Summary
The present work is aiming at aerodynamic multi-point, inverse, optimization of airfoils as well as at aeroelastic, multi-disciplinary, optimization of the exposed X31 delta wing. Results are achieved by means of a multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA) utilizing a GUI-supported software being developed in the European-Union funded “FRONTIER” project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Spicer, D., Cook, J., C. Poloni, C., Sen, P: EP 20082 Frontier: Industrial multiobjective design optimization. In: D. Papailiou et al (Eds.), Computational Fluid Dynamics ‘88, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1998.
JAVA language:www. j avasoft.com/doc/language_environment
Jameson, A., Schmidt, W and Turkel, E (1981): Numerical solutions of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge—Kutta time—stepping schemes. AIAA—Paper 81–1259.
Haase, W, Wagner, B., Jameson, A. (1983): Development of a Navier—Stokes Method Based on a Finite Volume Technique for the Unsteady Euler Equations. In: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, Vieweg Verlag, 7, pp. 99–107.
Johnson, D.A., King, L.S. (1985): A mathematical simple turbulence closure model for attached and separated turbulent boundary layers. AIAA Paper 84–0175.
Johnson, D.A., Coakley, T.J. (1990): Improvements to a non—equilibrium algebraic turbulence model. AIAA J., 28, No. 11, pp. 2000–2003.
Stock, H. W., Haase, W(1989): Determination of Length Scales in Algebraic Turbulence Models forNavier—Stokes Methods. AIAA Journal, 27, No. 1, pp. 5–14.
Schweiger, J., Krammer, J., Hörnlein, H.R.E.M.:Development and Application of the Integrated Structural Design Tool LAGRANGE. 6th AIAA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, Washington, September 1996. AIAA-96–4169.
Aeroelastic Tailoring of Advanced Composi te Structures for Military Aircraft, Volume III—Modifications and User’s Guide for Procedure TS O. General Dynamics Corporation/ Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Analysis and Optimization Branch (FBR), Wright Patterson Air Force Base. Technical Report AFFDL—TR-76–100, Vol. I II, Feb. 1978.
Fornasier, L.: Optimization of the wing—pylon—nacelle test case TE5 by HISSS—D, a panel method—based design tool. In: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, J.Periaux et al, Vol. 61, Vieweg, 1997.
Periaux et al.: Optimum Aerodynamic Design & Parallel Navier—Stokes Computations —ECARP, European Computational Aerodynamics Research Project. Notes of Numerical Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 61, Vie-weg, 1998.
INGENET: European Commission project on the use of genetic algorithms in an industrial context. See Web address:http://www.inria.fr/sinus/ingenet.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Haase, W., Maigret, V., Stettner, M. (2001). Multi-Objective Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Optimization. In: Computational Fluid Dynamics for the 21st Century. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics (NNFM), vol 78. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44959-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44959-1_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07558-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44959-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive