar, M. Behr, and J. Liou, “A new strategy for finite element cornputations involving moving boundaries and interfaces -- the deforming-spatialdomain,space-time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary tests”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 94 (1992) 339–351.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- T.E. Tezduyar, M. Behr, S. Mittal, and J. Liou, “A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces — the deformingspatial-domain,space-time procedure: II. Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 94 (1992) 353–371.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- K. Stein, R. Benney, V. Kairo, T.E. Tezduyar, J. Leonard, and M. Accorsi, “Parachute fluid-structure interactions: 3-D Computation”, to appear in Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.Google Scholar
- T.E. Tezduyar, M. Behr, S. Mittal, and A.A. Johnson, “Computation of unsteady incompressible flows with the finite element methods — space-time formulations, iterative strategies and massively parallel implementations”, in P. Smolinski, W.K. Liu, G. Hulbert, and K. Tamma, editors, New Methods in Transient Analysis, AMDVol. 143, ASME, New York, (1992) 7–24.Google Scholar
- K.J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1996.Google Scholar
- A. Lo, Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Cable and Membrane Structure, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Oregon State University, 1982.Google Scholar
- T.E. Tezduyar, S. Aliabadi, and M. Behr, “Enhanced-Discretization Interface-Capturing Technique”, in Y. Matsumoto and A. Prosperetti, editors, Proceedings of the ‘SAC ’97 High Performance Computing on Multiphase Flows, 1–6, Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1997.Google Scholar
- E.R. Van Driest, “On turbulent flow near a wall”, Journal of Aerospace Science, 1 (1956) 1007–1011.Google Scholar